Oral arguments
On the road, jurists give public access to appellate cases
May 8, 2013
Dave StaffordIt’s no accident that on a college campus in Richmond recently, the Indiana Supreme Court heard a case that involves
allegations of hazing and potential liability for an incident at a Wabash College fraternity.
MoreJustices will visit Lake County for arguments in drug case
May 3, 2013
IL StaffThe Indiana Supreme Court travels to Merrillville High School May 9 for oral arguments dealing with the admittance of drug
evidence after a vehicle search.
MoreJustices focus on hazing, duty in Wabash fraternity case
April 24, 2013
Dave StaffordIndiana Supreme Court justices on Tuesday quizzed attorneys about what constitutes hazing and whether Wabash College and a
fraternity chapter owed a duty to protect a pledge injured when fraternity brothers placed him in a chokehold then dropped
him.
MoreIndiana justices hit the road to hear hazing arguments
April 17, 2013
IL StaffThe Indiana Supreme Court will travel to Indiana University East in Richmond next week to hear arguments in a hazing lawsuit
involving Wabash College.
MoreCritics: Indiana leads from wrong side in same-sex marriage cases
April 10, 2013
Dave StaffordCritics have called out Attorney General Greg Zoeller for taking a lead role in advocating against same-sex marriage. Indiana
wrote or co-wrote amicus briefs signed by other states taking that position in the cases the heard by the Supreme Court of
the United States.
MoreBottling up generics
April 10, 2013
Dave StaffordThe Supreme Court of the United States recently heard a government challenge of drugmakers' "pay to delay" practice.
MoreIndiana solicitor general: ‘Good day’ for traditional marriage at SCOTUS
March 26, 2013
Dave StaffordIndiana and other states against same-sex marriage appeared to make a strong impression on the U.S. Supreme Court justices
Tuesday, Indiana Solicitor General Thomas Fisher said after watching arguments in Washington.
MoreLaptops, tablets now allowed in Indiana Supreme Court
January 28, 2013
Dave StaffordYou now may use a laptop, iPad, and other tablets or computing devices inside oral arguments at the Indiana Supreme Court,
so long as you get permission first, sit in the back row and keep it quiet.
MoreDickson encourages compromise on House Democrat fines suit
January 3, 2013
Dave StaffordIndiana Chief Justice Brent Dickson implored litigants to resolve a lawsuit over the collection of fines levied on House Democrats
who walked out of the Legislature in 2011 and 2012.
MoreJustices decide to allow big exhibit at arguments
January 2, 2013
Dave StaffordThe Indiana Supreme Court has reversed an order it issued Monday that prevented an appellant from bringing in a utility truck
bucket to arguments scheduled Thursday.
MorePublic-record email case focuses on scope of requests
January 2, 2013
Dave StaffordA dustup over access to public records reveals an uncertain standard exists for what is considered a reasonable request to
disclose public officials’ emails under Indiana public record laws.
MorePowers collide in utility rate case charged by ethics scandal
December 19, 2012
Dave StaffordUndue influence is an undercurrent of Duke Energy v. Indiana Utility Regulatory Commission case.
MoreIndiana justices consider constitutional challenge to Choice Scholarship Program
December 5, 2012
Dave StaffordIndiana’s test case for school vouchers could have implications for other states, legal observers said after the state
Supreme Court heard oral arguments in a case that challenges the constitutionality of school vouchers.
MoreState urges justices to draw ‘bright line’ on school choice vouchers
November 21, 2012
Dave StaffordIndiana Solicitor General Thomas Fisher on Wednesday urged the Indiana Supreme Court to uphold the state’s school choice
voucher program, arguing that it did not constitute an unconstitutional government support of religion.
MoreIndiana sex offender parole conditions at issue
November 21, 2012
Dave StaffordIndiana appellate judges are grappling with sensitive questions about whether the state’s automatic and uniform parole
conditions for sex offenders are constitutional.
MoreCOA to hear challenge to sex offender monitoring program
November 12, 2012
IL StaffAn Allen County man’s argument that the state’s Sex Offender Management and Monitoring Program is unconstitutional
will be heard Tuesday by a panel of the Indiana Court of Appeals.
MoreSupreme Court tests HD media hookup
October 25, 2012
Dave StaffordTelevision stations and media organizations on Wednesday tested a new high-definition video system that could become the norm
for coverage of oral arguments before the Indiana Supreme Court.
MoreJustices hear Simon defamation appeal
October 24, 2012
Dave StaffordThe Indiana Supreme Court on Wednesday heard arguments on whether Indianapolis billionaire Herb Simon may proceed with a defamation
suit against a California attorney. The suit involves comments the lawyer made to an Indianapolis TV station regarding allegations
that Simon and his wife employed illegal immigrants at their California home.
More7th Circuit to hold arguments at Notre Dame Law School
September 26, 2012
IL StaffThe 7th Circuit Court of Appeals will hear arguments in three Indiana cases Oct. 1 at Notre Dame Law School, including a lawsuit
filed by African-American police officers and firefighters in Indianapolis who claim the promotion process is racially discriminatory.
MoreSupreme Court sets arguments in school voucher case
September 21, 2012
Jennifer NelsonThe Indiana Supreme Court will hear arguments Nov. 21 over whether the state’s school voucher program is unconstitutional.
MoreSex offender registry listings subject of court appeals
September 12, 2012
Dave StaffordThe 7th Circuit Court of Appeals says DOC must fix errors; The Indiana Court of Appeals recently heard an ex post facto claim.
MoreJustices clarify 'notes on oral arguments' use
May 23, 2012
IL StaffThe Indiana Supreme Court issued an order May 18 informing attorneys that filing of “notes on oral arguments”
without leave of court is no longer part of Indiana’s appellate practice.
MoreJustices grill both sides in IU Health case
May 23, 2012
J.K. WallThe five justices on the Indiana Supreme Court asked feisty questions of both sides in the case in which two Indiana University
Health patients have argued that hospital “chargemaster” rates are unreasonable.
MoreJustices to hear driving while suspended case at Martin University
April 18, 2012
IL StaffThe Indiana Supreme Court will visit Martin University in Indianapolis Friday to hear arguments in a case over whether a man
driving a scooter could be convicted of operating a “motor vehicle” while his driving privileges were suspended.
MoreJustices will hear arguments in Floyd County
March 28, 2012
IL StaffThe Indiana Supreme Court will visit New Albany Thursday to hear arguments in a case involving Rolls-Royce Corp.
More
Sponsored by
on Facebook & Twitter
on Facebook & Twitter
Indiana Lawyer on Facebook
ADVERTISEMENT
-
Indianapolis law firm Stewart & Irwin closing
-
SCOTUS rules against Indiana farmer in seed patent case
-
More than half of Conour’s inventoried assets gone, feds say
-
Social media sleuths find evidence, but admissibility requires authentication
-
Mediation space key to resolution, even if it’s a getaway divorce
Court Calendar
-
May 22, 2013 Floyd Weddle v. State of Indiana - 5/22/13
-
May 24, 2013 Indiana Patient's Compensation Fund v. Judy Holcomb, Personal Representative of the Estate of Mable Louise Cochran, deceased - 5/24/13
-
May 28, 2013 The Estate of Richard A. Mayer and Spangler, Jennings & Dougherty, P.C., v. Lax, Inc., and David Lasco - 5/28/13
-
June 12, 2013 Northern Assurance Company of America v. Thomson, Inc., et al. - 6/12/13
ADVERTISEMENT
Back to TopCopyright © All Rights Reserved. Privacy Policy | Terms of Use.
Design, CMS, Hosting & Web Development :: ePublishing.
Additional Hosting & Delivery by
Jack, I was only responding to bill's comment of tying everybody in government together. I agree with you though, it takes one bad apple to ruin the bunch.. As in any profession. What's truly unfair is when somebody violates someone's trust and takes complete advantage of someone
John’s comment is unfair. The majority of attorneys can be trusted. Unfortunately, all it takes is one greedy, unscrupulous, immoral attorney to jade the public.
In regards to bill's comment about trusting the cover meant. We can trust them about as much as we can trust attorneys'.
This is disturbing to learn...
Yikes!