June 7, 2011
Indiana Court of Appeals
Michael
J. Gaby v. State of Indiana
79A02-1006-CR-804
Criminal. Reverses conviction of Class A felony child molesting and remands for new trial, stating the trial court erred
in permitting the state to refresh the victim’s recollection by allowing her to read a previous statement she made.
Holds that retrial will not violate double jeopardy grounds because sufficient evidence exists to support conviction.
More
June 6, 2011
Indiana Court of Appeals
Estate
of Verna D. Carter v. Holly F. Szymczak
71A04-1008-CT-472
Civil tort. Affirms jury verdict of $125,000 in favor of Szymczak on her negligence complaint against Carter alleging her
negligence caused a car accident and injury to Szymczak. Based on the evidence, a reasonable jury could infer that Carter
made an unsafe lane change, negligently causing the collision and injury to Szymczak. The trial court did not err in allowing
the Permanent Partial Impairment rating evidence to be admitted.
More
June 3, 2011
7th Circuit Court of Appeals
Maetta
Vance v. Ball State University, et al.
08-3568
U.S. District Court, Southern District of Indiana, Indianapolis Division, Judge Sarah Evans Barker.
Civil. Affirms District Court’s summary judgment for the defendants and dismissal of discrimination lawsuit, stating
the plaintiff failed to prove that her treatment at work was in any way affected by her race, and that the plaintiff did not
prove that Ball State University was negligent in taking steps to remediate reported harassment.
More
June 2, 2011
Indiana Court of Appeals
Larry
Ault v. State of Indiana
49A04-1008-CR-492
Criminal. Reverses conviction of felony murder and remands for a new trial. There was sufficient evidence, without Ault’s
testimony, to support a jury instruction on self-defense.
More
June 1, 2011
Indiana Supreme Court
Jeffery
Sloan v. State of Indiana
18S04-1009-CR-502
Criminal. Affirms convictions of and sentence for Class A felony and Class C felony child molesting. Holds once concealment
has been established, statutes of limitations for criminal offenses are tolled under Indiana Code 35-41-4-2(h) until a prosecuting
authority becomes aware or should have become aware of sufficient evidence to charge the defendant. Also holds that under
the facts of this case, there was no double jeopardy violation because each challenged offense was established by separate
and distinct facts. Justices Sullivan and Rucker dissent.
More
May 31, 2011
Indiana Court of Appeals
Dennis
Block v. Mark Magura
64A05-1012-PL-752
Civil plenary. Reverses summary judgment for Magura on Block’s lawsuit filed after Magura didn’t complete the
purchase of Block’s interest in a partnership. The letter of intent is an enforceable contract because it contains the
essential terms of the parties’ agreement and expresses their intent to be bound. Remands for summary judgment in favor
of Block as to Magura’s liability for breach of contract and to conduct further proceedings with respect to damages.
More
May 26, 2011
Indiana Court of Appeals
Jerry
French, et al. v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Company
18A02-1005-PL-489
Civil plenary. Affirms the trial court properly denied summary judgment for both parties on the question of whether the insurance
policy terms covered the cost of replacing the Frenches’ manufactured home with a stick-built one. Remands with instructions
to enter summary judgment in favor of State Farm on the Frenches’ coverage-by-estoppel claim because there is no dispute
that coverage exists; to enter summary judgment for the Frenches on the question of reformation of the policy based on mutual
mistake of fact and rescission of the policy based on concealment of material facts by the Frenches. Remands for trial on
whether State Farm should be liable for the costs of a stick-built home.
More
May 25, 2011
Indiana Court of Appeals
Estate
of Bradley Kinser, et al. v. Indiana Insurance Company
29A02-1009-PL-1093
Civil plenary. Reverses summary judgment in favor of Indiana Insurance on its motion for declaratory judgment that it’s
not obligated to cover any losses following Bradley Kinser’s accident and death while driving his girlfriend’s
car because his policy excluded coverage for a vehicle furnished or available for his regular use. A genuine issue of material
fact remains as to the scope and extent that Kinser felt he needed his girlfriend’s permission to drive her car, which
affects the determination of whether the car was furnished or available for his regular use.
More
May 24, 2011
Indiana Court of Appeals
S.W.
by P.W. v. B.K.
71A03-1012-PO-655
Protective order. Reverses trial court’s denial of S.W.’s motion to correct error, remands for a hearing on civil
contempt petition, and orders S.W. to be reimbursed $250 appellate filing fee. Held that Indiana code states filing fees will
not be assessed for a proceeding seeking relief from or enforcement of a civil protective order.
More
May 23, 2011
Indiana Court of Appeals
Jimmie
E. Jones, Jr. v. State of Indiana
29A02-1008-CR-935
Criminal. Affirms conviction for felony murder, stating that the trial court did not err by refusing Jimmie Jones’s
tendered instructions on reckless homicide and involuntary manslaughter, as evidence suggests Jones knowingly and willingly
killed the victim.
More
May 20, 2011
7th Circuit Court of Appeals
Digitech
Computer, Inc. v. Trans-Care, Inc.
10-1525 & 10-1652
Civil. Affirms decisions on fraud and breach of contract, but vacates damages awarded and remands for a new calculation of
damages and fees in accordance with opinion.
More
May 19, 2011
Indiana Court of Appeals
James
S. Tracy v. Steve Morell, et al.
59A01-1009-PL-488
Civil plenary. Affirms trial court’s ruling that James Tracy failed to meet his burden of proof on his fraud claim
in the sale of a tractor. Reverses court’s ruling that Tracy owed a balance on the promissory note, stating the contract
for sale of the tractor is unenforceable because there was a mutual mistake of fact between the parties and the contract violates
public policy. Holds that Tracy is entitled to the contract for sale of the tractor and to a money judgment in the amount
he has paid on the note together with interest.
More
May 18, 2011
Tyrus
D. Coleman v. State of Indiana
20S03-1008-CR-458
Criminal. Affirms Coleman’s conviction of and sentence for attempted murder. The Double Jeopardy Clause of the U.S.
Constitution doesn’t preclude the state from retrying a defendant where in the first trial the jury acquitted him of
murder with respect to one person but failed to return a verdict on a charge of attempted murder with respect to another man.
More
May 17, 2011
Indiana Court of Appeals
Citimortgage,
Inc. v. Shannon S. Barabas, et al.
48A04-1004-CC-232
Civil collection. Affirms grant of amended default judgment in favor of ReCasa Financial Group and Rick Sanders. The trial
court did not abuse its discretion when it found that Indiana Code Section 32-29-8-3 precluded Citimortgage’s claim
because Citimortgage failed to intervene more than a year after it first acquired interest in the property. When Irwin Mortgage
filed a petition and disclaimed its interest in the foreclosure, MERS, as mere nominee and holder of nothing more than bare
legal title to the mortgage, did not have an enforceable right under the mortgage separate from the interest held by Irwin
Mortgage. Judge Brown dissents.
More
May 13, 2011
Indiana Court of Appeals
Melody
D. Linenburg v. Mark A. Linenburg
82A01-1011-DR-625
Domestic relation. Affirms provisional order awarding father primary physical custody of the children and possession of the
marital residence during the pendency of the dissolution proceeding. The mother failed to establish an abuse of discretion
and the court declines to reweigh the evidence.
More
May 12, 2011
Indiana Supreme Court
State
ex rel. Gregory F. Zoeller v. Aisin USA Manufacturing, Inc.
36S01-1009-CV-469
Civil. Holds the attorney general’s attempt to recover a “tax refund” from Aisin in Jackson Superior Court
may proceed. It does not arise under the tax laws because the “refund” was the result of accounting and clerical
errors with in the Department of Revenue that were wholly unrelated to any interpretation or application of tax law. Justices
Rucker and Dickson dissent.
More
May 11, 2011
7th Circuit Court of Appeals
Bloomfield
State Bank v. United States of America
10-3939
U.S. District Court, Southern District of Indiana, Terre Haute Division, Judge Larry J. McKinney.
Civil. Reverses summary judgment for the government in the bank’s suit that rent collected on a property in which the
bank provided the mortgage should to the bank, not to the IRS to go toward a tax lien. The real estate that generated the
rental income at issue in this case existed when the mortgage was issued and thus before the tax lien attached; the rental
income was proceeds of that property, which preexisted the tax lien. Remands with directions to enter judgment for the bank.
More
May 10, 2011
Cornelius
T. Lacey, Sr. v. State of Indiana
02S05-1010-CR-601
Criminal. Affirms denial of Lacey’s motion to suppress. The police did not have to present known supporting facts and
obtain an advance judicial authorization for the no-knock entry. Summarily affirms the Indiana Court of Appeals as to all
other issues.
More
May 9, 2011
Indiana Court of Appeals
Johnnie
Stokes v. State of Indiana
49A04-1009-CR-578
Criminal. Affirms 44-year aggregate sentence for Class B felonies robbery, attempted robbery, and unlawful possession of
a firearm, and Class C felony criminal recklessness. The trial court did not abuse its discretion in considering Stokes’
2001 dealing in cocaine conviction and evidence of his extensive criminal record to enhance his sentences for his other present
offenses. His sentences also do not violate the double jeopardy clause of the Indiana Constitution.
More
May 6, 2011
7th Circuit Court of Appeals
United
States of America v. Jermel C. Thomas
10-3566
U.S. District Court, Northern District of Indiana, South Bend Division,
Judge Robert L. Miller, Jr.
Criminal. Dismisses appeal, stating the District Court did not err in enforcing a plea agreement wherein Jermel Thomas had
waived his right to appeal his sentence and conviction.
More
May 5, 2011
7th Circuit Court of Appeals
United
States of America v. John L. Norris
10-1612
U.S. District Court, Southern District of Indiana, Indianapolis Division, Judge Sarah Evans Barker.
Criminal. Affirms denial of motion to suppress evidence. The police officers were acting pursuant to a valid warrant and
in a reasonable manner.
More
May 4, 2011
Indiana Court of Appeals
Robert
Eppl v. Christine DiGiacomo
45A03-1007-SC-402
Small claim. Reverses summary judgment for DiGiacomo and order that Eppl return DiGiacomo’s security deposit and pay
her attorney fees. DiGiacomo’s mere delivery of the keys is not sufficient to demonstrate that Eppl actually accepted
surrender of the premises and thereby released her from liability as of that date. Eppl’s itemization of damages letter
was timely.
More
May 3, 2011
7th Circuit Court of Appeals
United
States of America v. Donald Leach
10-1786
U.S. District Court, Northern District of Indiana, South Bend Division, Judge Robert L. Miller Jr.
Criminal. Affirms denial of Leach’s motion to dismiss his indictment for knowingly failing to register as a sex offender
after traveling in interstate commerce in violation of the Sex Offender Registration and Notification Act. There is no ex
post facto violation of the United States Constitution.
More
May 2, 2011
7th Circuit Court of Appeals
United
States of America v. David Lee Runyan
10-3400
U.S. District Court, Northern District of Indiana, Hammond Division, Judge James T. Moody.
Criminal. Affirms 63-year sentence for being a felon in possession of a firearm. Runyan argued the District Court sentenced
him without considering the care he gave his then-terminally ill father, but his argument rested on past caregiving rather
than present caregiving and the District Court didn’t need to address it. Also finds the District Court’s commentary
at sentencing to not be impermissibly one-sided.
More
Jack, I was only responding to bill's comment of tying everybody in government together. I agree with you though, it takes one bad apple to ruin the bunch.. As in any profession. What's truly unfair is when somebody violates someone's trust and takes complete advantage of someone
John’s comment is unfair. The majority of attorneys can be trusted. Unfortunately, all it takes is one greedy, unscrupulous, immoral attorney to jade the public.
In regards to bill's comment about trusting the cover meant. We can trust them about as much as we can trust attorneys'.
This is disturbing to learn...
Yikes!