South Bend
Lenders meet with borrowers at event
September 29, 2010
Rebecca BerfangerFollowing a statewide event Sept. 1 to help to homeowners who were concerned they might be facing foreclosures, the Indiana
Foreclosure Prevention Network hosted another event Sept. 16 in Indianapolis.
MoreJustices rule on judicial mandate case
June 22, 2010
Michael HoskinsIn its first case since the state amended its rules last year on how judicial mandates are handled, the Indiana Supreme Court
has today issued a decision about a St. Joseph Superior judge’s mandate for the county to pay for multiple items he
considered necessary for running the local juvenile justice system.
MoreCircuit court upholds Section 8 precedent
May 10, 2010
Jennifer NelsonThe 7th Circuit Court of Appeals declined today to overturn precedent on the due process rights of someone rejected from specific
Section 8 housing.
More7th Circuit affirms writ of habeas corpus
January 27, 2010
Jennifer NelsonOn remand from the Supreme Court of the United States, the 7th Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the District Court's conditional
grant of the petition for a writ of habeas corpus for a man facing the death penalty.
MoreState of Judiciary to air on PBS
January 22, 2010
IL StaffFor those who weren't able to catch Chief Justice Randall T. Shepard's State of the Judiciary in person or want to
see it again, Indiana Public Broadcasting Stations around the state will air the speech next week.
MoreAppellate court splits on liability of city
December 15, 2009
Jennifer NelsonThe Indiana Court of Appeals split today in deciding whether the city of South Bend should have known putting heavy machinery
on an unstable sidewalk would create an unreasonable risk of harm to a brick restorer.
MoreCOA travels north to hear arguments
October 5, 2009
IL StaffThe Indiana Court of Appeals travels to Marion and South Bend this week to hear arguments in an appeal of voluntary manslaughter
and criminal recklessness convictions, and a case involving a conviction of child solicitation.
MoreCOA: University should get summary judgment
July 30, 2009
Jennifer NelsonThe Indiana Court of Appeals ruled in favor of the trustees of Indiana University, finding the trial court erred when it denied
summary judgment for the school and concluded a provision in an agreement between the school and a fired professor was ambiguous.
MorePhone-a-thon helps 2,000 homeowners
July 2, 2009
Rebecca BerfangerA phone-a-thon June 30 helped 2,000 Indiana homeowners by giving them a chance to get more information if they were afraid
of facing foreclosure or already knew their home was or would likely go into foreclosure.
MoreSenate gets St. Joe judges bill, with twist
April 8, 2009
Michael HoskinsThe full Indiana Senate will consider in the next week whether St. Joseph Superior judges should be elected or merit-selected
and retained by voters. A Senate committee wants the full legislative body to consider that issue, but with a twist: An amendment
has been attached to the controversial House Bill 1491.
MoreJustices: City can proceed with ELA claim
January 23, 2009
Jennifer NelsonThe Indiana Supreme Court held that the city of South Bend's claim under the Environmental Legal Action statute can continue
because the statute of limitations hadn't run out.
More
Sponsored by
on Facebook & Twitter
on Facebook & Twitter
Indiana Lawyer on Facebook
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Back to TopCopyright © All Rights Reserved. Privacy Policy | Terms of Use.
Design, CMS, Hosting & Web Development :: ePublishing.
Additional Hosting & Delivery by
Qualified immunity, means that if you wear a badge, you are exempt from law and free to do anything you please! The courts will back badge toting individuals, because they think they are above the law as well. They think, they have judicial immunity, they do not.
Deeply, deeply concerned? I'll bet if it was the judge's money that had been swindled we'd see deep concern with actual consequences. First a Ponzi scheme, then a shell game with the assets…c'mon, hasn't Conour abused the judicial system and his clients long enough? I say enough already.
Wow, just wow.
Forcing a defendant to wear a stun belt, in court or otherwise, is a violation of american principles! It is also unconstitutional!
So, if I save $100.00 cash per week, from my $500.00 per week paycheck, for 50 years, at which time, I will have saved $260,000.00, the government can raid my home and take my money, just by saying it is drug money! Shouldn't the government, have some kind of evidence of drugs, rather, than just saying we are the government and we will take anything you own, anytime we choose? Tyranny is upon us! If you don't know your rights, you don't have any!