May 23, 2013
Dave StaffordFormer Hancock County coroner Tamara Vangundy paid for negligent legal advice on her plea deal in a drunken-driving and official-misconduct
case that ended her career as an elected official, she alleges in a legal malpractice claim filed against former Marion County
Prosecutor Carl Brizzi.
More
May 20, 2013
Dave StaffordA federal prison sentence of more than 33 years was upheld Monday for a career criminal convicted of leading police on a chase,
assaulting an officer until he lost consciousness and staging an armed, four-hour standoff at an Indianapolis hotel in August
2011.
More
May 13, 2013
Cory SchoutenThe top deputy under former Marion County Prosecutor Carl Brizzi has agreed to plead guilty to a federal charge for his role
in the early release of a woman convicted in a murder-for-hire scheme.
More
May 10, 2013
Jennifer NelsonEven if the Indiana Court of Appeals was to assume that a defendant’s trial counsel performed below prevailing professional
norms by not explaining the potential immigration consequences of his guilty plea, the judges ruled the defendant wasn’t
prejudiced because the trial court explained those consequences.
More
April 9, 2013
Marilyn OdendahlAlthough a gun buyer had his sentence affirmed, his argument for reduced time has caused the 7th Circuit Court of Appeals
to call upon the Sentencing Commission to clarify a section of the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines.
More
March 21, 2013
Jennifer NelsonThe Indiana Supreme Court on Thursday reversed the part of a White Superior Court’s sentencing order that a man who
pleaded guilty to theft and being a habitual offender must serve his sentence consecutively with a case out of Tippecanoe
County.
More
February 18, 2013
Jennifer NelsonA citizen of Ecuador who has lived in the U.S. since he was one year old was unable to convince the Indiana Court of Appeals
in separate cases that his counsel’s failure to inform him of the possible deportation consequences of pleading guilty
to a crime should result in post-conviction relief.
More
January 11, 2013
Dave StaffordThe Indiana Court of Appeals reversal of an adult murder conspiracy conviction of a then-12-year-old should be reviewed by
the state Supreme Court, Attorney General Greg Zoeller said in a statement late Thursday.
More
January 4, 2013
Cory SchoutenIndianapolis attorney and developer Paul J. Page has agreed to cooperate with federal prosecutors in an investigation that
also targets former Marion County Prosecutor Carl Brizzi.
More
October 25, 2012
Jennifer NelsonA jury trial set for this week for a Monroe County attorney accused of stealing money from clients has been cancelled because
a plea agreement has been reached.
More
October 24, 2012
Dave StaffordSentenced at 12 for conspiracy to commit murder, Paul Henry Gingerich's appeal claims due process violations.
More
September 14, 2012
Jennifer NelsonThe Indiana Court of Appeals used its decision on a post-conviction relief appeal to “encourage” criminal defense
attorneys to find out the citizenship of their clients and advise the clients as to the risks of deportation after pleading
guilty.
More
August 31, 2012
IL StaffA West Lafayette pharmacy owner was sentenced to four years and 9 months in federal prison for defrauding the state’s
Medicaid program. He was also ordered to repay Medicaid and pay taxes owed.
More
June 6, 2012
Jenny MontgomeryA trial court erred in sentencing a man who was on probation for one offense when he committed another, the Indiana Court
of Appeals ruled.
More
March 29, 2012
Jennifer NelsonThe Indiana Court of Appeals was divided over whether a man could challenge his sentence following a guilty plea. One judge
maintained that the defendant did not consent to his illegal sentence.
More
August 24, 2011
Michael HoskinsA three-judge panel for the 7th Circuit Court of Appeals has determined a landmark decision from the Supreme Court of the
United States last year isn't retroactive. That rule required criminal defense attorneys to advise clients about the immigration
impact of signing a guilty plea, and this means past cases wouldn’t benefit from that holding even if those individuals
had been deprived of that Sixth Amendment right.
More
Judge Roger B. Cosbey is unethical and bias toward African American who seeks justice in Title VII claims. He disrespected and used his authority to attempt to intimidate me into taking an unfair settlement and when I refused he proceeded to get my case dismissed and to deny me my Constitutional and Civil Rights. He disobeying several rules of law; specifically, by ruling on summary judgment motions against the Fed. R. Civ. P., without authority of Judge William C. Lee, without consent of the attorneys, and with conspiracy to commit “fraud on the court,” as he conspired with my former attorney. He proved to me that he is bias, unethical, unfair and unfit to be reappointed. In my opinion, he should be disbarred in 2013, for committing fraud on the court, which would make him ineligible for reinstatement in 2014. See docket 3:07 cv 629 where he rules on dispositive motions, knowing magistrates are not vested with that power (especially without consent), grants the defendant an unconscionable number of extensions, accepts my former attorney request for extension for dispositive motion knowing he was working with the opposition, and unbelievably grants the defendant another extension after he requested an extension after he missed the deadline. I know another attorney filed charges against him for bias in race discrimination case(s). I know what he did in my case before he voluntarily recused himself, I just do not know how many other innocent people have been stripped of their rights because of him. I say shame on him and no more of the same.
they are pushing these cases against lawyers too far. thought-crime.
vagueness cannot challenged, so let's write all laws vaguely and throw the constitution out the window.Even if the court is operating under a particular law, if they don't it they will change it to their liking. What a joke!!!
Two convictions becomes one conviction with exactly the same sentence, only it is not clear wheter or not that sentence will be 18 months, 120 months or 138 months. Actually if the guns were in a home, whether or not they were his, he is protected under the 2nd amendment. Jurors need to learn the law and the constitution before judging others. The cour5ts need to do this as well.
With all due respect, Rick, I think you probably would be making a mistake by going to law school. The job market for attorneys is so saturated, you may well find yourself unemployed and with a lot of debt. You mention law would be a good supplement to your skills. True. But employers unfortunately don't value that. You will find that a law degree may well pigeonhole you into an attorney slot and limit career options. If you have a good job now I would hold onto that. As an attorney, you may well end up making less with the aforementioned debt.