March 14, 2012
Jenny MontgomeryAttorneys say more clients are asking about rights and laws.
More
March 8, 2012
Michael HoskinsThe Indiana Court of Appeals has ruled that a Henry Circuit judge correctly dismissed a union’s complaint about a manufacturing
plant closure more than two decades ago, finding that the union failed to prosecute the case for 18 years and that was an
adequate basis for dismissal.
More
March 6, 2012
Jennifer NelsonThe union that filed a lawsuit last month in federal court challenging Indiana’s “right-to-work” law has
withdrawn its emergency motion for a temporary restraining order.
More
February 29, 2012
Jennifer NelsonThe Indiana Court of Appeals has upheld the decision by a trial court to dismiss a company’s state law claims against
a labor union, finding those claims are preempted by a decision of the National Labor Relations Board.
More
February 23, 2012
Jennifer NelsonA northern Indiana labor organization has filed a lawsuit against Gov. Mitch Daniels and other state actors over the recent
enactment of legislation that made Indiana a “right-to-work” state.
More
January 20, 2012
Michael HoskinsMarion Superior Judge David Dreyer has blocked the collection of a $1,000-a-day fine imposed on boycotting lawmakers in the
Indiana House of Representatives, granting a temporary restraining order until he can hold a hearing on the merits of the
issue next week.
More
January 19, 2012
Jennifer NelsonThe Indiana Supreme Court has affirmed the decision by the Review Board of the Indiana Department of Workforce Development
granting unemployment benefits to Chrysler workers who took voluntary buyouts.
More
December 20, 2011
Jenny MontgomeryFollowing denials from a union officer, three union panels and a trial court, three former union employees successfully convinced
the Indiana Court of Appeals that they are entitled to payment for their accrued vacation time. But the COA opinion was not
unanimous.
More
December 7, 2011
Jenny MontgomeryIndiana legislators disagree about merits of right-to-work legislation.
More
November 9, 2011
Jenny MontgomeryThe Occupational Safety and Health Administration previously announced it would begin enforcing fall protection plans for
residential contractors as of Oct. 1 this year. However, on Sept. 29, Jeffry Carter, deputy commissioner of labor for Indiana
OSHA, issued a memo that said federal OSHA administrators decided to push back enforcement to March 15, 2012.
More
October 28, 2011
IL StaffThe Marion County Prosecutor’s Office has reached a plea agreement in a common construction wage violation involving
an Indianapolis contractor, believed to be the first prosecution of this kind in Indiana.
More
September 27, 2011
IL StaffOn Oct. 3, the University of Notre Dame Law School will host presenters from the Fair Labor Association and civil rights and
apparel industry experts to discuss “Migration and Modern-Day Slavery in Supply Chains.”
More
July 1, 2011
Jenny MontgomeryThe 7th Circuit Court of Appeals has reversed a District Court’s finding that a tow truck driver was not entitled to
overtime pay.
More
June 30, 2011
Jenny MontgomeryCiting Black’s Law Dictionary’s definitions of “solicit” and “induce,” the Indiana Court
of Appeals has affirmed a trial court’s finding that a software company did not violate terms of its contract with another
business.
More
June 9, 2011
Jennifer NelsonIn a discrimination and hostile work environment case, the 7th Circuit Court of Appeals concluded for the first time that
displays of confederate flags in the workplace may support a hostile work environment claim. However, the judges agreed with
the District Court that several African-American nurses formerly employed by a Marion County jail could not support their
legal claims.
More
June 3, 2011
Jenny MontgomeryThe 7th Circuit Court of Appeals has determined that a woman failed to prove that she was subject to a hostile work environment
at Ball State University.
More
May 25, 2011
IL StaffAn environmental expert joins the Maurer School of Law; Indiana University School of Law - Indianapolis will host a labor
law seminar in June.
More
May 18, 2011
IL StaffThis year’s seminar on labor-management relations will take a look at labor law in the age of social media.
More
March 31, 2011
Michael HoskinsA day after the nation’s highest court heard arguments on the largest female gender-discrimination case in history,
the 7th Circuit Court of Appeals has delved into that same territory and upheld a federal judge’s decision denying class
certification in a sex discrimination suit in which a group of female Rolls-Royce employees accused the manufacturer of paying
women less than men for the same or similar work.
More
March 30, 2011
Michael HoskinsWhen it comes to workplace injury, one often overlooked and potentially devastating injury is hearing loss resulting from
high noise levels in a workplace.
More
March 16, 2011
Michael HoskinsAn Indianapolis employment law attorney has been chosen as the newest U.S. magistrate judge for the Southern District of Indiana.
More
March 14, 2011
Jennifer NelsonA plaintiff attempting to sue his employer for breach of contract should have been able to file an amended complaint with
relation back to the date of the original complaint in order to correct the defendant even though the statute of limitations
had expired, the 7th Circuit Court of Appeals concluded today.
More
March 1, 2011
Michael HoskinsAn Indianapolis employment law attorney has been chosen as the newest U.S. magistrate judge for the Southern District of Indiana.
More
January 5, 2011
Jennifer NelsonThe Indianapolis lawyer who worked on several notable cases in Indianapolis history, including a lawsuit which led to the
desegregation of Indianapolis Public Schools, died Dec. 26, 2010.
More
December 28, 2010
Michael HoskinsThe Indiana Court of Appeals has ruled that two former leaders in the Indiana State Teachers Association who served as trustees
for a legally separate insurance trust can’t force the trust’s governing board to adhere to arbitration clauses
outlined in their ISTA employment contracts.
More
Judge Roger B. Cosbey is unethical and bias toward African American who seeks justice in Title VII claims. He disrespected and used his authority to attempt to intimidate me into taking an unfair settlement and when I refused he proceeded to get my case dismissed and to deny me my Constitutional and Civil Rights. He disobeying several rules of law; specifically, by ruling on summary judgment motions against the Fed. R. Civ. P., without authority of Judge William C. Lee, without consent of the attorneys, and with conspiracy to commit “fraud on the court,” as he conspired with my former attorney. He proved to me that he is bias, unethical, unfair and unfit to be reappointed. In my opinion, he should be disbarred in 2013, for committing fraud on the court, which would make him ineligible for reinstatement in 2014. See docket 3:07 cv 629 where he rules on dispositive motions, knowing magistrates are not vested with that power (especially without consent), grants the defendant an unconscionable number of extensions, accepts my former attorney request for extension for dispositive motion knowing he was working with the opposition, and unbelievably grants the defendant another extension after he requested an extension after he missed the deadline. I know another attorney filed charges against him for bias in race discrimination case(s). I know what he did in my case before he voluntarily recused himself, I just do not know how many other innocent people have been stripped of their rights because of him. I say shame on him and no more of the same.
they are pushing these cases against lawyers too far. thought-crime.
vagueness cannot challenged, so let's write all laws vaguely and throw the constitution out the window.Even if the court is operating under a particular law, if they don't it they will change it to their liking. What a joke!!!
Two convictions becomes one conviction with exactly the same sentence, only it is not clear wheter or not that sentence will be 18 months, 120 months or 138 months. Actually if the guns were in a home, whether or not they were his, he is protected under the 2nd amendment. Jurors need to learn the law and the constitution before judging others. The cour5ts need to do this as well.
With all due respect, Rick, I think you probably would be making a mistake by going to law school. The job market for attorneys is so saturated, you may well find yourself unemployed and with a lot of debt. You mention law would be a good supplement to your skills. True. But employers unfortunately don't value that. You will find that a law degree may well pigeonhole you into an attorney slot and limit career options. If you have a good job now I would hold onto that. As an attorney, you may well end up making less with the aforementioned debt.