February 25, 2011
Indiana Court of Appeals
Brian Holtzleiter v. Angela Holtzleiter
48A02-1006-DR-736
Domestic relation. Reverses denial of Brian’s petition to modify child support. He hasn’t waived his argument
that he is entitled to modification of child support under the requirement that the current support obligation was 20 percent
different from what would be required under the guidelines and it had been at least a year since the support order was issued.
Remands for the issuance of a new child support order.
More
February 24, 2011
Indiana Court of Appeals
French
C. Mason v. State of Indiana
49A02-1005-CR-475
Criminal. Affirms convictions of Class D felonies resisting law enforcement and unlawful use of body armor. The trial court
had sufficient evidence to show Mason resisted law enforcement and his crime rose to the Class D felony level and to conclude
Mason intended to wear body armor in the aid of the felony of resisting law enforcement through the use of a vehicle.
More
February 23, 2011
Indiana Court of Appeals
Debra K. Sands v. Helen HCI, LLC
06A01-1005-CC-231
Civil collections. Reverses denial of Sands’ motion to enforce a settlement agreement between herself, Helen HCI LLC
and two other companies, providing for dismissal with prejudice of Helen HCI’s complaint against Sands in Indiana and
dismissal with prejudice of Sands’ complaint against Helen HCI and the other companies in a Wisconsin suit. The parties
entered into a binding contract which required the subsequent execution of a document memorializing their agreement and there
is no uncertainty as to any substantial term of the settlement contract.
More
February 22, 2011
7th Circuit Court of Appeals
United
States of America v. Roger D. Slone
09-4089
U.S. District Court, Northern District of Indiana, Hammond Division, Judge Rudy Lozano.
Criminal. Affirms conviction of conspiracy to distribute marijuana and sentence of 120 months in prison. The search incident
to his arrest was reasonable and the vehicle evidence was properly admitted against him.
More
February 21, 2011
Indiana Court of Appeals
Joshua Burke v. State of Indiana
49A02-1006-CR-660
Criminal. Affirms conviction of Class B felony burglary. Indiana Code Section 35-43-2-1(1)(B)(ii), which enhances burglary
from a Class C felony to Class B felony if the building or structure burgled is used for religious worship, does not violate
the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment or Article 1, Section 4 of the Indiana Constitution.
More
February 18, 2011
Indiana Court of Appeals
Term. of Parent-Child Rel. of M.W.; M.W. v. I.D.C.S.
32A01-1007-JT-322
Juvenile. Reverses termination of parental rights. Given the father’s efforts to comply with the amended plan and his
release from incarceration soon after the hearing date, the trial court’s findings aren’t supported by clear and
convincing evidence.
More
February 16, 2011
7th Circuit Court of Appeals
Jeff
Whitely, et al. v. Anthony Moravec, et al.
09-3302
U.S. District Court, Southern District of Indiana, Indianapolis Division. Judge David F. Hamilton.
Civil. Plaintiffs sued an Indiana company incorporated in New York to satisfy the penalty claims after the Indiana company
entered into bankruptcy and was late paying wages and fringe benefits. Affirms the District Court correctly concluded that
New York Bus. Corp. L. Section 630(a) doesn’t make defendants liable for a penalty under Indiana law.
More
February 15, 2011
Indiana Court of Appeals
K.D., et al. Alleged to be C.H.I.N.S.; S.S. v. Indiana Dept. of Child Services, et al.
49A02-1004-JC-462
Juvenile. Reverses and remands juvenile court’s adjudication that the appellant-respondent’s stepchildren were
children in need of services. Concludes that where, as here, one party admits to CHINS allegations while another denies them,
due process entitles the contesting party to a fact-finding hearing and adjudication. The mother admitted to the allegations
in the petition, but the stepfather denied the allegations and requested a fact-finding hearing.
More
February 14, 2011
7th Circuit Court of Appeals
Cynthia
Kartman, et al. v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co., et al.
09-1725
U.S. District Court, Southern District of Indiana, Indianapolis Division, Judge William T. Lawrence.
Civil. Reverses District Court ruling that a class claim for injunctive relief could proceed under Federal Rules of Civil
Procedure Rule 23(b)(2) and certification of a class to determine whether State Farm should be required to re-inspect policyholders’
roofs pursuant to a uniform and objective standard. There is no contract or tort-based duty requiring the insurer to use a
particular standard for assessing hail damage. Also, the requested injunction is neither appropriate nor final.
More
February 11, 2011
7th Circuit Court of Appeals
Mouhamadou M. Sow v. Fortville Police Department, et al.
10-2188
U.S. District Court, Southern District of Indiana, Indianapolis Division, Chief Judge Richard L. Young
Civil. Affirms District Court’s grant of summary judgment to the Fortville Police Department, Officer Michael Fuller
of the Fortville Police Department, and the McCordsville Police Department. Sow’s action was brought under 42 U.S.C.
sections 1983, 1985, and 1986 after he was arrest for forgery but the charges were later dropped. Sow also alleged numerous
state law claims, asserting that the District Court had supplemental jurisdiction over those claims.
More
February 10, 2011
Indiana Supreme Court
Killbuck Concerned Citizens Association v. J.M. Corporation and Ralph Reed
48S00-1003-PL-158
Civil plenary. Reverses trial court grant of J.M. Corporation’s motion for summary judgment on the grounds that Indiana
Code Section 13-20-2-11, which would require further review and approval of zoning, violated the Indiana Constitution and
remands for further proceedings. Declines to decide the constitutional issue, but finds because J.M. Corporation’s facilities
accepted wasted before April 1, 2008, Indiana Code Section 13-20-2-11 doesn’t apply.
More
February 9, 2011
Indiana Supreme Court
Indiana Dept. of State Revenue v. Belterra Resort Indiana, LLC
49S10-1010-TA-519
Tax. Grants rehearing to address the question of whether Belterra is subject to a tax penalty. Remands to the Indiana Tax
Court to determine the timeliness of Belterra’s argument and, if timely, whether Belterra is subject to the penalty
and, if so, whether the penalty should be waived. Affirms original opinion in all other respects. Justice Dickson concurs
in result, believing the rehearing should also be granted to revisit the previous decision on the “step transaction”
issue.
More
February 8, 2011
Indiana Supreme Court
Mariea L. Best v. Russell C. Best
06S05-1102-CV-73
Civil. Affirms trial court grant of primary physical custody of M.B. to father. The trial court made the necessary findings
that there has been a substantial change in one or more of the statutory factors and that the modification of physical custody
is in M.B.’s best interests. Reverses the finding that the mother is in contempt. Justice Sullivan dissented and would
deny transfer. Justice David did not participate.
More
February 7, 2011
Ricky E. Graham v. State of Indiana
22A01-1008-PC-392
Post conviction. Affirms post-conviction relief court properly rejected Graham’s claims of an inadequate factual basis
or ineffective assistance of appellate counsel, and claims of fundamental error. The PCR court’s findings don’t
support its rejection of his claim that his plea was illusory or involuntary. Remands for a new PCR hearing to address that
issue and the question of the effectiveness of his trial counsel on the grounds raised in his PCR petition, should he resubmit
his subpoena request for his trial counsel to appear at the new hearing.
More
February 4, 2011
Indiana Court of Appeals
Terry Likens, et al. v. Prickett's Properties, Inc., et al.
43A03-1008-PL-455
Civil plenary. Affirms summary judgment in favor of Prickett’s Properties Inc. and Realtor Jack Stump in the Likenses’
suit alleging negligence/breach of agency duty. According to Indiana Code Chapter 25-34.1-10, the only duty Stump owed the
sellers is to treat them honestly and not knowingly give them false information. The Likenses do not allege on appeal that
he breached this duty.
More
February 3, 2011
Indiana Supreme Court
Clifton Mauricio v. State of Indiana
02S03-1009-PC-501
Post conviction. Reverses denial of petition for post-conviction relief and remands for re-sentencing. The Supreme Court
cannot say that the trial court would have sentenced Mauricio to 50 years notwithstanding its reference to a statute that
was later held to be inapplicable.
More
February 2, 2011
The Indiana Supreme Court, Court of Appeals, and Tax Court are closed today due to the weather.
More
February 1, 2011
7th Circuit Court of Appeals
United
States of America v. Derrick L. Bullock
10-2238
U.S. District Court, Northern District of Indiana, Fort Wayne Division, Judge Theresa L. Springmann.
Criminal. Bullock pled guilty to possession with intent to distribute at least five grams but less than fifty grams of cocaine
base in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1). His plea was conditioned on his ability to appeal the District Court’s
denial of his motion to suppress evidence of the crack that led to his conviction. Affirms District Court ruling there was
reasonable suspicion to detain Bullock during the search, probable cause existed to arrest Bullock for visiting a common nuisance
under Indiana law after police found marijuana in plain view and other evidence of recurrent and widespread drug activity
within the residence. His detention was lawful under principles set forth in Terry v. Ohio, and the subsequent arrest was
supported by probable cause.
More
January 31, 2011
Indiana Court of Appeals
Cynthia L. Foley v. Robert L. Schwartz and Danny L. Collins
78A04-1005-CT-305
Civil tort. Reverses grant of Schwartz’s motion to dismiss Foley’s complaint following an ATV accident on Collins’
property. The trial court erred when it granted Schwartz’s motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction. Remands
for further proceedings.
More
January 28, 2011
Indiana Court of Appeals
Keith Eberle v. State of Indiana
58A01-1003-CR-105
Criminal. Affirms convictions of Class D felony intimidation, Class C felony stalking, and two counts of Class B misdemeanor
harassment due to text messages and phone calls from Eberle to an employer-issued cell phone that belonged to an Ohio County
jail matron.
More
January 26, 2011
7th Circuit Court of Appeals
United
States of America v. Ty Brock
10-2385
U.S. District Court, Northern District of Indiana, Hammond Division, Chief Judge Philip P. Simon.
Criminal. Affirms denial of motion to suppress items found in Brock’s car during a checkpoint stop. Because the checkpoint
was neither objectively nor subjectively intrusive in any way that would outweigh the government’s interest in operating
it, the checkpoint stop didn’t violate his Fourth Amendment rights.
More
January 25, 2011
Indiana Court of Appeals
Adoption of L.C.E.; D.H. v. J.H. and J.D.E.
47A05-1008-AD-474
Adoption. Reverses adoption of L.C.E. by his maternal grandfather J.D.E. The stepfather, D.H., had custody of L.C.E. and
his consent is required for the adoption of L.C.E. The trial court erred in granting the grandfather’s petition prior
to the expiration of the 30 days provided for objection to be filed and prior to receiving D.H.’s properly filed objection.
More
January 24, 2011
7th Circuit Court of Appeals
Applications
of Heraeus Kulzer, GmbH, for orders compelling discovery for use in a foreign proceeding v. Biomet Inc., et al.
09-2858, 10-2639
U.S. District Court, Northern District of Indiana, South Bend Division, Judge Robert L. Miller Jr.
Civil. Reverses denial of applications to compel discovery for use in a lawsuit pending in a foreign court. The District
Court committed two serious legal errors in its denial – concluding Heraeus Kulzer was trying to circumvent German law
and turning down the company’s discovery request flat. Remands for further proceedings consistent with the opinion.
More
vagueness cannot challenged, so let's write all laws vaguely and throw the constitution out the window.Even if the court is operating under a particular law, if they don't it they will change it to their liking. What a joke!!!
Two convictions becomes one conviction with exactly the same sentence, only it is not clear wheter or not that sentence will be 18 months, 120 months or 138 months. Actually if the guns were in a home, whether or not they were his, he is protected under the 2nd amendment. Jurors need to learn the law and the constitution before judging others. The cour5ts need to do this as well.
With all due respect, Rick, I think you probably would be making a mistake by going to law school. The job market for attorneys is so saturated, you may well find yourself unemployed and with a lot of debt. You mention law would be a good supplement to your skills. True. But employers unfortunately don't value that. You will find that a law degree may well pigeonhole you into an attorney slot and limit career options. If you have a good job now I would hold onto that. As an attorney, you may well end up making less with the aforementioned debt.
Jack, I was only responding to bill's comment of tying everybody in government together. I agree with you though, it takes one bad apple to ruin the bunch.. As in any profession. What's truly unfair is when somebody violates someone's trust and takes complete advantage of someone
John’s comment is unfair. The majority of attorneys can be trusted. Unfortunately, all it takes is one greedy, unscrupulous, immoral attorney to jade the public.