December 19, 2012
7th Circuit Court of Appeals
Norman
W. Bernstein, et al. v. Patricia A. Bankert, et al. and Auto Owners Mutual Insurance Co.
11-1501, 11-1523
U.S. District Court, Southern District of Indiana, Indianapolis Division, Chief Judge Richard L. Young.
Civil. Reverses dismissal of counts I, II, III and VII. In Count I, the trustees have made a timely CERCLA claim, under 42
U.S.C. § 9607(a)(4)(B), to recover costs incurred pursuant to the 2002 AOC. The trustees’ Count II “companion
claim” for a declaratory judgment of CERCLA liability is therefore also reinstated. Finds that the Indiana ELA claim
contained in Count III is timely, and that the declaratory judgment claim contained in Count VII is not moot. The District
Court committed no abuse of discretion in its handling of the summary judgment briefing process. Finally, affirms the District
Court’s denial of Auto Owners’ motion for summary judgment on preclusion grounds. The trustees’ suit is
reinstated and remanded for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.
More
December 18, 2012
Indiana Court of Appeals
Timothy Schepers v. State of Indiana
22A01-1201-CR-39
Criminal. Affirms on interlocutory appeal a trial court denial of a motion to dismiss several drug charges and a Class C
felony count of neglect of a dependent. The court held that Schepers’ filing of a pro se motion for a speedy trial and
motion to dismiss for violation of Criminal Rule 4 were filed while he was represented by a public defender and that he did
not clearly and unequivocally assert his right to self-representation. Remands cause for trial.
More
December 14, 2012
Indiana Court of Appeals
Brenda Alexander v. Donald Alexander
32A05-1108-DR-417
Domestic relations. Affirms in a divided opinion the trial court denial of a motion to correct error of the court’s
omission of an award for incapacity maintenance for Brenda Alexander. She claimed that testimony of her disabilities and court
findings supported an award, but the majority held that the trial court did not abuse its discretion on ruling that such an
award was not warranted.
More
December 12, 2012
Indiana Court of Appeals
Ponziano Construction Services, Inc. v. Quadri Enterprises, LLC
45A05-1112-CC-661
Civil collection. Reverses award of $16,000 to Ponziano on its breach of contract claim against Quadri and the denial of
Ponziano’s rquest to foreclose on its mechanic’s lien. Affirms the award of $8,000 in attorney fees to Ponziano
and remands with instructions to the trial court to enter judgment in favor of Ponziano for $48,483.43, order sale of the
property subject to the $45,549.43 lien, and determine the existence, extent, and outcome of a potential priority dispute
between Ponziano and Wells Fargo.
More
December 11, 2012
Indiana Court of Appeals
Paul Henry Gingerich v. State of Indiana
43A05-1101-CR-27
Criminal. Reverses conviction of Class A felony conspiracy to commit murder and remands for further proceedings. The juvenile
court abused its discretion when it denied Gingerich’s request for a continuance.
More
December 10, 2012
Indiana Court of Appeals
David Vance v. Francisco Lozano, et al.
02A03-1203-SC-142
Small claim. Reverses judgment in favor of Rock Solid and Lozano on Vance’s breach of contract claim. Finds the parties
entered into an enforceable settlement agreement.
More
December 7, 2012
Indiana Court of Appeals
Terry L. Brown v. Tammy S. Brown
77A01-1204-PL-180
Civil plenary. Reverses civil judgment in favor of Terry Brown’s ex-wife. The trial court abused its discretion when
it admitted evidence regarding criminal offenses he committed more than 20 years ago. Remands for further proceedings.
More
December 6, 2012
Indiana Court of Appeals
Connie Yates, Rick Yates, Jason Tibbs, and Pauline
Tibbs v. Levi Wayne Kemp
50A04-1204-CT-192
Civil tort. Reverses grant of partial summary judgment to Kemp on the Yateses’ and Tibbses’ claims for nuisance.
Based on the plain language of I.C. 14-22-31.5-6 and its context in the act as a whole, Kemp is not shielded by section 6
from liability related to his neighbors’ nuisance claims arising from noise pollution. There is also a material fact
as to whether Kemp has caused his neighbors to experience inconvenience, annoyance or discomfort.
More
December 5, 2012
7th Circuit Court of Appeals
United
States of America v. Gregory Wolfe
11-3281
U.S. District Court, Northern District of Indiana, Hammond Division, Judge Rudy Lozano.
Criminal. Affirms convictions of bank theft and interstate transportation of stolen goods for Wolfe’s role in a copper
theft scheme and his 88-month sentence, followed by concurrent three-year terms of supervised release, and order of more than
$3 million in restitution. Wolfe argued that he was deprived of a fair trial because of statements the prosecutor made during
closing argument. He also challenged the sentence and restitution order. Wolfe’s contentions lack merit.
More
December 4, 2012
Indiana Court of Appeals
Jerry Vanzyll v. State of Indiana
34A02-1111-CR-1050
Criminal. Affirms in part, reverses in part and remands to the trial court convictions of Class B felony dealing in methamphetamine,
Class D felonies of possession of meth and possession of chemical reagents or precursors with intent to manufacture a controlled
substance, and Class A misdemeanor resisting law enforcement. The court affirmed the drug convictions but ordered the resisting
conviction vacated because it held there was insufficient evidence to prove that Vanzyll fled.
More
December 3, 2012
Indiana Court of Appeals
State of Indiana v. Terry J. Hough
64A05-1203-MI-113
Criminal. Affirms trial court’s grant of a petition that Hough’s name be removed from the Indiana Sex Offender
Registry, holding that requiring him to register for a Pennsylvania rape committed before the establishment of the registry
would violate the Indiana Constitution’s prohibition of ex post facto laws.
More
November 30, 2012
Indiana Supreme Court
State of Indiana Ex Rel., Indiana Supreme Court Disciplinary Commission v. Derek A. Farmer
94S00-1103-MS-165
Attorney discipline. Rejected petition to enjoin unauthorized practice of law, holding that the Disciplinary Commission failed
to prove that Farmer had engaged in the unauthorized practice of law, and failed to convince the court that Farmer could not
have reasonably expected to be authorized for temporary admission due to a pending disciplinary proceeding.
More
November 28, 2012
Indiana Court of Appeals
Richard Thomas v. Indiana Bureau of Motor Vehicles
64A03-1204-PL-191
Civil plenary. Affirms suspension of Thomas’ driving privileges for 10 years due to qualifying as a habitual traffic
violator. The BMV timely notified Thomas that he qualified as a habitual traffic violator and the doctrine of laches is not
applicable to the instant matter.
More
November 27, 2012
Indiana Court of Appeals
Kirstan Haub, d/b/a American Handyman Service v. Jenny Eldridge
10A01-1203-PL-107
Civil plenary. Reverses denial of Haub’s motion for summary judgment against Eldridge. The trial court erred in considering
parol evidence, and the release unambiguously releases Haub from any and all claims that Eldridge may have had against him
on or before Oct. 8, 2010. Orders trial court to enter summary judgment in favor of Haub.
More
November 21, 2012
7th Circuit Court of Appeals
United
States of America v. William Hagler
11-2984
U.S. District Court, Northern District of Indiana, Fort Wayne Division, Judge William C. Lee.
Criminal. Affirms conviction of attempted bank robbery. Hagler argued that the government waited too long to indict him,
that the evidence was insufficient to convict him, and that new DNA testing entitles him to a new trial.
More
November 20, 2012
7th Circuit Court of Appeals
United
States of America v. Lincoln Plowman
11-3781
U.S. District Court, Southern District of Indiana, Indianapolis Division, Judge Larry J. McKinney.
Criminal. Affirms Plowman’s convictions of federal funds bribery and attempted extortion under color of official right.
The District Court did not err when it precluded him from arguing entrapment to the jury.
More
November 16, 2012
Indiana Court of Appeals
Marybeth Lebo v. State of Indiana
46A05-1202-CR-104
Criminal. Affirms trial court’s judgment in denying motion to dismiss charges of failure to report child abuse or neglect.
Lebo argued the charges were not permissible because they came after the statute of limitations had passed but the COA disagreed,
finding the Legislature’s intent was to make the failure to report a continuing offense. Otherwise, the court stated,
the duty to report would be limited to the day on which the individual comes to believe abuse is taking place.
More
November 14, 2012
Indiana Court of Appeals
John Fox v. Nichter Construction Co., Inc.
03A01-1202-SC-52
Small claims/wages. Affirms in part, reverses in part and remands in part the dismissal of Fox’s wage claim with prejudice
and orders the court to enter a dismissal of the claim with prejudice. A divided appeals court held that the trial court erred
in dismissing the complaint because it lacked subject matter jurisdiction because Fox had pursued his claim through the Department
of Labor under the Wage Claim statute before filing suit. The appeals court ordered the trial court to dismiss the case without
prejudice for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted, including the failure to name the real party in interest.
Fox may refile his claim setting forth the reassignment by the Department of Labor.
More
November 13, 2012
Indiana Supreme Court
D.C. v. J.A.C.
32S04-1206-DR-349
Domestic relation/modification of custody. Reverses Court of Appeals ruling that overturned a trial court modification of
a custody order in favor of a child’s father. In a case involving a mother who was moving out of state, the Supreme
Court held that the Court of Appeals erred by failing to apply a highly deferential standard of review to the trial court’s
determination of a custody modification based on testimony regarding the best interests of the child.
More
vagueness cannot challenged, so let's write all laws vaguely and throw the constitution out the window.Even if the court is operating under a particular law, if they don't it they will change it to their liking. What a joke!!!
Two convictions becomes one conviction with exactly the same sentence, only it is not clear wheter or not that sentence will be 18 months, 120 months or 138 months. Actually if the guns were in a home, whether or not they were his, he is protected under the 2nd amendment. Jurors need to learn the law and the constitution before judging others. The cour5ts need to do this as well.
With all due respect, Rick, I think you probably would be making a mistake by going to law school. The job market for attorneys is so saturated, you may well find yourself unemployed and with a lot of debt. You mention law would be a good supplement to your skills. True. But employers unfortunately don't value that. You will find that a law degree may well pigeonhole you into an attorney slot and limit career options. If you have a good job now I would hold onto that. As an attorney, you may well end up making less with the aforementioned debt.
Jack, I was only responding to bill's comment of tying everybody in government together. I agree with you though, it takes one bad apple to ruin the bunch.. As in any profession. What's truly unfair is when somebody violates someone's trust and takes complete advantage of someone
John’s comment is unfair. The majority of attorneys can be trusted. Unfortunately, all it takes is one greedy, unscrupulous, immoral attorney to jade the public.