August 28, 2012
7th Circuit Court of Appeals
Angela
M. Farrell v. Michael J. Astrue, Commissioner of Social Security
11-3589
Civil. Reverses District Court’s affirmation of the decision to deny disability insurance benefits. The Social Security
Administration Appeals Council did not follow its own regulations which require it to consider “new and material evidence.”
Also finds the administrative law judge’s residual functional capacity determination is based on an incomplete assessment
of the record. Remands for further proceedings.
More
August 27, 2012
Indiana Court of Appeals
Ian
McCullough v. State of Indiana
49A02-1106-PC-571
Post-conviction relief. Affirms post-conviction court’s judgment that trial counsel was not ineffective, holding that
McCullough failed to carry his burden to show that the evidence as a whole leads unerringly and unmistakably to a conclusion
opposite that reached by the post-conviction court.
More
August 23, 2012
Indiana Court of Appeals
Konrad
Motor and Welder Service, Inc., Konrad Lambrecht, and Sharon Lambrecht v. Magnetech Industrial Services, Inc.
45A04-1203-CC-109
Civil collection. Reverses summary judgment for Magnetech and piercing Konrad Electric’s corporate veil because there
are genuine issues of material fact. Affirms summary judgment for Magnetch on whether Konrad Motor and Welder Service is the
alter ego of Konrad Electric. Remands for determination whether Konrad Electric’s corporate veil should be pierced and
liability imposed upon the Lambrechts. If pierced, Konrad and Sharon Lambrecht may be held individually liable. Judge Crone
concurs in part and dissents in part.
More
August 22, 2012
Indiana Court of Appeals
Ashley
T. Tucker v. Michelle R. Harrison, M.D.
79A05-1108-CT-404
Civil tort. Affirms judgment in favor of Dr. Harrison on Tucker’s medical malpractice complaint. The trial court did
not abuse its discretion in excluding Tucker’s expert testimony, limiting her questioning of a witness about possible
bias, or in instructing the jury.
More
August 21, 2012
Indiana Court of Appeals
Jason
Fields v. State of Indiana
47A04-1110-CR-577
Criminal. Affirms two convictions of Class B felony dealing in methamphetamine. The trial court’s response to the jury’s
mid-deliberation question did not constitute a modification of the jury instructions.
More
August 20, 2012
7th Circuit Court of Appeals
Joshua
Resendez v. Brian Smith
11-1121
U.S. District Court, Southern District of Indiana, Indianapolis Division, Judge Sarah Evans Barker.
Civil. Affirms dismissal of petition for writ of habeas corpus, in which Resendez claimed the state denied him his constitutional
right to counsel in a sentence correction proceeding under I.C. 35-38-1-15. His claims may not be presented via that
statute as his motion is a collateral challenge to his sentence.
More
August 17, 2012
7th Circuit Court of Appeals
Amerisure
Insurance Co. v. National Surety Corp. v. Scottsdale Insurance Co.
11-2762, 11-2771
U.S. District Court, Southern District of Indiana, Indianapolis Division, Judge William T. Lawrence.
Civil. Affirms breakdown that Amerisure, Scottsdale, and National are liable for $1 million, $1 million and $900,000, respectively,
of the $2.9 million settlement a steel worker won after injuring himself on the job. Declines to apply the ‘mend-the-hold’
doctrine in this case, and Amerisure and National were not prejudiced by Scottsdale’s litigation conduct.
More
August 16, 2012
7th Circuit Court of Appeals
Thomas
Rosenbaum, et al. v. Beau J. White, et al.
11-3224
U.S. District Court, Northern District of Indiana, Fort Wayne Division, Judge Theresa L. Springmann.
Civil. Affirms summary judgment for the attorney defendants in a lawsuit filed by investors in a failed business alleging
state and federal RICO violations, conversion, securities fraud, common-law fraud, civil conspiracy, and legal malpractice.
More
August 15, 2012
Indiana Court of Appeals
Reko
D. Levels v. State of Indiana
82A01-1201-CR-25
Criminal. Reverses convictions of battery and public intoxication as Class B misdemeanors. Levels did not validly waive his
right to a jury trial.
More
August 14, 2012
7th Circuit Court of Appeals
Jason
Halasa v. ITT Educational Services Inc.
11-3305
Civil. Affirms summary judgment ruling and costs in favor of ITT. Jason Halasa, who directed the company’s Lathrop,
Calif., campus for six months in 2009, sued the school on a claim that his rights were violated under the False Claims Act.
ITT said Halasa was fired for showing poor management skills and delivering inadequate results.
More
August 13, 2012
Indiana Court of Appeals
CSL
Community Association, Inc. v. Clarence Ray Meador
40A01-1112-MI-579
Miscellaneous. Reverses trial court’s grant of Meador’s motion for declaratory judgment that abrogated his obligation
to pay homeowner’s association dues, finding that the evidence does not support the trial court’s conclusion that
the changes in the community were so radical that the original purpose of the community and the deed restrictions were destroyed,
and that the trial court erred in abrogating Meador’s obligation to pay dues and assessments.
More
August 10, 2012
Indiana Court of Appeals
HDNET
LLC v. North American Boxing Council
49A02-1112-PL-1146
Civil plenary. Reverses and remands trial court grant of partial summary judgment in favor of North American Boxing Council,
finding the grant of summary judgment was erroneous as a matter of law as it pertains to the Indiana Uniform Trade Secrets
Act, and that the Boxing Council’s civil conversion claim doesn’t fall within the criminal law exception to the
IUTSA’s preemption provision.
More
August 9, 2012
7th Circuit Court of Appeals
Danny
R. Richards v. Michael Mitcheff, et al.
11-3227
U.S. District Court, Southern District of Indiana, Indianapolis Division. Judge Sarah Evans Barker.
Civil. Reverses dismissal of Richards’ lawsuit alleging the defendants violated his Eighth Amendment rights by indifference
to his serious medical condition and remands for further proceedings. The suit could not be properly dismissed under Rule
12(b)(6) or Rule 12(c) because Indiana allows the statute of limitations to be tolled while one is incapacitated, which is
what Richards argued as to why he didn’t file his complaint within the applicable time period.
More
August 8, 2012
7th Circuit Court of Appeals
Michael
J. Alexander v. Mark McKinney
11-3539
U.S. District Court, Southern District of Indiana, Indianapolis Division. Chief Judge Richard Young.
Civil. Affirms dismissal of criminal defense attorney Michael Alexander’s lawsuit against Mark McKinney alleging violations
of due process after finding McKinney, former Delaware County prosecutor, was entitled to qualified immunity because the complaint
did not identify a depravation of a cognizable constitutional right. Alexander’s complaint is merely an attempt to recast
an untimely false arrest claim into a due process claim.
More
August 6, 2012
Indiana Court of Appeals
Donald
Gregory Huls v. State of Indiana
64A04-1110-CR-552
Criminal. Affirms convictions of criminal recklessness, one as a Class D felony and one as a Class C felony. Affirms denial
of motion for mistrial because the prosecutor’s isolated comment did not have a probable persuasive effect on the jury
and did not place Huls in grave peril. His proposed jury instructions incorrectly stated the law on self-defense or the evidence
did not support giving them.
More
August 3, 2012
7th Circuit Court of Appeals
BKCAP,
LLC, GRAYCAP, LLC, AND SWCAP, LLC v. Captec Franchise Trust 2000-1
11-2928, 11-3378
U.S. District Court, Northern District of Indiana, South Bend Division. Magistrate Judge Roger B. Cosbey.
Civil. Affirms ruling in favor of the borrowers’ interpretation of the prepayment premium requirements in 12 loans
involving restaurants and award of prejudgment interest to the borrowers. The borrowers’ position was supported by the
evidence presented at trial, and the lender is not entitled to attorney fees.
More
August 2, 2012
Indiana Court of Appeals
N.B.
v. State of Indiana
55A01-1111-JV-574
Juvenile. Affirms determination that N.B. committed the delinquent act of reckless homicide, a Class C felony if committed
by an adult. N.B. contended that the juvenile court abused its discretion in admitting his statement to the investigating
officer at the evidentiary hearing. Finds the procedural safeguards set forth in the juvenile waiver statute were met.
More
July 31, 2012
7th Circuit Court of Appeals
Carol
Aschermann v. Aetna Life Insurance Company, et al.
12-1230
U.S. District Court, Southern District of Indiana, Indianapolis Division. Judge Larry J. McKinney.
Civil. Affirms the District Court judgment in favor of the insurers, in which an insurer stopped paying a worker’s
disability benefits claim, holding that the decision was not arbitrary or capricious.
More
July 30, 2012
7th Circuit Court of Appeals
Winforge,
Inc., et al., v. Coachmen Industries, Inc., et al.
10-3178
U.S. District Court, Southern District of Indiana, Indianapolis Division, Judge Sarah Evans Barker.
Civil. Affirms trial court judgment for defendants, agreeing that the parties had never entered into a final, enforceable
contract.
More
July 27, 2012
7th Circuit Court of Appeals
Leonard
Lapsley, et al. v. Xtek Inc.
11-3313
U.S. District Court, Northern District of Indiana, Hammond Division. Judge Joseph S. Van Bokkelen.
Civil. Affirms denial of Xtek’s Daubert motion that sought to bar Dr. Gary Hutter from offering his expert opinions,
which were essential to Lapsley’s case that a design defect in Xtek’s equipment was the cause of his accident.
In this case, the District Court’s stated analysis of the proposed testimony was brief, but it was also directly to
the point and was sufficient to trigger deferential review on appeal. The District Court did not misapply Daubert.
More
July 26, 2012
Indiana Supreme Court
Michael
J. Lock v. State of Indiana
35S04-1110-CR-622
Criminal. Affirms Lock’s conviction and sentence for Class D felony operating a motor vehicle as a habitual traffic
violator and the revocation of his driving privileges for life. I.C. 9-30-10-16 is not unconstitutionally vague and based
on the stipulation that Lock’s Zuma was traveling 43 MPH, a reasonable fact-finder could find beyond a reasonable doubt
that the Zuma had a maximum design speed in excess of 25 MPH. Justice Rucker dissents.
More
July 25, 2012
Indiana Supreme Court
Kenneth
Dwayne Vaughn v. State of Indiana
45S05-1112-CR-684
Criminal. Affirms decision not to grant a mistrial. Vaughn did not suffer actual harm from the bailiff restraining him by
covering Vaughn’s mouth in front of the jury so he would stop taking.
More
Never heard of remand to another state. How often does that happen?
I highly recommend Deanna and her team of professionals that serve the legal community. Great information and many thanks for sharing.
they are pushing these cases against lawyers too far. thought-crime.
vagueness cannot challenged, so let's write all laws vaguely and throw the constitution out the window.Even if the court is operating under a particular law, if they don't it they will change it to their liking. What a joke!!!
Two convictions becomes one conviction with exactly the same sentence, only it is not clear wheter or not that sentence will be 18 months, 120 months or 138 months. Actually if the guns were in a home, whether or not they were his, he is protected under the 2nd amendment. Jurors need to learn the law and the constitution before judging others. The cour5ts need to do this as well.