Solo and small firm
Military-leave suit targets law firm
March 17, 2009
Michael HoskinsThe U.S. Department of Justice says an Indianapolis law firm wrongfully refused to re-employ a staff attorney who'd returned
from serving in Iraq as a member of the Indiana Army National Guard.
MoreAttorneys leaving Bingham to form new firm
February 11, 2009
Michael HoskinsSeven attorneys are leaving Indianapolis firm Bingham McHale to form a new insurance litigation firm, a move that one of the
departing partners said came as a result of high rates and the large firm's practice group effectively pricing itself
out of the market.
MoreProminent Seymour attorney dies
January 29, 2009
IL StaffA Seymour attorney recognized for his contributions to the community died unexpectedly Jan. 27 during a morning workout.
MoreMuncie lawyer named city court judge
December 22, 2008
Michael HoskinsA Muncie law firm will remain intact after both of its longtime partners take the bench in January.
MoreAttorney faces charges of mail, wire fraud
October 22, 2008
Jennifer NelsonA federal grand jury in Hammond has indicted a Schererville attorney with two counts of wire fraud and one count of mail fraud
after being accused of stealing money from two clients.
MoreSettlement may be largest of its kind
October 14, 2008
Michael HoskinsIn what is believed to be the highest-ever payout of its kind in the state, the Indiana Department of Insurance will
receive $16.5 million from a national legal malpractice insurer as part of a federal lawsuit settlement.
MoreState settles with legal malpractice insurer
October 13, 2008
Michael HoskinsA legal malpractice insurance carrier has agreed to pay $16.5 million to Indiana's insurance department, settling a federal
lawsuit that had come on the heels of a state malpractice claim where an Indianapolis law firm got hit with an $18 million
verdict.
More
Sponsored by
on Facebook & Twitter
on Facebook & Twitter
Indiana Lawyer on Facebook
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Back to TopCopyright © All Rights Reserved. Privacy Policy | Terms of Use.
Design, CMS, Hosting & Web Development :: ePublishing.
Additional Hosting & Delivery by
The court of appeals not only tries to rewrite or interpret the law to suit their fancy, now they choose play stupid as well. Every consideration must be given to pro se litigants, who are not held to the same standards as attorneys, as stated by,SCOTUS. I assume they didn't have a lawyer, since one wasn't mentioned and I strongly suggest thatb the rest of the, origional petitioners get back in there and fight for their rights.
the irony of situations like this is that the clients whom conour cheated are the ones who should be pulling hardest for him to remain free and keep his law license, so they have some hopes of him paying back. really bury the guy deep and then there will be little hope of restitution
Qualified immunity, means that if you wear a badge, you are exempt from law and free to do anything you please! The courts will back badge toting individuals, because they think they are above the law as well. They think, they have judicial immunity, they do not.
Deeply, deeply concerned? I'll bet if it was the judge's money that had been swindled we'd see deep concern with actual consequences. First a Ponzi scheme, then a shell game with the assets…c'mon, hasn't Conour abused the judicial system and his clients long enough? I say enough already.
Wow, just wow.