November 10, 2010
Indiana Court of Appeals
Scott D. Wells v. Herman Bud Bernitt, et al.
53A01-0910-CV-494
Civil. Affirms summary judgment in favor of the Bernitts on Wells’ claim against them for defamation because there
was no admissible evidence before the court to establish actual malice, an element of defamation. Affirms summary judgment
in favor of J.D. Maxwell and Travis Coryea as to Wells’ claim for negligent and intentional torts finding the evidence
establishes the officers didn’t use excessive force. Affirms summary judgment for Wells on the Bernitts’ cross
appeal alleging abuse of process.
More
November 9, 2010
Indiana Court of Appeals
Anthony A. Parish v. State of Indiana
02A03-1002-CR-74
Criminal. Affirms Parish’s convictions of murder, Class B felony robbery, and Class A misdemeanor carrying a handgun
without a license, and his sentence to an aggregate term of 86 years of incarceration. On appeal, Parish claimed a protective
search of a locked glove box during a traffic stop was constitutionally improper, and therefore evidence found during the
search should have been suppressed. COA concluded the protective search was permissible under the Fourth Amendment.
More
November 8, 2010
Indiana Court of Appeals
Timothy Cranston v. State of Indiana
29A02-1003-CR-374
Criminal. Affirms conviction of Class A misdemeanor operating a vehicle while intoxicated with an alcohol concentration of
0.15 or greater. The admission of the Datamaster machine printed ticket stating his BAC without live testimony from the equipment
technician didn’t violate Cranston’s Sixth Amendment right to confrontation.
More
November 5, 2010
Indiana Court of Appeals
S.A. v. Review Board
93A02-1004-EX-568
Civil. Affirms the Review Board of the Indiana Department of Workforce Development’s ruling that S.A.’s acceptance
of an early retirement package made her ineligible to continue receiving unemployment benefits. S.A. left employment without
good cause in connection with the work.
More
November 4, 2010
Indiana Court of Appeals
DBL Axel LLC v. Lasalle Bank National Association
15A01-1003-PL-205
Civil plenary. Affirms order directing immediate turnover of funds in favor of LaSalle Bank. The checks paid by the city
of Lawrenceburg to DBL concerned the property in question and were within the scope of and subject to the receivership order,
and DBL’s failure to include that money paid or otherwise notify the receiver of the settlement agreement was a violation
of that order. Remands for the trial court to amend its order directing immediate turnover of funds and enter an order directing
turnover in the amount of $1,365,500.
More
November 3, 2010
Indiana Court of Appeals
James K. Oberst v. State of Indiana
14A05-1003-PC-157
Post conviction. Affirms denial of petition for post-conviction relief. Because Oberst gave his statement that he had sex
with the victim to police in counsel’s presence before adversary criminal proceedings had been initiated, he had no
Sixth Amendment right to counsel and therefore no right to the effective assistance of counsel.
More
November 2, 2010
The Indiana Supreme Court, Indiana Court of Appeals, and Indiana Tax Court were closed in observance of Election Day.
More
November 1, 2010
Indiana Court of Appeals
Michael J. Shepard v. State of Indiana (NFP)
82A05-1002-CR-94
Criminal. Affirms conviction of Class D felony resisting law enforcement and Class C misdemeanor operating a vehicle with
an alcohol concentration of 0.08 or more
More
October 29, 2010
Indiana Court of Appeals
John Taele and Sarah Taele v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.
06A01-1004-CT-259
Civil tort. Affirms summary judgment in favor of State Farm. The Taeles aren’t entitled to recover uninsured motorist
benefits under their State Farm policy because they themselves were neither directly impacted nor directly physically injured
by the accident that killed their daughter. Judge Crone dissents.
More
October 28, 2010
Indiana Court of Appeals
Robert D. Davis v. State of Indiana
32A01-1003-CR-144
Criminal. Affirms denial of Davis’ motion for leave to amend his motion to correct erroneous sentence. The information
before the appellate court doesn’t allow it to decide whether he was erroneously sentenced.
More
October 27, 2010
7th Circuit Court of Appeals
James L. Parkey v. Jason E. Sample
09-3966
U.S. District Court, Northern District of Indiana, South Bend Division, Judge William C. Lee
Civil. Affirms District Court’s grant of Indiana State Trooper Jason Sample’s motion for summary judgment, which
found James Parkey, who sued under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, had not brought forth any evidence to demonstrate a lack of probable
cause. Parkey claimed Sample had violated his rights under the Fourth Amendment by searching his home and seizing his property
without probable cause. Suspecting Parkey had a marijuana grow operation, Sample did two trash pulls near Parkey’s residence
where Sample found marijuana cigarettes and stems from marijuana plants, evidence he presented to a Lake County Superior magistrate,
who issued a search warrant for Parkey’s home.
More
October 26, 2010
Indiana Court of Appeals
Allstate Insurance Company v. Timothy Clancy, et al.
45A03-0910-CV-498
Civil. Reverses trial court’s order granting a motion to compel the production of documents. In its interlocutory appeal,
Allstate Insurance Company raised the following issue: whether the trial court abused its discretion by compelling production
of documents subject to the attorney-client privilege on the ground that Allstate has implicitly raised an advice of counsel
defense, thereby waiving the attorney-client privilege.
More
October 25, 2010
Indiana Court of Appeals
Alesa Pack v. Indiana Family and Social Services Administration
89A05-1004-PL-240
Civil plenary. Reverses denial of Medicaid benefits. The administrative law judge’s decision is defective for failing
to consider the totality of the evidence provided and in its presentation of and engagement with the findings of basic fact
when applying the law to reach a finding of ultimate fact that Pack’s health conditions didn’t substantially impair
her ability to work. Remands to the ALJ for further proceedings.
More
October 22, 2010
Indiana Court of Appeals
Belle City Amusements, Inc. v. Doorway Promotions, Inc.
35A05-0912-CV-711
Civil. Reverses award of damages for lost profits for the years 2010 through 2013 in the amount of $17,500 for each year
to Doorway after Belle City cancelled its agreement with the company to provide rides and concessions for a festival. The
damages were not a foreseeable consequence of the breach of the agreement between Belle City and Doorway and Indiana doesn’t
allow for recovery for perceived loss of reputation or goodwill in an action for breach of contract. Affirms $24,000 award
to Doorway for the 2009 rent of the Coliseum to house the festival. Remands for further proceedings.
More
October 21, 2010
Indiana Court of Appeals
Brenda Moore v. State of Indiana
49A04-1001-CR-46
Criminal. Reverses conviction of Class B misdemeanor public intoxication. Under the circumstances, Moore was not in a public
place and therefore the evidence is insufficient to support a conviction of public intoxication. Judge Vaidik dissents.
More
October 20, 2010
Indiana Court of Appeals
J.B. v. E.B.
34A04-1002-DR-110
Domestic relation. Reverses trial court decision to exclude son’s counseling records at a custody modification hearing.
The instant case is a proceeding within the purview of Indiana Code Section 31-32-11-1 and the counselor/client privilege
does not apply. Remands for further proceedings.
More
October 18, 2010
7th Circuit Court of Appeals
Tom
George, et al. v. National Collegiate Athletic Association
09-3667
U.S. District Court, Southern District of Indiana, Indianapolis Division, Judge William T. Lawrence.
Civil. Vacates opinion reversing District Court’s dismissal of claims with prejudice, stays the appeal, and certifies
three questions to the Indiana Supreme Court: Do the plaintiffs’ allegations about the NCAA’s method for allocating
scarce tickets to championship tournaments describe a lottery that would be unlawful under Indiana law? If the plaintiffs’
allegations describe an unlawful lottery, would the NCAA’s method for allocating tickets fall within the Ind. Code Section
35-45-5-1(d) exception for “bona fide business transactions that are valid under the law of contracts”? If the
plaintiffs’ allegations describe an unlawful lottery, do plaintiffs’ allegations show that their claims are subject
to an in pari delecto defense as described in
Lesher v. Baltimore Football Club and
Swain v. Bussell?
More
October 14, 2010
Indiana Court of Appeals
Town of Culver Board of Zoning Appeals v. Roderick J. Ratcliff and Pamela A. Ratcliff
50A03-1004-MI-179
Miscellaneous. Affirms judgment in favor of the Ratcliffs on their petition for writ of certiorari from an adverse decision
of the Board of Zoning Appeals. The storage sheds on a landscaped gravel lot supplied with electricity aren’t considered
“structures” within the definition of Culver’s zoning ordinances.
More
October 13, 2010
7th Circuit Court of Appeals
United
States of America v. Cruz Saenz
U.S. District Court, Southern District of Indiana, Indianapolis Division, Judge Sarah Evans Barker.
Criminal. Affirms conviction of conspiring to distribute more than 5 kilograms of cocaine but vacates his 293-month sentence.
Rejects Saenz’s speedy trial challenge because nearly all of the delay is attributable to requests by Saenz or his co-defendants
and the court didn’t error in imposing an obstruction of justice enhancement by concluding Saenz willfully lied about
whether he knew the money he was transporting was drug money. Remands for the District Court to reconsider whether Saenz should
receive the minor role adjustment as there is no evidence in the record of his involvement in a conspiracy beyond the single
transport of money.
More
October 12, 2010
7th Circuit Court of Appeals
United
States of America and State of New York, et al. v. Cinergy Corp., et al.
No. 1:99-CV-1693
U.S. District Court, Southern District of Indiana, Indianapolis Division, Judge Larry J. McKinney.
Civil. Reverses District Court ruling in the government’s favor regarding modifications involving sulphur dioxide emissions
because Cinergy met the standard that was authorized by a state plan the Environmental Protection Agency approved. Finds the
District Court should not have admitted evidence by the EPA’s expert witnesses. Rules that without expert testimony
to support an estimate of actual emissions caused by the modifications, the government cannot prevail with respect to the
charge of nitrogen oxide pollution. Dismisses cross-appeal.
More
October 11, 2010
The Indiana Supreme Court, Court of Appeals, and Tax Court were closed today in observance of Columbus Day.
More
October 8, 2010
Indiana Court of Appeals
Richmond State Hospital, et al. v. Paula Brattain, et al.
49A02-0908-CV-718
Civil. Reverses finding that the merit employees, represented by Veregge and Strong, are entitled to 20 years of back pay
and remands with instructions to recalculate the merit employees’ back pay based on the time period beginning 10 days
before the July 29, 1993, complaint was filed and ending when the state abolished the split class system. Instructs the trial
court to determine whether the state abolished the split class system on Sept. 12 or Sept. 19, 1993. Affirms in all other
respects.
More
I highly recommend Deanna and her team of professionals that serve the legal community. Great information and many thanks for sharing.
they are pushing these cases against lawyers too far. thought-crime.
vagueness cannot challenged, so let's write all laws vaguely and throw the constitution out the window.Even if the court is operating under a particular law, if they don't it they will change it to their liking. What a joke!!!
Two convictions becomes one conviction with exactly the same sentence, only it is not clear wheter or not that sentence will be 18 months, 120 months or 138 months. Actually if the guns were in a home, whether or not they were his, he is protected under the 2nd amendment. Jurors need to learn the law and the constitution before judging others. The cour5ts need to do this as well.
With all due respect, Rick, I think you probably would be making a mistake by going to law school. The job market for attorneys is so saturated, you may well find yourself unemployed and with a lot of debt. You mention law would be a good supplement to your skills. True. But employers unfortunately don't value that. You will find that a law degree may well pigeonhole you into an attorney slot and limit career options. If you have a good job now I would hold onto that. As an attorney, you may well end up making less with the aforementioned debt.