Plainfield
Indiana teams take 5th, 10th place in national civics competition
April 30, 2013
IL StaffTwo Indiana teams ranked among the top 10 after participating in the championship round of the We The People national competition.
More2 Indiana teams competing Monday in the We The People finals
April 29, 2013
IL StaffFor the first time in Indiana history, both of the state’s We The People teams are in the top 10 of the We The People
national finals.
MoreCOA reverses trial court on Kroger building proposal
August 18, 2011
Jenny MontgomeryThe Indiana Court of Appeals has ruled that the Town of Plainfield Plan Commission must provide The Kroger Co. with specific
reasons its building plan was denied or allow Kroger to build a gas station as planned.
MoreNo summary judgment for health-care facility with racial-preference policy
July 20, 2010
Jennifer NelsonThe District Court erred in granting summary judgment to a long-term health-care facility which prevented black workers from
assisting certain residents based on the residents’ requests, the 7th Circuit Court of Appeals ruled today.
MoreCOA upholds Plainfield parks ban
September 24, 2008
Michael HoskinsThe Indiana Constitution doesn't ensure a person's right to enter a public park, and that means a local law restricting
sex offenders from visiting those areas isn't unconstitutional, the Indiana Court of Appeals ruled today.
MoreACLU wins day-old political-sign suit
September 17, 2008
Michael HoskinsWithin a day of filing a federal lawsuit regarding Plainfield's ordinance restricting political campaign signs, the American
Civil Liberties Union of Indiana can claim another win on an issue that's becoming more prominent statewide.
MorePlainfield political sign ordinance challenged
September 16, 2008
Michael HoskinsThe American Civil Liberties Union of Indiana has filed a federal lawsuit challenging a Plainfield ordinance restricting political
lawn signs.
MoreSponsored by
on Facebook & Twitter
on Facebook & Twitter
Indiana Lawyer on Facebook
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Back to TopCopyright © All Rights Reserved. Privacy Policy | Terms of Use.
Design, CMS, Hosting & Web Development :: ePublishing.
Additional Hosting & Delivery by
The court of appeals not only tries to rewrite or interpret the law to suit their fancy, now they choose play stupid as well. Every consideration must be given to pro se litigants, who are not held to the same standards as attorneys, as stated by,SCOTUS. I assume they didn't have a lawyer, since one wasn't mentioned and I strongly suggest thatb the rest of the, origional petitioners get back in there and fight for their rights.
the irony of situations like this is that the clients whom conour cheated are the ones who should be pulling hardest for him to remain free and keep his law license, so they have some hopes of him paying back. really bury the guy deep and then there will be little hope of restitution
Qualified immunity, means that if you wear a badge, you are exempt from law and free to do anything you please! The courts will back badge toting individuals, because they think they are above the law as well. They think, they have judicial immunity, they do not.
Deeply, deeply concerned? I'll bet if it was the judge's money that had been swindled we'd see deep concern with actual consequences. First a Ponzi scheme, then a shell game with the assets…c'mon, hasn't Conour abused the judicial system and his clients long enough? I say enough already.
Wow, just wow.