Wealth Management & Financial Planning
First Merchants Bank accused of overdraft fee violations
May 29, 2013
Chris O'MalleyA lawsuit alleges that Muncie-based First Merchants Bank manipulated the timing of customers’ transactions to cause
their checking accounts to bounce more frequently, generating millions of dollars in overdraft fees.
MoreReagan administration counsel to participate in symposium at McKinney
March 18, 2013
IL StaffA former Reagan administration official will join the group of academic, government and business leaders making presentations
next month at Indiana University Robert H. McKinney School of Law’s symposium on the Law and Financial Crisis.
MoreSmartphones replacing cash
January 16, 2013
Mobile payments are becoming popular, but consumers must proactively protect against fraud.
MoreConfronting shrinking interest rates
January 16, 2013
Kathleen McLaughlinInvestment strategists: Don't assume fixed-income means no risk
MoreSponsored by
on Facebook & Twitter
on Facebook & Twitter
Indiana Lawyer on Facebook
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Back to TopCopyright © All Rights Reserved. Privacy Policy | Terms of Use.
Design, CMS, Hosting & Web Development :: ePublishing.
Additional Hosting & Delivery by
The court of appeals not only tries to rewrite or interpret the law to suit their fancy, now they choose play stupid as well. Every consideration must be given to pro se litigants, who are not held to the same standards as attorneys, as stated by,SCOTUS. I assume they didn't have a lawyer, since one wasn't mentioned and I strongly suggest thatb the rest of the, origional petitioners get back in there and fight for their rights.
the irony of situations like this is that the clients whom conour cheated are the ones who should be pulling hardest for him to remain free and keep his law license, so they have some hopes of him paying back. really bury the guy deep and then there will be little hope of restitution
Qualified immunity, means that if you wear a badge, you are exempt from law and free to do anything you please! The courts will back badge toting individuals, because they think they are above the law as well. They think, they have judicial immunity, they do not.
Deeply, deeply concerned? I'll bet if it was the judge's money that had been swindled we'd see deep concern with actual consequences. First a Ponzi scheme, then a shell game with the assets…c'mon, hasn't Conour abused the judicial system and his clients long enough? I say enough already.
Wow, just wow.