June 15, 2012
Indiana Court of Appeals
David
Ashabranner v. Sandy Wilkins, f/k/a Ashabranner
22A01-1109-DR-411
Domestic relations. Affirms in part and remands in part. Affirms the trial court’s denial of emancipation of a child
and remands for recalculation of child support payments, adjusting to include payment from the mother as well as the father.
More
June 13, 2012
7th Circuit Court of Appeals
United States of America v. Cristofer Tichenor
11-2433
U.S. District Court, Southern District of Indiana, Indianapolis Division, Judge Sarah Evans Barker
Criminal. Affirms 300-month sentence following guilty plea to armed robbery and discharging a firearm in connection with
robbing a bank. Rejects Tichenor’s argument that the career offender sentencing guideline is unconstitutionally vague,
finding that the guidelines are not susceptible to vagueness challenges and the U.S. Sentencing Commission did not exceed
its authority by promulgating the “crime of violence” definition.
More
June 12, 2012
7th Circuit Court of Appeals
Svetlana
Arizanovska v. Wal-Mart Stores, Incorporated
11-3387
U.S. District Court, Southern District of Indiana, Indianapolis Division, Chief Judge Richard L. Young.
Civil. Affirms District Court’s finding of summary judgment against Arizanovska on her claims of discrimination, retaliation
and other state-law claims against her employer, Wal-Mart. Holds that Wal-Mart’s suggestion that Arizanovska take an
unpaid leave of absence was outlined in company policy and was not an adverse, retaliatory response to her filing a discrimination
claim.
More
June 11, 2012
7th Circuit Court of Appeals
IP
of A West 86th Street 1, LLC, et al., v. Morgan Stanley Worldwide Capital Holdings, LLC
11-2891
U.S. District Court, Southern District of Indiana, Indianapolis Division, Judge Sarah Evans Barker.
Civil. Affirms District Court’s summary judgment in favor of Morgan Stanley, holding that the company was entitled
to structure the sale of a loan as it wished and that the company did not err in allowing a purchaser to use escrow funds
to finance the sale.
More
June 8, 2012
7th Circuit Court of Appeals
Kenneth
Harper v. C.R. England, Incorporated
11-2975
U. S. District Court, Northern District of Indiana, Hammond Division, Magistrate Judge Paul R. Cherry.
Civil. Affirms District Court’s determination that Harper failed to set forth a prima facie case, under either the
direct or indirect method of proof, to support his claim that C.R. England had retaliated against him for reporting what he
believed to be unlawful racial discrimination. Holds that his record shows excessive absences were the cause for his termination.
More
June 7, 2012
Indiana Court of Appeals
A.R.M.
v. State of Indiana
71A05-1111-JV-613
Juvenile. Affirms juvenile court’s adjudication of A.R.M. as a delinquent child for committing child molesting, as
a Class C felony when committed by an adult, and battery, as a Class B misdemeanor when committed by an adult. Holds that
the court did not err in admitting the child victim’s videotaped testimony.
More
June 6, 2012
Indiana Court of Appeals
Keith
D. Jackson v. State of Indiana
20A03-1105-CR-222
Criminal. Reverses sentence for possession of a firearm by a serious violent felon and remands for resentencing, holding
the trial court erred by imposing a suspended sentence of four years contrary to the accepted plea agreement.
More
June 5, 2012
Indiana Court of Appeals
Kevin
C. O'Connell v. State of Indiana
18A02-1109-CR-889
Criminal. Affirms trial court’s decision to refuse O’Connell’s tendered jury instructions that the word
“voluntary” be included with each of his charges. Holds that other instructions covered the substance of the tendered
instructions.
More
June 1, 2012
7th Circuit Court of Appeals
United
States of America v. Michael Sheneman
11-3161
U.S. District Court, Northern District of Indiana, South Bend Division, Judge Jon E. DeGuilio.
Criminal. Affirms convictions and sentence for four counts of wire fraud in a two-year mortgage fraud scheme. Holds that
Sheneman’s sentence enhancements were justified, due to the sophisticated means used to execute the fraud.
More
May 31, 2012
7th Circuit Court of Appeals
United
States of America v. Aaron M. Davis, Bobby Suggs, et al.
11-1313, 11-1323, et al.
U.S. District Court, Northern District of Indiana, Hammond Division, Judge James T. Moody.
Criminal. In consolidated appeal, affirms denial of the six defendants’ motion to reduce their sentences pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 3582(c)(2) based on the retroactive crack cocaine amendments to the United States Sentencing Guidelines.
The District Court did not have the power to adjudicate Suggs’ motion and lacked subject-matter jurisdiction. There
is sufficient evidence for the District Court to conclude the other defendants were responsible for at least 4.5 kilograms
of crack cocaine, which would prevent their sentences from being reduced.
More
May 30, 2012
Indiana Court of Appeals
Clifton
Ervin v. State of Indiana
29A05-1109-CR-454
Criminal. Affirms grant of a portion of Ervin’s motion to suppress. The trial court properly determined that the evidence
seized by the uniformed on-duty police officers should not be suppressed pursuant to the exclusionary rule. Remands for trial.
More
May 29, 2012
Indiana Court of Appeals
Jason
Tye Myers v. Charles R. Deets III, Deets & Kennedy, and Great American Insurance Group
79A02-1108-CT-771
Civil tort. Affirms summary judgment for Edward Kennedy and the law firm on Myers’ claim for fraud against them and
Deets. Myers couldn’t show that either Kennedy or the law firm was liable for Deets’ alleged fraudulent conduct.
Reverses grant of Great American Insurance Group’s motion for judgment on the pleadings and remands for further proceedings.
Judge Riley concurs in part and dissents in part.
More
May 25, 2012
Indiana Court of Appeals
E.
Paul Haste v. State of Indiana
03A01-1108-CR-369
Criminal. Dismisses Haste’s appeal of his conviction of and sentence for Class B felony dealing in methamphetamine
because the order from which he appeals isn’t a final judgment.
More
May 23, 2012
Indiana Court of Appeals
Gabriel
J. Sharkey v. State of Indiana
84A04-1110-CR-550
Criminal. Affirms sentence following guilty plea to Class D felony intimidation. Sharkey’s 18-month suspended sentence
is appropriate in light of the nature of the crime and his character.
More
May 21, 2012
7th Circuit Court of Appeals
Kristi J. Cortezano v. Salin Bank & Trust Company
United States District Court, Southern District of Indiana, Indianapolis Division, Judge Sarah Evans Barker.
11-1631
Civil. Affirms District court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of Salin Bank & Trust Company, holding the bank
did not violate Cortezano’s rights by firing her due to her husband’s immigration status. Remands to the District
Court to strike from the record the names of Cortezano’s three children, as the District Court had not previously ruled
on that motion.
More
May 18, 2012
Indiana Court of Appeals
In
Re the Adoption of S.J., R.W. v. G.C. and J.C.
04A03-1110-AD-449
Adoption. Dismisses appeal from R.W., the biological father of S.J., holding than an order that states his consent is not
required for the petition to proceed neither grants nor denies S.J.’s adoption and is not a final, appealable action.
More
May 17, 2012
Indiana Court of Appeals
Heriberto
Suarez v. State of Indiana
02A05-1106-PC-325
Post conviction. Affirms denial of petition for post-conviction relief. The court did not err in denying his claim that he
received ineffective assistance of trial counsel.
More
May 14, 2012
Indiana Court of Appeals
Dana
L. Lewis, Jr. v. State of Indiana
40A01-1106-CR-276
Criminal. Reverses denial of Lewis’ motion to suppress statements he made during a police interview regarding an alleged
sex crime. Lewis’ question, “Can I get a lawyer?” constituted an unequivocal invocation of his Fifth Amendment
right to counsel.
More
May 11, 2012
7th Circuit Court of Appeals
BMD
Contractors Inc. v. Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland
11-1345
U.S. District Court, Southern District of Indiana, Indianapolis Division, Judge Tanya Walton Pratt.
Civil. Affirms summary judgment for Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland. The Industrial Power/BMD Contractors subcontract
expressly provides that Industrial Power’s receipt of payment is a condition precedent to its obligation to pay BMD.
Because Industrial Power was never obligated to pay BMD in the first place, BMD may not recover against Fidelity on the payment
bond. Also holds that pay-if-paid clauses are not void under Indiana public policy.
More
May 10, 2012
Indiana Court of Appeals
Allison
Riggle v. State of Indiana
49A05-1109-CR-472
Criminal. Reverses conviction of Class A misdemeanor possession of marijuana. The traffic stop was invalid because Riggle
did not commit a traffic violation. Remands with instructions to vacate her conviction.
More
vagueness cannot challenged, so let's write all laws vaguely and throw the constitution out the window.Even if the court is operating under a particular law, if they don't it they will change it to their liking. What a joke!!!
Two convictions becomes one conviction with exactly the same sentence, only it is not clear wheter or not that sentence will be 18 months, 120 months or 138 months. Actually if the guns were in a home, whether or not they were his, he is protected under the 2nd amendment. Jurors need to learn the law and the constitution before judging others. The cour5ts need to do this as well.
With all due respect, Rick, I think you probably would be making a mistake by going to law school. The job market for attorneys is so saturated, you may well find yourself unemployed and with a lot of debt. You mention law would be a good supplement to your skills. True. But employers unfortunately don't value that. You will find that a law degree may well pigeonhole you into an attorney slot and limit career options. If you have a good job now I would hold onto that. As an attorney, you may well end up making less with the aforementioned debt.
Jack, I was only responding to bill's comment of tying everybody in government together. I agree with you though, it takes one bad apple to ruin the bunch.. As in any profession. What's truly unfair is when somebody violates someone's trust and takes complete advantage of someone
John’s comment is unfair. The majority of attorneys can be trusted. Unfortunately, all it takes is one greedy, unscrupulous, immoral attorney to jade the public.