January 25, 2013
Dave StaffordA 15-year-old who fathered a child was not deprived due process because a guardian ad litem wasn’t appointed for him
during proceedings in which his parental rights were terminated.
More
December 12, 2012
IL StaffIndiana’s State Office of the GAL/CASA has been awarded a $40,000 grant from the National Court Appointed Special Advocate
Association. The money will be used to support local programs that provide volunteer advocacy for abused and neglected children
in Indiana.
More
May 9, 2012
Holly WheelerAs Court Appointed Special Advocate for Marion County, Child Advocates is celebrating its 30th anniversary, having assisted
more than 75,000 children since its inception. Today, the organization advocates for every child involved in a Marion County
abuse or neglect case – more than 5,000 annually – with the help of more than 400 volunteers.
More
March 5, 2012
IL StaffThe Indiana Child Advocates Network and the State Office of GAL/CASA of the Division of State Court Administration held a
rally at the Indiana Statehouse Monday morning to highlight the need for and the importance of court appointed special advocates.
More
September 23, 2011
IL StaffRegistrations for the 15th annual GAL/CASA statewide conference must by postmarked by Sept. 26. The event is from 9 a.m. to
5 p.m. Oct. 15 at the Indianapolis Marriott East, 7202 E. 21st St., Indianapolis.
More
September 14, 2011
Jenny MontgomeryThe state sees improvement, but aims to do better.
More
November 24, 2010
Rebecca BerfangerFor foster youth who are about to age out of the system or have already done so, there often is no support system. That decreases
one’s chance of getting a good education and increases the likelihood that the former foster youth will end up homeless
or become involved in illegal activity and be arrested after aging out.
More
July 14, 2010
Jennifer NelsonThe Indiana Office of Guardian Ad Litem/Court Appointed Special Advocate is one of 16 programs in the National CASA Association
that will use a pilot program to help young adults leaving foster care.
More
June 30, 2009
Michael HoskinsIn a significant opinion about the funding of child welfare cases, the Indiana Court of Appeals ruled today that any guardian
ad litem or Child Appointed Special Advocate fees associated with a child in need of services case must be paid by the county
and not the state agency that lawmakers gave more oversight power to in the past year.
More
April 7, 2009
IL StaffWhile more than 4,000 Indiana children remain on a waiting list for advocates in cases that involve abuse and neglect, Guardian
Ad Litem/Court Appointed Special Advocates programs recruited and trained 911 new volunteers, a 50 percent increase from 2007,
according to the 2008 statewide Court Appointed Special Advocates statistics made available today.
More
April 3, 2009
Jennifer NelsonThe Indiana Supreme Court granted three transfers Thursday to cases involving what manner an appellate court could reverse
a revocation of probation, how to calculate guardian ad litem fees, and whether there is a rebuttable presumption that children
ages 7 through 14 can't be found contributorily negligent.
More
December 11, 2008
Jennifer NelsonKids' Voice of Indiana learned today the organization's application to become certified by the United Way has been
approved.
More
Judge Roger B. Cosbey is unethical and bias toward African American who seeks justice in Title VII claims. He disrespected and used his authority to attempt to intimidate me into taking an unfair settlement and when I refused he proceeded to get my case dismissed and to deny me my Constitutional and Civil Rights. He disobeying several rules of law; specifically, by ruling on summary judgment motions against the Fed. R. Civ. P., without authority of Judge William C. Lee, without consent of the attorneys, and with conspiracy to commit “fraud on the court,” as he conspired with my former attorney. He proved to me that he is bias, unethical, unfair and unfit to be reappointed. In my opinion, he should be disbarred in 2013, for committing fraud on the court, which would make him ineligible for reinstatement in 2014. See docket 3:07 cv 629 where he rules on dispositive motions, knowing magistrates are not vested with that power (especially without consent), grants the defendant an unconscionable number of extensions, accepts my former attorney request for extension for dispositive motion knowing he was working with the opposition, and unbelievably grants the defendant another extension after he requested an extension after he missed the deadline. I know another attorney filed charges against him for bias in race discrimination case(s). I know what he did in my case before he voluntarily recused himself, I just do not know how many other innocent people have been stripped of their rights because of him. I say shame on him and no more of the same.
they are pushing these cases against lawyers too far. thought-crime.
vagueness cannot challenged, so let's write all laws vaguely and throw the constitution out the window.Even if the court is operating under a particular law, if they don't it they will change it to their liking. What a joke!!!
Two convictions becomes one conviction with exactly the same sentence, only it is not clear wheter or not that sentence will be 18 months, 120 months or 138 months. Actually if the guns were in a home, whether or not they were his, he is protected under the 2nd amendment. Jurors need to learn the law and the constitution before judging others. The cour5ts need to do this as well.
With all due respect, Rick, I think you probably would be making a mistake by going to law school. The job market for attorneys is so saturated, you may well find yourself unemployed and with a lot of debt. You mention law would be a good supplement to your skills. True. But employers unfortunately don't value that. You will find that a law degree may well pigeonhole you into an attorney slot and limit career options. If you have a good job now I would hold onto that. As an attorney, you may well end up making less with the aforementioned debt.