Orange County
Appeals court overturns suppression of evidence gathered in search
April 19, 2013
Dave StaffordA special judge in Orange Circuit Court erred in suppressing evidence obtained during the execution of a search warrant that
led to a man’s arrest on Class D felony charges of possession of marijuana, the Indiana Court of Appeals ruled Friday.
MoreCourt reverses several theft convictions under single larceny rule
April 4, 2013
Jennifer NelsonAn Orange County man who stole items from a deceased man’s home and sold them had multiple convictions overturned by
the Indiana Court of Appeals, including several theft convictions and failure to report a dead body.
More'Continuing wrong' statute makes malpractice claim timely
December 30, 2011
Jenny MontgomeryA doctor who was the subject of a malpractice claim due to his patient losing consciousness and causing a crash while driving
is not entitled to summary judgment, the Indiana Court of Appeals held.
MoreCook Group board chair to speak at bar foundation dinner
June 17, 2011
Jenny MontgomeryThe Fellows of the Indiana Bar Foundation will host their annual meeting and dinner July 15 in French Lick. New Fellows will
be inducted, the Legendary Lawyer honoree will be announced, and Stephen L. Ferguson will address the audience.
MoreCOA: Tractor sale contract not enforceable
May 19, 2011
Michael HoskinsThe Indiana Court of Appeals says it’s against public policy to uphold any civil contract that’s based on an illegal
action, and so the court says it won’t create a rule allowing that transaction agreement to be enforced.
MoreBird settles French Lick lawsuit
October 8, 2008
IBJ StaffLarry Bird has settled a lawsuit against a bed-and-breakfast that operates from his boyhood home in the southern Indiana town
of French Lick.
MoreSponsored by
on Facebook & Twitter
on Facebook & Twitter
Indiana Lawyer on Facebook
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Back to TopCopyright © All Rights Reserved. Privacy Policy | Terms of Use.
Design, CMS, Hosting & Web Development :: ePublishing.
Additional Hosting & Delivery by
The court of appeals not only tries to rewrite or interpret the law to suit their fancy, now they choose play stupid as well. Every consideration must be given to pro se litigants, who are not held to the same standards as attorneys, as stated by,SCOTUS. I assume they didn't have a lawyer, since one wasn't mentioned and I strongly suggest thatb the rest of the, origional petitioners get back in there and fight for their rights.
the irony of situations like this is that the clients whom conour cheated are the ones who should be pulling hardest for him to remain free and keep his law license, so they have some hopes of him paying back. really bury the guy deep and then there will be little hope of restitution
Qualified immunity, means that if you wear a badge, you are exempt from law and free to do anything you please! The courts will back badge toting individuals, because they think they are above the law as well. They think, they have judicial immunity, they do not.
Deeply, deeply concerned? I'll bet if it was the judge's money that had been swindled we'd see deep concern with actual consequences. First a Ponzi scheme, then a shell game with the assets…c'mon, hasn't Conour abused the judicial system and his clients long enough? I say enough already.
Wow, just wow.