Sports Law/Entertainment law

New concussions deal with NCAA proposed

April 15, 2015
 Associated Press
Filings in U.S. District Court in Chicago late Tuesday night notified a federal judge that there was a new proposed settlement for a head injury lawsuit against the NCAA brought by football players and other college athletes.
More

NCAA appeal says students will lose if amateur sports rules tossed

March 18, 2015
 Bloomberg News
Professional sports and higher education are a losing combination for American college students and fans. That was the National Collegiate Athletic Association’s game-day argument as it seeks to reverse a judge’s ruling that the organization behind March Madness and January bowl games is running a multibillion-dollar cartel that cheats athletes.
More

Judge's order adds Griffith, Hammond back into state tourney

March 3, 2015
 Associated Press
Two high school basketball teams kicked out of Indiana's state basketball tournament after a bench-clearing brawl have been allowed back in that tournament by a Lake County judge.
More

Judge questions $75M NCAA concussion settlement

October 23, 2014
 Associated Press
A federal judge overseeing a first-of-its-kind head injury settlement with the NCAA expressed concerns Thursday about some terms and the scope of the $75 million deal that encompasses all athletes going back decades.
More

Little-known Indiana baseball roots rediscovered in lawyer’s exhibit

September 24, 2014
Dave Stafford
Baseball once was Indiana’s game, and attorney Scott Tarter has a major-league passion about preserving its rightful, if obscure, place in history.
More

NCAA asks for dismissal of 2 scholarship lawsuits

September 5, 2014
 Associated Press
The NCAA and 11 conferences that have played major college football in recent years have filed a motion to dismiss two antitrust lawsuits that accuse the association of illegally capping compensation to athletes.
More

Purdue balks at use of its brand in panned film

August 25, 2014
 Associated Press
Purdue University officials are asking their legal counsel to look into a new movie that makes frequent references to the school despite its refusal to grant permission to use official trademarks and logos.
More

NCAA files intent to appeal O'Bannon decision

August 22, 2014
 Associated Press
The NCAA has notified the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals that it intends to appeal a judge's ruling in the Ed O'Bannon case that it violated antitrust laws.
More

NCAA's strongest argument might be cap limit

August 19, 2014
 Associated Press
The NCAA's best argument against the Ed O'Bannon ruling may be the financial limits imposed by U.S. District Judge Claudia Wilken — the same ones the NCAA lauded in her decision.
More

Emmert says NCAA will appeal O'Bannon ruling

August 11, 2014
 Associated Press
NCAA President Mark Emmert said Sunday that the NCAA will appeal a ruling that opens the door for college athletes to receive some of the money they help generate in major sports.
More

Federal judge keeps alive Rock case vs. NCAA

May 29, 2013
Dave Stafford
A federal judge has left the door open for a former Division I college football quarterback to pursue his claim that the NCAA constitutes an illegal college sports monopoly, allowing him to amend a complaint that had been dismissed.
More

Lawsuit threatens NCAA's amateur business model

May 22, 2013
Anthony Schoettle
The NCAA is facing a potential game-changing legal battle that has some colleges worrying their athletic budgets could be halved.
More

NCAA's point man

November 21, 2012
Dave Stafford
The NCAA faces an array of litigation from current and former players, much of which posits antitrust allegations.
More

Indiana lawyer key player in anti-doping case

November 7, 2012
Anthony Schoettle
Bill Bock worked for more than 2 years to uncover evidence against Lance Armstrong.
More

Roberts ready for last year at bat

August 29, 2012
Marilyn Odendahl
Indiana University Robert H. McKinney's dean talks legal education and his future teaching plans.
More

New suit alleges NCAA monopoly, seeks class action

July 27, 2012
Dave Stafford
A new federal lawsuit has been filed alleging that the Indianapolis-based NCAA constitutes an illegal college sports monopoly.
More

IU McKinney dean named to Court of Arbitration for Sport

April 6, 2012
IL Staff
Indiana University Robert H. McKinney School of Law Dean Gary R. Roberts has been appointed to the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS). CAS is independent of any sports organization and provides services to facilitate the settlement of sports-related disputes through arbitration or mediation by means of procedural rules adapted to specific sports.
More

7th Circuit reverses in girls' basketball discrimination complaint

February 1, 2012
Jenny Montgomery
The 7th Circuit Court of Appeals issued an opinion Tuesday stating it believes the appellants in a discrimination claim have presented a genuine question of fact that merits further review.
More

Behind the scenes of the Super Bowl

January 4, 2012
Michael Hoskins
Attorneys help plan for the big event in February 2012 in Indianapolis.
More

Guidelines aim to raise concussion awareness

January 4, 2012
Jenny Montgomery
New laws and policies are prompted by the long-term effects of head injuries in sports.
More

Corporate counsel is running strong

December 7, 2011
Michael Hoskins
Indianapolis attorney Norm Wain creates a new national Association of Corporate Counsel committee on sports and entertainment law.
More

Lawsuit filed against former coach, swim organizations

November 10, 2011
Jennifer Nelson
A victim molested by the former swim coach at an Indianapolis high school and club team is suing the former coach, the school corporation and two swimming organizations, arguing several people knew of the coach’s past inappropriate contact with minors and did nothing about it.
More

Brief filed in NCAA scholarship appeal

October 28, 2011
Michael Hoskins
Two former college athletes who lost their scholarships because of injuries are now arguing to the 7th Circuit Court of Appeals that they would have received multi-year athletic scholarships covering the costs of their bachelor’s degrees if it wasn’t for the “anti-competitive” National Collegiate Athletic Association Division I bylaws.
More

Keeping baseball legal

June 8, 2011
Michael Hoskins
An Indianapolis sports law attorney who represented a prosecution witness at the start of the baseball steroid case against Barry Bonds recently saw the final “at bat” for the prosecution and defense in a California courtroom.
More

Sports fan-turned-attorney finds dream job at NCAA

May 11, 2011
Jenny Montgomery
Naima Stevenson’s love for sports began about the time she realized that sports fans in her household got to watch the big TV.
More
Page  1 2 >> pager
Sponsored by
2015 Distinguished Barrister &
Up and Coming Lawyer Reception

Tuesday, May 5, 2015 • 4:30 - 7:00 pm
Learn More


ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. The $320,000 is the amount the school spent in litigating two lawsuits: One to release the report involving John Trimble (as noted in the story above) and one defending the discrimination lawsuit. The story above does not mention the amount spent to defend the discrimination suit, that's why the numbers don't match. Thanks for reading.

  2. $160k? Yesterday the figure was $320k. Which is it Indiana Lawyer. And even more interesting, which well connected law firm got the (I am guessing) $320k, six time was the fired chancellor received. LOL. (From yesterday's story, which I guess we were expected to forget overnight ... "According to records obtained by the Journal & Courier, Purdue spent $161,812, beginning in July 2012, in a state open records lawsuit and $168,312, beginning in April 2013, for defense in a federal lawsuit. Much of those fees were spent battling court orders to release an independent investigation by attorney John Trimble that found Purdue could have handled the forced retirement better")

  3. The numbers are harsh; 66 - 24 in the House, 40 - 10 in the Senate. And it is an idea pushed by the Democrats. Dead end? Ummm not necessarily. Just need to go big rather than go home. Nuclear option. Give it to the federal courts, the federal courts will ram this down our throats. Like that other invented right of the modern age, feticide. Rights too precious to be held up by 2000 years of civilization hang in the balance. Onward!

  4. I'm currently seeing someone who has a charge of child pornography possession, he didn't know he had it because it was attached to a music video file he downloaded when he was 19/20 yrs old and fought it for years until he couldn't handle it and plead guilty of possession. He's been convicted in Illinois and now lives in Indiana. Wouldn't it be better to give them a chance to prove to the community and their families that they pose no threat? He's so young and now because he was being a kid and downloaded music at a younger age, he has to pay for it the rest of his life? It's unfair, he can't live a normal life, and has to live in fear of what people can say and do to him because of something that happened 10 years ago? No one deserves that, and no one deserves to be labeled for one mistake, he got labeled even though there was no intent to obtain and use the said content. It makes me so sad to see someone I love go through this and it makes me holds me back a lot because I don't know how people around me will accept him...second chances should be given to those under the age of 21 at least so they can be given a chance to live a normal life as a productive member of society.

  5. It's just an ill considered remark. The Sup Ct is inherently political, as it is a core part of government, and Marbury V Madison guaranteed that it would become ever more so Supremely thus. So her remark is meaningless and she just should have not made it.... what she could have said is that Congress is a bunch of lazys and cowards who wont do their jobs so the hard work of making laws clear, oftentimes stops with the Sups sorting things out that could have been resolved by more competent legislation. That would have been a more worthwhile remark and maybe would have had some relevance to what voters do, since voters cant affect who gets appointed to the supremely un-democratic art III courts.

ADVERTISEMENT