Pro Bono District 8
Free CLE offered for pro bono volunteers
December 7, 2010
Rebecca BerfangerBar associations and pro bono districts are working together to encourage attorneys to sign up to participate in the annual
statewide Talk to a Lawyer Today event taking place Jan. 17, 2011. Free CLE, which is offered in December and January to lawyers
who volunteer their time with TTALT but is not required to participate in the event, is a video replay of a CLE that originally
took place in Indianapolis in October.
MoreMarion Superior judge new pro bono committee chair
July 30, 2010
IL StaffThe District 8 Pro Bono Committee has a new chair – Marion Superior Judge David A Shaheed.
MorePredicting IOLTA fund revenues
May 26, 2010
Rebecca BerfangerAll that is known about funding for Indiana’s 14 pro bono districts is that no one yet knows exactly how much the districts
will receive in October for their 2011 budgets.
MoreAnnual Talk to a Lawyer event a success
January 19, 2010
Rebecca BerfangerWhile the official numbers are not yet available from Monday's statewide Talk to a Lawyer Today event that annually
takes place on the Martin Luther King Jr. Day, all 14 pro bono districts participated.
MoreSponsored by
on Facebook & Twitter
on Facebook & Twitter
Indiana Lawyer on Facebook
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Back to TopCopyright © All Rights Reserved. Privacy Policy | Terms of Use.
Design, CMS, Hosting & Web Development :: ePublishing.
Additional Hosting & Delivery by
Qualified immunity, means that if you wear a badge, you are exempt from law and free to do anything you please! The courts will back badge toting individuals, because they think they are above the law as well. They think, they have judicial immunity, they do not.
Deeply, deeply concerned? I'll bet if it was the judge's money that had been swindled we'd see deep concern with actual consequences. First a Ponzi scheme, then a shell game with the assets…c'mon, hasn't Conour abused the judicial system and his clients long enough? I say enough already.
Wow, just wow.
Forcing a defendant to wear a stun belt, in court or otherwise, is a violation of american principles! It is also unconstitutional!
So, if I save $100.00 cash per week, from my $500.00 per week paycheck, for 50 years, at which time, I will have saved $260,000.00, the government can raid my home and take my money, just by saying it is drug money! Shouldn't the government, have some kind of evidence of drugs, rather, than just saying we are the government and we will take anything you own, anytime we choose? Tyranny is upon us! If you don't know your rights, you don't have any!