June 19, 2013
Jennifer NelsonThe American Civil Liberties Union of Indiana has filed a lawsuit on behalf of the Indiana Youth Group challenging the authority
of the state’s Bureau of Motor Vehicles to issue an order of remand on its administrative law judge’s order to
restore the LGBT youth group’s specialty license plate.
More
June 18, 2013
Jennifer NelsonA group of unionized workers laid off by an Indianapolis engine plant who brought an action for breach of the collective-bargaining
agreement didn’t provide enough factual content in their complaint to allow it to proceed in court, the 7th Circuit
Court of Appeals ruled Tuesday.
More
June 18, 2013
Marilyn OdendahlThe Indiana Court of Appeals has found that a cardiologist’s breach of contract complaint may have been “unartfully
drafted,” but it still adequately stated a claim for tortious interference with a contract.
More
June 17, 2013
Marilyn OdendahlThe ACLU of Indiana has slapped the Indiana Family and Social Services Administration with a class-action lawsuit over the
way the state agency operates two of its Medicaid waiver programs.
More
June 12, 2013
Jennifer NelsonFinding that a Hendricks County court didn’t have jurisdiction to dismiss a man’s proposed complaint for damages
under Trial Rule 41(E) or based on noncompliance under the Medical Malpractice Act, the Indiana Court of Appeals Wednesday
reinstated the proposed complaint.
More
June 11, 2013
Jennifer NelsonThe 7th Circuit Court of Appeals held Tuesday that in the absence of a factual inquiry, the mere presence of an integration
clause doesn’t preclude a party from introducing parol evidence that it was fraudulently induced to enter into the agreement
as a whole. The decision came in a dispute involving a settlement agreement that one party sought to invalidate based on claims
of fraudulent inducement.
More
June 10, 2013
Jennifer NelsonBecause there are genuine issues of material fact regarding claims made against apartment management company Flaherty &
Collins in a complaint alleging fraud and other charges dealing with renting apartments to people who did not qualify based
on income requirements, the Indiana Court of Appeals ordered more proceedings on the case.
More
June 7, 2013
Andrea Muirragui DavisAttorneys for the Michigan contractor being sued over construction defects at Carmel’s Palladium concert hall have asked
a Hamilton County court to halt repair work immediately to preserve evidence in the case.
More
June 5, 2013
Marilyn OdendahlAlong with the usual reasons including giving consumers more options, providing price competition and sparking new investment
in the state, Indiana convenience store owners have added a new argument to their push to sell cold beer – it’s
their constitutional right.
More
June 5, 2013
Dave StaffordHealth care providers who’ve been rejected by private malpractice writers turn to a state-run insurer that typically
charges two to three times more for coverage. A class-action lawsuit claims the high-risk pool owes its policyholders a $31
million surplus.
More
May 31, 2013
Dave StaffordA trial court erred in granting summary judgment for an axle manufacturer sued by the estate of a contract truck driver who
died when a load fell on him in an accident that occurred while the facility was closed.
More
May 30, 2013
Jennifer NelsonFour companies that sell novelty items, aromatherapy products and other items have filed a lawsuit against Indiana’s
prosecutors, alleging a newly enacted law that makes it illegal to possess or deal “look-alike” synthetic drugs
is unconstitutional.
More
May 29, 2013
Chris O'MalleyA lawsuit alleges that Muncie-based First Merchants Bank manipulated the timing of customers’ transactions to cause
their checking accounts to bounce more frequently, generating millions of dollars in overdraft fees.
More
May 29, 2013
Jennifer NelsonThe Indiana Court of Appeals – with one judge reluctantly doing so – affirmed a decision by an administrative
law judge that found a religious organization unlawfully retaliated against a family by expelling them from the homeschooling
group. The expulsion occurred after the family sought a dietary accommodation for their teenage daughter at a social event
and later filed a complaint with the Indiana Civil Rights Commission.
More
May 29, 2013
Dave StaffordA federal judge has left the door open for a former Division I college football quarterback to pursue his claim that the NCAA
constitutes an illegal college sports monopoly, allowing him to amend a complaint that had been dismissed.
More
May 23, 2013
IL StaffPrincipals of a politically connected East Chicago group that received $16 million in casino revenue intended to benefit the
city should be held in contempt if they continue to fail to disclose what happened to the money, the state argued in court
Thursday.
More
May 23, 2013
Dave StaffordFormer Hancock County coroner Tamara Vangundy paid for negligent legal advice on her plea deal in a drunken-driving and official-misconduct
case that ended her career as an elected official, she alleges in a legal malpractice claim filed against former Marion County
Prosecutor Carl Brizzi.
More
May 23, 2013
Jennifer NelsonA federal judge in the Southern District of Indiana erred when she determined that a claims adjuster from Ohio was fraudulently
joined to a case that was transferred out of federal court in Ohio to Indiana, the 7th Circuit Court of Appeals ruled. The
case also presented two issues of first impression for the Circuit.
More
May 22, 2013
Jennifer NelsonIn a rehearing requested by a plaintiff whose legal actions were dismissed in Marion Superior Court, the Indiana Court of
Appeals clarified its original holding on how the man may have his actions reinstated.
More
May 22, 2013
Jennifer NelsonThe Indiana Court of Appeals opinion reversing a Marion Superior judge’s denial of a California attorney’s motion
to dismiss a defamation lawsuit filed by Herbert Simon will stand. The state’s highest court split evenly over whether
the trial court should have denied that motion.
More
May 22, 2013
Marilyn OdendahlA LaPorte County woman who lost her home to a fire allegedly started by her estranged husband is at the center of a legal
dispute with her insurance company that could set precedent.
More
May 22, 2013
Anthony SchoettleThe NCAA is facing a potential game-changing legal battle that has some colleges worrying their athletic budgets could be
halved.
More
May 21, 2013
IL StaffOccupy Kokomo protesters filed a lawsuit Tuesday against the Howard County sheriff and members of the sheriff’s department,
claiming violations of their civil rights.
More
May 21, 2013
Dave StaffordA casino patron who passed beneath caution tape and then broke his pelvis in a fall on a snowy and icy parking surface lost
his appeal challenging summary judgment in favor of the casino, which had cordoned off that portion of a parking deck.
More
May 21, 2013
IL StaffThe Bureau of Motor Vehicles acknowledged in response to a multi-million-dollar class-action lawsuit that it “may have
inadvertently overcharged” Indiana residents for driver’s licenses.
More
Interesting that the new laws in criminal code all involve voter fraud
I'm getting divorced and we have prenuptial and judge said it stands even though he made me sign it 2 days before wedding then I be c ame ill and left with nothing butbills
No irony here, John. Conour’s clients are wise to him. Evidently you’ve missed discovery that disclosed Conour was aware he was caught with his hand in the cookie jar, actually many cookie jars, but continued to spend any monies he secured on himself and his lifestyle. Your theory is idealistic and assumes Conour has the soul of a good attorney and therefore he would take care of his clients. Conour has no soul. He greedily took awarded settlements from his disabled clients and spent it on his own edacious desires. You are naïve to think if he kept working he would put his fees into a restitution fund. He is who he is and has proven he will use any means to cheat and manipulate those who trust him and the judicial system that is supposed to protect them. Sorry John, you don’t send the fox back into the hen house after he’s caught devouring the hens. Conour can’t be trusted. He has no more honor than that fox.
The court of appeals not only tries to rewrite or interpret the law to suit their fancy, now they choose play stupid as well. Every consideration must be given to pro se litigants, who are not held to the same standards as attorneys, as stated by,SCOTUS. I assume they didn't have a lawyer, since one wasn't mentioned and I strongly suggest thatb the rest of the, origional petitioners get back in there and fight for their rights.
the irony of situations like this is that the clients whom conour cheated are the ones who should be pulling hardest for him to remain free and keep his law license, so they have some hopes of him paying back. really bury the guy deep and then there will be little hope of restitution