June 24, 2011
Jennifer NelsonThe mother and daughter who were accused of running a “puppy mill” and had animals removed from their homes as
a result of tax law violations are now suing the Indiana attorney general and others involved in the removal of the dogs.
More
May 16, 2011
Jennifer NelsonIn rejecting a man’s argument that his employment wages shouldn’t be subject to Indiana’s adjusted gross
income tax, the Indiana Tax Court warned that those who present a similar argument in the future may be subject to paying
the attorney fees of the other party.
More
May 12, 2011
Jennifer NelsonThe Indiana Supreme Court split Thursday on whether the attorney general’s attempt to recover an erroneously issued
“tax refund” to a company should proceed in state court or in the Indiana Tax Court.
More
May 11, 2011
Jennifer NelsonThe 7th Circuit Court of Appeals had to decide whether the relevant property in a dispute between a bank and the Internal
Revenue Service was the real estate the bank owned or if it was the rentals of that property. Whether the IRS’ tax lien
could take priority over the bank’s lien hinged on the answer.
More
May 11, 2011
Jenny MontgomeryBorn between 1946 and 1964, baby boomers are not like generations that came before them with regard to estate-planning needs.
Many of them are living longer and will be working longer – some by choice and others because the value of their retirement
accounts has plunged in recent years. As they look toward their future, the boomers’ top concerns are asset protection
and paying for long-term care, although each person may have a different approach about how to accomplish those goals.
More
March 28, 2011
Jennifer NelsonThe 7th Circuit Court of Appeals has upheld the finding that a Brownsburg attorney and his wife fraudulently withheld their
2001 income from the Internal Revenue Service through an elaborate shell game.
More
February 9, 2011
Jennifer NelsonJudge Martha Wentworth has handed down her first opinion as Indiana’s Tax Court judge. In her decision, she reversed
the probate court’s finding that an estate didn’t have to file an inheritance tax return on checks issued to a
deceased woman’s brother on an annuity contract.
More
January 31, 2011
Michael HoskinsA Marion Superior judge didn’t err in holding a big tax resolution company in contempt for failing to appear by closing
six of its state offices and then issuing a default judgment against the firm, the Indiana Court of Appeals has ruled.
More
December 22, 2010
Jennifer NelsonThe Indiana Tax Court has denied the state’s motion to dismiss a mother and daughter’s challenge to the jeopardy
tax assessments made against them after the state found they didn’t pay taxes on their sales of puppies.
More
December 15, 2010
Jennifer NelsonAn owner of leased property must prove it possesses an exempt purpose separate and distinct from the exempt purpose of its
lessee to be entitled to statutory exemption, ruled the Indiana Supreme Court in a decision reversing the Indiana Tax Court.
More
December 13, 2010
IL StaffThe Indiana Supreme Court has accepted two cases, one involving how public safety officials notify the driving public about
icy road conditions and a second case delving into what state law requires when it comes to property tax changing land annexations.
More
December 8, 2010
Jennifer NelsonA probate court incorrectly allowed an estate to deduct three farm-related expenses from its inheritance tax return, but affirmed
the deduction of the remaining nine in question, the Indiana Tax Court ruled Tuesday.
More
November 24, 2010
Michael HoskinsThese days, it feels as though Uncle Sam is laughing at estate planning and wealth transfer attorneys.
More
October 5, 2010
Elizabeth BrockettThe Supreme Court today ruled that a contribution by a parent corporation to the capital of its subsidiary is not automatically
excluded from Indiana use tax.
More
November 6, 2009
Jennifer NelsonThe Department of State Revenue erred when it concluded certain money collected from customers of a small, rural telecommunications
company were subject to Indiana's utility receipts tax, the Indiana Tax Court ruled Thursday.
More
October 1, 2009
Jennifer NelsonThe Indiana Tax Court granted a petition for rehearing to clarify its ruling that a Hamilton County property qualified for
a charitable/religious exemption. The Tax Court also denied rehearing a St. Joseph County case that claimed the decision in
that case should be reconsidered based on the original ruling in the Hamilton County case.
More
July 27, 2009
Jennifer NelsonIn an issue of first impression, the Indiana Tax Court decided housing owned by a non-profit that receives governmental subsidies
to rent to low- and moderate-income people at below-market rates is not property used for a charitable purpose.
More
June 17, 2009
Jennifer NelsonThe Indiana Supreme Court was split today in its ruling on whether a hotel was entitled to a sales tax exemption on utilities
it purchased during 2004 and 2005.
More
June 5, 2009
Jennifer NelsonThe Indiana Court of Appeals released an opinion today dealing with a topic that gives many homeowners headaches - property
taxes.
More
March 16, 2009
Jennifer NelsonIn an opinion handed down March 6, the Indiana Supreme Court had to decide whether a previous ruling barred the Indiana Department
of Revenue from raising new contentions in support of a different method of allocation of income to the state.
More
December 15, 2008
Jennifer NelsonThe Indiana Court of Appeals ruled in favor of a woman in two separate cases involving the purchase of her property at tax
sales in Franklin County after determining she received insufficient notice of the sales.
More
October 21, 2008
Jennifer NelsonIn a matter of first impression, the Indiana Tax Court has ruled that a bank didn't need to have a physical presence in
the state to be subject to Indiana's Financial Institutions Tax.
More
Jack, I was only responding to bill's comment of tying everybody in government together. I agree with you though, it takes one bad apple to ruin the bunch.. As in any profession. What's truly unfair is when somebody violates someone's trust and takes complete advantage of someone
John’s comment is unfair. The majority of attorneys can be trusted. Unfortunately, all it takes is one greedy, unscrupulous, immoral attorney to jade the public.
In regards to bill's comment about trusting the cover meant. We can trust them about as much as we can trust attorneys'.
This is disturbing to learn...
Yikes!