April 24, 2013
Jennifer NelsonThe Indiana Court of Appeals upheld the suppression of evidence in a man’s drunken-driving case, finding police did
not have reasonable suspicion to pull the man over because he was driving left of center on a county road to avoid poor road
conditions.
More
February 13, 2013
Jennifer NelsonIn a matter of first impression in the 7th Circuit Court of Appeals and federal courts, the judges were asked to consider
whether a discrepancy between the observed color of a car and the color listed on its registration alone gives rise to reasonable
suspicion of criminal activity.
More
March 14, 2012
IL StaffRetired Putnam Superior Judge Sally Hallof Gray passed away Tuesday. She was 78.
More
October 6, 2011
Jennifer NelsonA county sheriff’s department that doesn’t own, maintain or control a county road does not owe a common law duty
to warn the public of known hazardous conditions upon the roadway, the Indiana Supreme Court ruled Thursday.
More
February 7, 2011
IL StaffThe Indiana Supreme Court will hold oral arguments in a case alleging negligence against the Putnam County sheriff Tuesday
at Indiana University School of Law - Indianapolis.
More
December 13, 2010
IL StaffThe Indiana Supreme Court has accepted two cases, one involving how public safety officials notify the driving public about
icy road conditions and a second case delving into what state law requires when it comes to property tax changing land annexations.
More
March 12, 2009
Jennifer NelsonIn a disciplinary action released Wednesday by the Indiana Supreme Court, the justices disagreed as to whether two public
defenders who worked part time in the same public defender office of Putnam County were "associated in a firm."
More
Never heard of remand to another state. How often does that happen?
I highly recommend Deanna and her team of professionals that serve the legal community. Great information and many thanks for sharing.
they are pushing these cases against lawyers too far. thought-crime.
vagueness cannot challenged, so let's write all laws vaguely and throw the constitution out the window.Even if the court is operating under a particular law, if they don't it they will change it to their liking. What a joke!!!
Two convictions becomes one conviction with exactly the same sentence, only it is not clear wheter or not that sentence will be 18 months, 120 months or 138 months. Actually if the guns were in a home, whether or not they were his, he is protected under the 2nd amendment. Jurors need to learn the law and the constitution before judging others. The cour5ts need to do this as well.