Trial Report

COA affirms father in contempt for not paying education expenses

June 24, 2015
Jennifer Nelson
The Indiana Court of Appeals affirmed the finding of a trial court that a daughter did not repudiate her father following a fall out over a car, so her father was required to continue paying her post-secondary educational expenses.
More

Inmate not entitled to revised sentence under amended statute

June 24, 2015
Jennifer Nelson
Although the recently amended sentence-modification statute now applies to an inmate seeking to revise his sentence, the Indiana Court of Appeals affirmed the denial of Ivan Vazquez’s petition due to untimely filing.
More

Breach of employment contract/intentional tort

March 25, 2015
Bradley Scott Montgomery v. Danville Community School Corporation
More

Uninsured motorist action

February 25, 2015
A submitted trial report on Barden v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Insurance Co.
More

Driver crossing backed-up street involved in accident

January 28, 2015
Case information on an Indianapolis accident with injury.
More

Motorcycle Accident

July 17, 2013
Garrett Minniear v. Chase King d/b/a King Masonry LLC
More

Medical malpractice

July 18, 2012
Resa v. Greathouse-Williams, et al.
More

Trucking accident

July 6, 2011
Willetter Morrison-Johnson and Steven Johnson v. Republic Services of Indiana, L.P. and Jason Stanley
More

Automobile accident involving police officer

May 25, 2011
Rolla Trent v. City of Peru
More

Automobile accident

April 26, 2011
Melissa Miller v. Crossroads Rehabilitation Center, Inc. and John Gocke
More

Vehicle negligence

March 2, 2011
Patricia Mowery and Harold Mowery Jr. v. Arron Hofmeister and Marathon Petroleum Company LP
More

Wrongful Death

December 22, 2010
Estate of Morris v. Sampson
More

Wrongful death

October 13, 2010
Schroeder v. Todd’s Companion Plus
More

Civil battery

October 13, 2010
Thomas v. Office of State Chemist
More

Automobile-bicycle collision

October 13, 2010
Donald E. Brier v. Irene Wegner
More

Eminent domain

September 1, 2010
State of Indiana v. Ecoff Trucking Inc.
More

Products Liability/Negligence

July 19, 2010
Jonathan M. Hinsey v.  Better Built Dry Kilns, Inc. and DeNardi, s.r.l., a/k/a Nardi Group and Nardi Partecipazioni, s.r.l.
More

Medical malpractice

June 23, 2010
Jason Cole Sr., as Personal Representative of the Estates of Patricia Harris Cole and Baby Jason Cole Jr. v. Joseph M. Smith, M.D.
More

Personal injury

May 26, 2010
Donna Saine v. Richard Walker, et al.
More

Uninsured motorist coverage claim

May 26, 2010
Michael Dec Jr. and Pamela M. Dec v. Encompass Insurance
More

Dog bite to child

April 28, 2010
Steven and Jessica Russell, as parent of Caroline Russell, a minor v. Charles and Sherry Baughman
More

Wrongful death

March 17, 2010
Jennifer Murphy, as parent of Travis Tyler Hensley, deceased v. DB Mobile Home Park
More

Negligence during fingerprinting

December 23, 2009
Grande v. Marion County Sheriff
More

Breach of contract

October 28, 2009
Aviation Professionals Institute, LLC v. Gary/ Chicago International Airport Authority
More
Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. No second amendment, pro life, pro traditional marriage, reagan or trump tshirts will be sold either. And you cannot draw Mohammed even in your own notebook. And you must wear a helmet at all times while at the fair. And no lawyer jokes can be told except in the designated protest area. And next year no crucifixes, since they are uber offensive to all but Catholics. Have a nice bland day here in the Lego movie. Remember ... Everything is awesome comrades.

  2. Thank you for this post . I just bought a LG External DVD It came with Cyber pwr 2 go . It would not play on Lenovo Idea pad w/8.1 . Your recommended free VLC worked great .

  3. All these sites putting up all the crap they do making Brent Look like A Monster like he's not a good person . First off th fight actually started not because of Brent but because of one of his friends then when the fight popped off his friend ran like a coward which left Brent to fend for himself .It IS NOT a crime to defend yourself 3 of them and 1 of him . just so happened he was a better fighter. I'm Brent s wife so I know him personally and up close . He's a very caring kind loving man . He's not abusive in any way . He is a loving father and really shouldn't be where he is not for self defense . Now because of one of his stupid friends trying to show off and turning out to be nothing but a coward and leaving Brent to be jumped by 3 men not only is Brent suffering but Me his wife , his kids abd step kidshis mom and brother his family is left to live without him abd suffering in more ways then one . that man was and still is my smile ....he's the one real thing I've ever had in my life .....f@#@ You Lafayette court system . Learn to do your jobs right he maybe should have gotten that year for misdemeanor battery but that s it . not one person can stand to me and tell me if u we're in a fight facing 3 men and u just by yourself u wouldn't fight back that you wouldn't do everything u could to walk away to ur family ur kids That's what Brent is guilty of trying to defend himself against 3 men he wanted to go home tohisfamily worse then they did he just happened to be a better fighter and he got the best of th others . what would you do ? Stand there lay there and be stomped and beaten or would u give it everything u got and fight back ? I'd of done the same only I'm so smallid of probably shot or stabbed or picked up something to use as a weapon . if it was me or them I'd do everything I could to make sure I was going to live that I would make it hone to see my kids and husband . I Love You Brent Anthony Forever & Always .....Soul 1 baby

  4. Good points, although this man did have a dog in the legal fight as that it was his mother on trial ... and he a dependent. As for parking spaces, handicap spots for pregnant women sure makes sense to me ... er, I mean pregnant men or women. (Please, I meant to include pregnant men the first time, not Room 101 again, please not Room 101 again. I love BB)

  5. I have no doubt that the ADA and related laws provide that many disabilities must be addressed. The question, however, is "by whom?" Many people get dealt bad cards by life. Some are deaf. Some are blind. Some are crippled. Why is it the business of the state to "collectivize" these problems and to force those who are NOT so afflicted to pay for those who are? The fact that this litigant was a mere spectator and not a party is chilling. What happens when somebody who speaks only East Bazurkistanish wants a translator so that he can "understand" the proceedings in a case in which he has NO interest? Do I and all other taxpayers have to cough up? It would seem so. ADA should be amended to provide a simple rule: "Your handicap, YOUR problem". This would apply particularly to handicapped parking spaces, where it seems that if the "handicap" is an ingrown toenail, the government comes rushing in to assist the poor downtrodden victim. I would grant wounded vets (IED victims come to mind in particular) a pass on this.. but others? Nope.

ADVERTISEMENT