January 11, 2012
Jennifer NelsonThe Indiana Court of Appeals found the state presented sufficient substantive evidence to establish that a man killed his
sister’s boyfriend while staying in her apartment.
More
December 16, 2011
Michael HoskinsArguing that prosecutors must face an actual conflict of interest before they can be removed from a case, the Office of the
Indiana Attorney General wants the state justices to take the high-profile case of a former state trooper being tried for
murders that happened more than a decade ago.
More
December 9, 2011
Jenny MontgomeryThe Indiana Court of Appeals found the circumstantial evidence presented at trial was sufficient to establish beyond a reasonable
doubt that a man killed his wife.
More
November 15, 2011
Jennifer NelsonThe county prosecutor who signed and later cancelled a book deal about his involvement in the murder trial of David Camm will
not be allowed to serve as prosecutor at Camm’s third trial.
More
October 20, 2011
Jennifer NelsonA father’s decision to crash a plane his daughter was in – killing them both – superseded any negligence
that may be attributed to his flight instructor or other defendants in a wrongful death action, the Indiana Court of Appeals
held Thursday.
More
October 18, 2011
Jennifer NelsonThe Indiana Supreme Court has affirmed a man’s murder and robbery convictions and left in place his sentence of life
without the possibility of parole.
More
October 17, 2011
Michael HoskinsThe Indiana Supreme Court has taken two cases and declined to accept more than two dozen petitions seeking transfer.
More
October 14, 2011
Jennifer NelsonThe Indiana Court of Appeals upheld a man’s attempted murder conviction, finding the trial judge did not act in a way
to deny the defendant a fair trial.
More
October 14, 2011
IL StaffIndiana Court of Appeals judges Melissa May, Michael Barnes and Terry Crone will hear a convicted murderer’s appeal
for post-conviction relief at Oakland City University Oct. 19.
More
October 4, 2011
IL StaffA panel of Indiana Court of Appeals judges will travel to northern Indiana Thursday to hear the appeal of a man convicted
of attempted murder.
More
September 28, 2011
Jennifer NelsonThe Indiana Supreme Court has affirmed that a man will serve life in prison without parole for his role in the murders of
seven people in Indianapolis in 2006.
More
September 12, 2011
IL StaffThe Indiana Court of Appeals has schedule oral arguments in the case of the former Indiana State Police trooper accused of
killing his wife and children in 2000.
More
September 9, 2011
Jenny MontgomeryThe Indiana Court of Appeals has upheld a post-conviction court’s determination that a man convicted of kicking another
man to death cannot appeal his conviction.
More
August 30, 2011
Jenny MontgomeryCiting hearsay rules, the Indiana Court of Appeals has affirmed a trial court’s finding that the state may not introduce
into evidence statements that could implicate a man who is facing murder charges.
More
August 30, 2011
Jenny MontgomeryThe Indiana Court of Appeals has found that a juvenile court did not abuse its discretion in waiving a 15-year-old boy’s
murder trial to adult court and that Indiana’s juvenile waiver statute does not violate the Sixth Amendment.
More
August 24, 2011
Jennifer NelsonThe Indiana Court of Appeals has reversed the finding that a man charged with murder is no longer indigent and that his difficult
behavior caused him to waive or forfeit his right to appointed counsel. The appellate court concluded that the judge considered
the defendant’s conduct, not his ability to pay, when finding him no longer indigent.
More
August 15, 2011
Michael HoskinsIf he’d had the ability more than three years ago to factor in a jury’s deadlocked view on the death penalty,
a southern Indiana judge says he would have imposed life without parole rather than the death penalty for a man convicted
of triple murder.
More
August 3, 2011
Michael HoskinsWithin a six-month period, one Indiana county prosecutor faced two situations where he had to make one of the toughest types
of decisions – whether a child should be tried in juvenile or adult court based on the brutality of a crime and age
of the offender.
More
July 20, 2011
Michael HoskinsWhen the Supreme Court of the United States returns for its new term beginning in October, Indiana will likely learn whether
the high court will hear a case relating to a stun-belt restraint used here during a convicted murder’s trial.
More
July 20, 2011
Michael HoskinsThe Indiana Court of Appeals heard arguments July 13 in the post-conviction relief case of a woman convicted of intentionally
setting a fire that killed her young son, leading to what she says was a wrongful conviction and imprisonment 15 years ago.
More
July 8, 2011
Jenny MontgomeryThe Indiana Court of Appeals has ruled that a trial court erred when it accepted a man’s guilty plea to murder, because
the defendant had at the same time claimed his innocence.
More
June 6, 2011
Jennifer NelsonThe Indiana Supreme Court accepted three cases June 3, including two cases in which the Indiana Court of Appeals were split
in their rulings on a drug case and an insurance case.
More
June 2, 2011
Jennifer NelsonThe Indiana Court of Appeals ordered a new trial for a man convicted of murder because the trial court erred by refusing to
instruct the jury on self-defense without the defendant’s testimony.
More
May 18, 2011
Jennifer NelsonThe Double Jeopardy Clause of the U.S. Constitution doesn’t prevent the state from retrying a man who was acquitted
by a jury in the murder of one person, but in which the jury couldn’t return a verdict on the defendant's attempted
murder charge of another man, the Indiana Supreme Court held Wednesday.
More
May 11, 2011
Michael Hoskins
For 11 years, Dale and Connie Sutton’s lives as parents have been about ensuring what they see as justice for their
murdered daughter.
More
I highly recommend Deanna and her team of professionals that serve the legal community. Great information and many thanks for sharing.
they are pushing these cases against lawyers too far. thought-crime.
vagueness cannot challenged, so let's write all laws vaguely and throw the constitution out the window.Even if the court is operating under a particular law, if they don't it they will change it to their liking. What a joke!!!
Two convictions becomes one conviction with exactly the same sentence, only it is not clear wheter or not that sentence will be 18 months, 120 months or 138 months. Actually if the guns were in a home, whether or not they were his, he is protected under the 2nd amendment. Jurors need to learn the law and the constitution before judging others. The cour5ts need to do this as well.
With all due respect, Rick, I think you probably would be making a mistake by going to law school. The job market for attorneys is so saturated, you may well find yourself unemployed and with a lot of debt. You mention law would be a good supplement to your skills. True. But employers unfortunately don't value that. You will find that a law degree may well pigeonhole you into an attorney slot and limit career options. If you have a good job now I would hold onto that. As an attorney, you may well end up making less with the aforementioned debt.