November 6, 2012
Indiana Supreme Court
State of Indiana v. Elvis Holtsclaw
49S02-1205-CR-264
Criminal. Reverses dismissal of state’s notice of appeal and remands to the Court of Appeals for consideration of its
merits, holding that the appeal is timely under Appellate Rule 9.
More
November 2, 2012
Indiana Court of Appeals
Joshua A. Bostic v. State of Indiana
12A02-1202-CR-154
Criminal. Affirms convictions of Cass C felony attempted battery by means of a deadly weapon and criminal recklessness; Class
D felony arson; Class A misdemeanor criminal mischief; and Class B misdemeanor criminal mischief, holding that Bostic waived
his right to appeal under Criminal Rule 4(C) by failing to object to trial delays before the trial court. The court also found
he likewise waived his right to appeal the process for appointing a special judge. Remands to the trial court to correct the
sentencing order, abstract of judgment, and chronological case summary to reflect that Bostic’s 12-year habitual offender
enhancement is an enhancement to his sentence for felony criminal recklessness, and not a separate conviction.
More
November 1, 2012
Indiana Court of Appeals
Leslie Bridges v. Veolia Water Indianapolis, LLC, Veolia Water North America Operating Service, LLC,
and The City of Indianapolis, Dept. of Waterworks
49A02-1112-CC-1097
Civil collection. Affirms trial court dismissal of Bridges’ class action filed after her water was turned off for nonpayment,
finding Bridges failed to exhaust the administrative remedies available at the Indiana Utilities Regulatory Commission. She
had to seek those remedies before seeking judicial relief. Concludes that I.C. 8-1-2-68 through -70 grant the IURC exclusive
jurisdiction over Bridges’ claim regardless of whether it is treated as a challenge to and request for reimbursement
of the reconnect fee or as a challenge to the allegedly improper act of terminating her residential water service in a manner
inconsistent with the terms of the tariff.
More
October 31, 2012
Indiana Court of Appeals
Robertson Fowler v. State of Indiana
49A05-1202-PC-68
Post conviction. Affirms denial of petition for post-conviction relief. Fowler received a benefit at the time he entered
into his plea bargain, so he may not now challenge the sentence as illegal.
More
October 30, 2012
Indiana Supreme Court
Lisa J. Kane v. State of Indiana
30S04-1206-CR-372
Criminal. Reverses conviction of Class D felony receiving stolen property and remands for retrial. The trial court improperly
instructed the jury on the mental state required to convict Kane.
More
October 29, 2012
Indiana Court of Appeals
Betty J. Angel v. Kent H. Powelson and Marjorie A. Powelson
82A04-1205-PL-292
Civil plenary. Affirms order granting part of the Powelsons’ summary judgment motion on Angel’s claims of reformation
of a deed and adverse possession. The undisputed evidence shows that both Angel and the Powelsons were granted an easement
to use the roadway and both used it for ingress and egress purposes. The evidence also supports Angel’s claim for reformation
of a deed is barred by laches.
More
October 25, 2012
Indiana Court of Appeals
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company v. Ken Nunn Law Office
49A02-1202-CT-68
Civil tort. Reverses denial of State Farm’s motion for summary judgment on the law office’s attempt to recover
attorney fees and remands for further proceedings. The law office may not seek payment of a former client’s attorney
fees from State Farm under an equitable attorney fee lien or based on a theory of quantum meruit.
More
October 24, 2012
Indiana Court of Appeals
Leslie Ann Grider v. State of Indiana
48A02-1112-CR-1156
Criminal. Reverses 19-year sentence following guilty pleas to two counts of Class C felony forgery, four counts of Class
D felony theft, and two counts of Class D felony check fraud. The language of the plea agreement indicates the parties’
intention that the trial court would impose concurrent sentences on all counts regardless of the separate cause numbers. Orders
Grider’s sentences to be concurrent for a total of eight years.
More
October 23, 2012
7th Circuit Court of Appeals
Planned
Parenthood of Indiana, Inc., et al., v. Commissioner of the Indiana State Department of Health, et al.
11-2464
Civil. Reverses in part and affirms in part, affirming the district court injunction against I.C. 5-22-17-5.5(b) that bars
state or federal funding for “any entity that performs abortions or maintains or operates a facility where abortions
are performed.” The circuit court held that Medicaid grants individual rights under federal civil rights protections,
but reversed the district court with regard to federal block grant funds, holding that no such actionable protection exists.
More
October 19, 2012
Indiana Court of Appeals
Rodney Killebrew II v. State of Indiana
34A02-1204-CR-303
Criminal. Reserves a conviction of possession of marijuana after concluding the trial court abused its discretion when it
admitted evidence obtained at an illegal traffic stop. The court found the police officer had no grounds to stop the driver
because the continuous use of a turn signal is not a traffic violation and the officer’s actions did not fall within
his community caretaking function.
More
October 18, 2012
Indiana Court of Appeals
John A. Dugan v. State of Indiana
49A05-1202-PC-50
Post conviction. Reverses denial of petition for post-conviction relief. The court erred when it denied Dugan’s claim
that Mills applied retroactively to his habitual offender enhancement. Remands for the court to vacate that enhancement.
More
October 17, 2012
Indiana Supreme Court
J.M. v. Review Board of the Indiana Dept. of Workforce Development and T.C.
Agency appeal. Finds the court may rely on a different statutory ground of a just cause finding than the one relied upon
by the review board when, as here, the review board’s findings of fact clearly establish the alternate subsection’s
applicability. Affirms the review board under Indiana Code section 22-4-15-1(d)(5), that J.M. refused to obey instructions,
and was thus fired for just cause. Affirms denial of unemployment benefits.
More
October 16, 2012
Indiana Court of Appeals
Charles Mitchell v. State of Indiana
49A02-1202-CR-125
Criminal. Affirms conviction and sentence for Class D felony theft. The evidence is sufficient to show Mitchell and the other
defendants knowingly exerted unauthorized control over the apartment complex’s water heater with the intent to deprive
the apartments of any part of its value or use. The advisory sentence imposed, with all but 60 days suspended to probation,
was not inappropriate.
More
October 15, 2012
Indiana Court of Appeals
Ted L. Cecil, Cecil Septic LLC, and Max Haas Company, LLC v. Fisk Excavating, Plumbing and Septic
Services, Inc., Dennis Fisk, Dennis Fisk, Jr.,Michelle Fisk, Bob Murphy, et al. (NFP)
33A05-1112-MI-686
Miscellaneous. Affirms summary judgment in favor of Fisk Excavating and other defendants on the plaintiffs’ legal malpractice
claim. Remands for determination of Gregg Morelock’s appellate attorney fees.
More
October 12, 2012
Indiana Court of Appeals
Jeffrey Riggs and Mark Ashmann v. Mark S. Weinberger, M.D., Mark Weinberger, M.D., P.C., Merrillville
Center for Advanced Surgery, LLC, and Nose and Sinus Center, LLC
45A03-1109-CT-394
Civil tort. Reaffirms original opinion in all respects, and finds that a trial court when confronted with the facts and circumstances
like those in this case, may compel an involuntary psychiatric examination in accordance with Ind. Trial Rule 35. There is
no requirement that the court must do so.
More
October 10, 2012
7th Circuit Court of Appeals
Charles
R. Kastner v. Michael J. Astrue, Commissioner of Social Security
11-1166
U.S. District Court, Southern District of Indiana, Evansville Division, Magistrate Judge William G. Hussmann Jr.
Civil. Reverses denial of disability benefits, finding the administrative law judge did not adequately explain why Kastner
had not met the requirements for a presumptive disability. Remands for further proceedings.
More
October 5, 2012
Indiana Court of Appeals
Heartland Crossing Foundation, Inc. v. Chris M. Dotlich
55A01-1203-SC-119
Small claims. Affirms judgment in favor of Dotlich on a breach of contract claim, holding that the trial court did not err
in rejecting Heartland’s claim for attorney fees assessed on the late payment of homeowner association dues. The trial
court had called an “administrative fee” assessed to Dotlich “nothing more than an abusive junk fee.”
More
October 4, 2012
7th Circuit Court of Appeals
Angelina
Povey v. City of Jeffersonville, Indiana
11-1896
U.S. District Court, Southern District of Indiana, New Albany Division, Judge Richard L. Young.
Civil. Affirms summary judgment for the city on Povey’s claim that her termination of employment by the city animal
shelter violated the Americans with Disabilities Act and on her retaliation claim. Povey failed to meet her burden to demonstrate
that she was disabled under the ADA and is not protected by its provisions.
More
October 3, 2012
Indiana Court of Appeals
Steven B. Steele v. State of Indiana
49A05-1202-CR-54
Criminal. Affirms denial of motion to suppress. Evidence Rule 617 does not apply in this case because the police officer’s
interrogation of Steele did not occur in a place of detention. The rule also does not explicitly or implicitly impose an affirmative
duty on law enforcement officers to transport a person to a place of detention before conducting a custodial interrogation.
More
October 2, 2012
Indiana Court of Appeals
Moise Joseph v. State of Indiana
82A05-1108-CR-387
Criminal. Reverses convictions of Class A felony burglary resulting in serious bodily injury, Class B felony attempted armed
robbery and Class B felony criminal confinement. The trial court abused its discretion in admitting Joseph’s statements
to the police detective.
More
Jack, I was only responding to bill's comment of tying everybody in government together. I agree with you though, it takes one bad apple to ruin the bunch.. As in any profession. What's truly unfair is when somebody violates someone's trust and takes complete advantage of someone
John’s comment is unfair. The majority of attorneys can be trusted. Unfortunately, all it takes is one greedy, unscrupulous, immoral attorney to jade the public.
In regards to bill's comment about trusting the cover meant. We can trust them about as much as we can trust attorneys'.
This is disturbing to learn...
Yikes!