U.S. Supreme Court certiorari
SCOTUS declines church property dispute case
April 29, 2013
Jennifer NelsonThe Supreme Court of the United States will not take a case involving a dispute between churches over property.
MoreSCOTUS declines review of injunction against Medicaid cap on dental work
April 22, 2013
IL StaffThe Supreme Court of the United States will leave undisturbed a ruling that blocked state efforts to cap dental work for Medicaid
recipients at $1,000 per year.
MoreIndiana authors SCOTUS brief on legislative prayer
January 9, 2013
IL StaffIndiana Solicitor General Thomas M. Fisher drafted an amicus brief filed in the Supreme Court of the United States Monday
in Town of Greece, N.Y. v. Galloway, 12-696. The brief, joined by 17 other states, asks the nation’s highest
court to grant cert petition and issue a ruling clarifying that prayer is permitted before legislative bodies without requiring
leaders to screen prayers for sectarian references.
MoreSCOTUS to hear Indiana farmer’s case against Monsanto in February
January 7, 2013
Marilyn OdendahlA patent infringement case involving a Knox County soybean farmer and an international seed producer will be argued Feb. 19
before the Supreme Court of the United States.
MoreJustices hear arguments in Ball State case
November 26, 2012
Jennifer NelsonIn a case that hinges on the definition of “supervisor,” the United States Supreme Court heard arguments Monday
morning in a lawsuit filed by a Ball State University employee.
MoreIndiana farmer’s tangle with seed producer over patent infringement gets SCOTUS review
October 8, 2012
Marilyn OdendahlThe Supreme Court of the United States has agreed to review a federal appeals court decision regarding patent infringement
in a case involving an Indiana farmer and a seed producer.
MoreSCOTUS declines Indiana robo-call case
October 2, 2012
Jennifer NelsonThe Supreme Court of the United States came back for its 2012 session Monday and decided it will not take the appeal filed
by a provider of prerecorded telephonic messages seeking to overturn enforcement of a ban on automated robo-calls in Indiana.
MoreSCOTUS denies 4 Indiana cases, issues order in pending appeal
February 21, 2012
Michael HoskinsThe Supreme Court of the United States has declined to hear four cases from Indiana, and it has asked the federal government
to weigh in on a pending appeal about alleged workplace harassment involving Ball State University.
MoreSCOTUS won't consider off-campus school speech
January 17, 2012
Michael HoskinsThe nation’s highest court has declined to take a pair of cases asking whether schools can censor the off-campus behavior
of students who post messages or photos against school officials or other students.
MoreSCOTUS denies Indiana church dispute
January 9, 2012
Michael HoskinsThe Supreme Court of the United States has declined to take an Indiana case involving a property and trustee election dispute
between the Zion Temple Apostolic Church in Gary and the son of the deceased founding pastor.
MoreSupreme Court to hear Affordable Care Act challenges
November 14, 2011
Michael HoskinsIn what’s expected to be a historic constitutional test over how much power the federal government has to require individual
mandates for states, the Supreme Court of the United States will consider the constitutionality of the Affordable Care Act
passed in 2010.
MoreSCOTUS takes Indianapolis sewer payment case
November 14, 2011
Michael HoskinsThe Supreme Court of the United States has granted certiorari in a case that questions whether the city of Indianapolis violated
the federal Constitution in how it handled refunds for residents who paid assessments on local sewer projects.
MoreSCOTUS won't take Indiana bar exam case
October 11, 2011
Michael HoskinsThe Supreme Court of the United States has declined to take several Indiana cases, including a federal suit against the state’s
Board of Law Examiners filed by a man who wants to take the bar exam without going to law school.
MoreSCOTUS doesn't take any Indiana cases
October 3, 2011
Michael HoskinsThe Supreme Court of the United States has declined to take several Indiana cases, including a criminal appeal about whether
a stun belt restraint on a defendant during trial and sentencing is prejudicial.
MoreSCOTUS denies case between Indiana agencies on 11th Amendment
April 25, 2011
Michael HoskinsThe Supreme Court of the United States won’t take an Indiana case which delved into whether the 11th Amendment prohibits
an independent state agency from suing a traditional state agency in federal court.
MoreSCOTUS declines to consider Indiana case
January 10, 2011
Michael HoskinsThe nation’s highest court has refused to consider an Indiana case involving whether a defendant’s no contest
plea to an out-of-state murder can be used to qualify him as a serious violent felon on a conviction here.
MoreSCOTUS takes case on whether vehicular flight from police is a 'violent felony'
December 8, 2010
Michael HoskinsNo one disputes fleeing in a vehicle from police is a crime. But whether that crime is considered a “violent”
one worthy of an enhanced sentence under a long-standing federal career criminal statute is a legal nuance now an issue before
the nation’s highest court, and Indiana is playing a key role.
MoreSponsored by
on Facebook & Twitter
on Facebook & Twitter
Indiana Lawyer on Facebook
ADVERTISEMENT
Court Calendar
-
May 28, 2013 The Estate of Richard A. Mayer and Spangler, Jennings & Dougherty, P.C., v. Lax, Inc., and David Lasco - 5/28/13
-
June 12, 2013 Northern Assurance Company of America v. Thomson, Inc., et al. - 6/12/13
-
June 18, 2013 State of Indiana v. Robert Owens - 6/18/13
-
June 18, 2013 Winston K. Wood v. State of Indiana - 6/18/13
ADVERTISEMENT
Back to TopCopyright © All Rights Reserved. Privacy Policy | Terms of Use.
Design, CMS, Hosting & Web Development :: ePublishing.
Additional Hosting & Delivery by
Never heard of remand to another state. How often does that happen?
I highly recommend Deanna and her team of professionals that serve the legal community. Great information and many thanks for sharing.
they are pushing these cases against lawyers too far. thought-crime.
vagueness cannot challenged, so let's write all laws vaguely and throw the constitution out the window.Even if the court is operating under a particular law, if they don't it they will change it to their liking. What a joke!!!
Two convictions becomes one conviction with exactly the same sentence, only it is not clear wheter or not that sentence will be 18 months, 120 months or 138 months. Actually if the guns were in a home, whether or not they were his, he is protected under the 2nd amendment. Jurors need to learn the law and the constitution before judging others. The cour5ts need to do this as well.