February 27, 2013
Dave StaffordA recent bankruptcy appeal tossing an Indianapolis shopping center’s reorganization plan further establishes that the
control of equity in Chapter 11 cases will be subject to competitive bidding and that insiders might be out of luck.
More
February 27, 2013
Marilyn OdendahlThe Indiana General Assembly moving forward with expungement bill.
More
February 27, 2013
Scott OlsonAlan Levin has been managing partner of Barnes & Thornburg LLP for 16 years, far longer than the heads of most major Indianapolis
law firms. But what most sets him apart is that he’s built his firm into a national practice by taking the maverick
approach of going it alone instead of merging with an out-of-state rival.
More
February 27, 2013
Jennifer Lukemeyer, Fred VaianaWe give Pure Eatery 3.5 gavels!
More
February 27, 2013
Robert HammerleBob Hammerle reviews two movies who recently won awards at the 2013 Oscars.
More
January 30, 2013
Dave StaffordDennis Stolle is a partner at Barnes & Thornburg LLP, but his skills as a doctor of social psychology are more important
in his niche as a jury consultant.
More
January 30, 2013
Dave StaffordIndiana Chief Justice Brent Dickson’s first State of the Judiciary address after 27 years on the bench produced a few
collegial chuckles as he offered examples of checks and balances and noted lawmakers had rewritten laws in response to at
least three Supreme Court opinions in the last year.
More
January 30, 2013
Marilyn OdendahlStanding between two judges offering different opinions on how to proceed is not a place many attorneys would want to be.
However, a group of students at Adams High School in South Bend often found themselves with opposing pieces of advice from
the jurists. Two sets of instructions, two judges and no chance for a recess.
More
January 30, 2013
Dave StaffordMichael Jasaitis gives his family effusive praise for instilling the values that propelled him to the presidency of the Lake
County Bar Association. But competitive collegiate Nintendo also might have helped.
More
January 30, 2013
Marilyn OdendahlSince hospitals are seeing cuts in Medicare, they're asking the Indiana Legislature to enlarge the Medicaid program.
More
January 30, 2013
Dave StaffordMartin Jonassen describes himself as a sovereign citizen, one of a loose affiliation of people who believe most laws don’t
apply to them. Adherents also strive to make life difficult and sometimes dangerous for law enforcement and the judiciary,
and Indiana lawmakers have taken notice.
More
January 30, 2013
Marilyn OdendahlIn the fight over corporate influence in politics, one group is hoping the voice of the people can trump the allure of money.
More
January 30, 2013
Kelly LucasWe're excited about bringing readers another opportunity to learn about and maintain connections with lawyers around the state.
More
January 30, 2013
David DreyerJudge David Dreyer writes a letter to Gov. Mike Pence about how to make people more legally literate.
More
January 16, 2013
Dave StaffordFederal courts that have squeezed staff as budgets shrank could be forced to furlough employees if Congress fails to avoid
mandatory budget cuts that now are slated to take effect in March.
More
January 16, 2013
Marilyn OdendahlAlthough changing the Indiana Constitution is not easy, attempts to amend are common and the 2013 session of the Indiana General
Assembly could see two proposed amendments come to the floor for a second vote. One amendment would protect Hoosiers’
right to hunt while the other would restrict their right to marry.
More
January 16, 2013
Marilyn OdendahlIndiana University Robert H. McKinney School of Law professor Joel Schumm never forgets his mother telling him that life is
not fair. Still he wants to make it a little fairer.
More
January 16, 2013
Marilyn OdendahlAn increased focus on school safety is expected in Indiana Legislature this session.
More
January 16, 2013
Dave StaffordAfter seven years, there still has been no discovery on $16 million in casino revenue funneled to East Chicago Second Century.
More
January 16, 2013
Chris O'MalleyA trademark-infringement case brought against App Press LLC threatens to smother the tech startup in legal fees before it
reaches its potential. And in a curious twist, the case also has generated grumblings in the tightknit developer community
toward a big law firm that is representing App Press’ opponent in the federal court case.
More
January 16, 2013
Mobile payments are becoming popular, but consumers must proactively protect against fraud.
More
January 16, 2013
Steven BadgerIn the first part of this column, I outlined the advantages and disadvantages of arbitration as an alternative to litigation
in court and concluded that neither arbitration nor litigation is preferable in all situations. This second part provides
more specific suggestions on when to use arbitration in certain high-risk, “bet-the-company” situations.
More
January 16, 2013
John MaleyThe Southern District has amended several Local Rules. These were approved in late December and took effect Jan. 1.
More
January 2, 2013
Kelly LucasAs I write the first of my 2013 columns, my inclination is to put on my rose-colored glasses and look with optimism toward
the year ahead. While I feel that I am truly a glass-half-full kind of gal, I am also a realist and not a fan of people who
stick their heads in the sand and pretend things are OK when they are not.
More
January 2, 2013
Steven BadgerIn my world of dispute resolution, one of the most basic questions is whether a particular business dispute should be resolved
in arbitration or in a court of law. Like many of the questions I am frequently asked by clients, there is no simple answer
that fits all occasions and situations.
More
Never heard of remand to another state. How often does that happen?
I highly recommend Deanna and her team of professionals that serve the legal community. Great information and many thanks for sharing.
they are pushing these cases against lawyers too far. thought-crime.
vagueness cannot challenged, so let's write all laws vaguely and throw the constitution out the window.Even if the court is operating under a particular law, if they don't it they will change it to their liking. What a joke!!!
Two convictions becomes one conviction with exactly the same sentence, only it is not clear wheter or not that sentence will be 18 months, 120 months or 138 months. Actually if the guns were in a home, whether or not they were his, he is protected under the 2nd amendment. Jurors need to learn the law and the constitution before judging others. The cour5ts need to do this as well.