January 1, 2008
Jennifer NelsonTrial courts are not required to order a change in custody upon a parental relocation under a 2006 Indiana statute, the Indiana
Supreme Court decided today. The high court ruled trial courts are allowed to modify custody arrangements at their own discretion.
In Valerie Raich Baxendale v. Samuel Raich, III, No. 64S05-0709-CV-372, the Indiana Supreme Court reversed the Indiana
Court of Appeals decision, finding the trial court's balancing of relevant considerations in granting physical custody of
A.R. to Raich was not erroneous....
More
January 1, 2008
Michael HoskinsThe Indiana Supreme Court will hear two arguments Thursday morning.At 9 a.m., justices will hear a direct appeal in David
Camm v. State, No. 87S00-0612-CR-499, which comes from Warrick Superior Court and involves a former state trooper convicted
two years ago of murdering his family.Camm is serving a life sentence without possibility of parole following his second conviction
in the September 2000 murders of his wife and their two children, 7-year-old Bradley and 5-year-old Jill, in southern Indiana.
The Indiana Court...
More
January 1, 2008
Michael HoskinsThe nation's highest court won't take a Vanderburgh County case decided last year by the Indiana Supreme Court, which by a
split vote reinstated the death sentence for a man convicted of murdering his wife and two young children.At its weekly private
conference March 28, the U.S. Supreme Court denied certiorari in Paul M. McManus v. State of Indiana, No. 07-8435. After ruling
in State of Indiana v. Paul M. McManus, No. 82S00-0503-PD-78, June 27, 2007, the Indiana Supreme Court denied a...
More
January 1, 2008
Michael HoskinsWithin a week of filing a federal lawsuit, a settlement has been reached on a case involving a high school student who was
punished for not standing during the Pledge of Allegiance.The Franklin Community School Corp. superintendent said the American
Civil Liberties Union of Indiana has agreed to drop the lawsuit. The school district will pay the student's $1,000 in attorney
fees, clear his school record, and not require participation by standing or any other way during the Pledge of Allegiance...
More
January 1, 2008
Michael HoskinsThe Indiana Court of Appeals decided two environmental cases today involving issues pertaining to lake levels and the rights
lakefront property owners enjoy.In Center Townhouse Corp., et al. v. City of Mishawaka, No. 71A04-0612-CV-707, the court
tackled an issue it hasn't specifically dealt with before and decided not to expand Indiana's riparian rights, or those privileges
extended to waterfront property owners, to include the right of unobstructed view of the water.A group of eight townhome owners
brought an inverse condemnation action against...
More
January 1, 2008
Michael HoskinsNext week will be a big one for Indiana in the Supreme Court of the United States.The nation's highest court will hear six
arguments next week, including a much-anticipated and publicized case involving Indiana's voter identification law, and another
state's case that has Hoosier interest on the constitutionality of lethal injections.On Tuesday, the justices will take on
a pair of Indiana cases. The combined cases are Crawford v. Marion County Election Board, No. 07-21, and Indiana Democratic
Party v. Rokita, No....
More
January 1, 2008
Jennifer NelsonThe Indiana Court of Appeals dismissed an appeal as moot but awarded the defendant appellate attorney fees and costs because
the plaintiff engaged in procedural and substantive bad faith during the appeals process. In Samuel Lesjak v. New England
Financial, No. 29A02-0706-CV-499, Lesjak appealed the trial court's order that he arbitrate a claim filed against him
by New England Financial in a forum other than the National Association of Securities Dealers. Lesjak worked for New England
Securities as a broker/dealer. He registered...
More
January 1, 2008
Michael HoskinsExpect to see David E. Cook's face at the Marion County Public Defender Agency a little longer than anticipated.The chief
public defender is delaying for a month his departure - originally planned for Feb. 15 - to help make sure the agency has
adequate leadership while its board of directors searches for a successor. Cook is stepping down after 12 years as the county's
top public defender to work for immigration firm Gresk & Singleton in Indianapolis.Because the agency needed leadership...
More
January 1, 2008
Michael HoskinsThe Indiana Court of Appeals today upheld a lower court's ruling that the state's law prohibiting violent and child sex offenders
from living within 1,000 feet of a school or public area where children congregate is unconstitutional.The ruling came in
State of Indiana v. Anthony W. Pollard, No. 05A02-0707-CR-640. Judges heard arguments in the case March 31. The state
argued that Indiana Code Section 35-42-4-11 was not considered ex post facto law as applied to Pollard, but the appeals court
disagreed and...
More
January 1, 2008
Jennifer NelsonThe Indiana Supreme Court affirmed today that trial courts must inquire about a defendant's ability to pay when they order
restitution as a condition of probation or a suspended sentence and a restitution obligation continues beyond the end of a
probationary period. However, in Jeffrey Pearson v. State of Indiana, No. 45S03-0712-CR-574, the high court affirmed
the trial court's order for Pearson to pay at least $150 a month in restitution as a condition of his probation even though
the trial court...
More
January 1, 2008
Jennifer NelsonUniversity professors who do not have their fixed-termed contracts renewed after the contract expires are entitled to unemployment
benefits because their resulting unemployment isn't voluntary, ruled the Indiana Supreme Court Tuesday. In Indiana State University
v. William C. LaFief, et al., No. 93S02-0801-EX-17, William LaFief was hired by Indiana State University as an assistant
professor for one academic year and was reappointed for the following year. After his second academic year at the university,
LaFief was told by the school he would...
More
January 1, 2008
Jennifer NelsonContract provisions that exempt a party from liability under the Indiana Crime Victims Statute are void when the party violates
public policy, the Indiana Court of Appeals ruled Friday. In The State Group Industrial (USA) Unlimited v. Murphy & Associates
Industrial Services, No. 82A04-0703-CV-158, State Group appealed the trial court judgment denying the company's request
for relief under Indiana Code 34-24-3-1, the Crime Victims Statute. The trial court awarded State Group actual damages, but
denied relief under the statute based on a...
More
January 1, 2008
Michael HoskinsState lawmakers have announced what topics they'll explore before the 2009 legislative term begins.On tap: immigration, administrative
law judge powers, Indiana's alcoholic beverage laws, and a variety of other legal issues.The Indiana Legislative Council Thursday
created multiple new interim study commissions that will meet this summer. What they recommend helps set the stage for the
next session. Legislative leaders will appoint lawmakers to the panels in coming weeks, and most must make recommendations
to the General Assembly by Nov. 1.One of...
More
January 1, 2008
Jennifer NelsonThe Indiana Court of Appeals upheld a defendant's convictions of child molesting and used the opinion to establish how documents
explaining the underlying analysis of DNA testing may be admitted at a criminal trial.In hearing the appeal of Richard Pendergrass
v. State of Indiana, No. 71A03-0712-CR-588, the appellate court discovered after a thorough review of caselaw that there
was no precedent in place to establish the admittance at a criminal trial of those documents. Richard Pendergrass appealed
his child molesting convictions, arguing...
More
January 1, 2008
Michael HoskinsIndiana's law requiring voters to show photo identification before casting a ballot is constitutional, the U.S. Supreme Court
ruled this morning.The nation's high court issued its decision at 10 a.m. on the pair of consolidated cases, William Crawford,
et al. v. Marion County Election Board, et al., No. 07-21, and Indiana Democratic Party, et al. v. Todd Rokita, No. 07-25.
The decision comes just a week prior to Indiana's primary on May 6, upholding the strictest voter ID law in the...
More
January 1, 2008
Michael HoskinsMarion Superior Judge Grant W. Hawkins is used to spending his days in court. But on Oct. 6 and 7, he wasn't on the bench;
the jurist was the one being judged. Already, his former part-time commissioner has resigned and been permanently banned from
any judicial role because of this issue, and Judge Hawkins is battling 11 misconduct charges against him that could mean his
judicial career is on the line. But before he finds out his fate, the judge is...
More
January 1, 2008
Michael HoskinsTrial courts should be able to deny criminal defendants the right to represent themselves when that person can't communicate
coherently with the court or jury, the Indiana Attorney General's Office wants the nation's highest court to decide.The state
submitted a brief this week to the Supreme Court of the United States, which will hear arguments March 26 in the Hoosier-based
pro se case of Indiana v. Ahmad Edwards, No. 07-208. You can view the 74-page brief online here.Dating to July 1999,...
More
January 1, 2008
Jennifer NelsonThe Indiana Court of Appeals affirmed a judgment enjoining some members of a class action suit from pursuing a quiet title
action, finding the agreements of a settlement disposed of all claims in property between the class and a company.In Fern
E. Firestone, et al. v. American Premier Underwriters Inc. and U.S. Railroad Vest, Corp., No. 06A01-0804-CV-199, the appellate
court had to determine whether the trial court erred in ruling that claims brought by Wayne E. Boyd and Bunker Farms to...
More
January 1, 2008
Jennifer NelsonIn a case of first impression, the Indiana Court of Appeals ruled write-offs constitute insurance benefits for which an insured
has paid directly, and as a result opposing parties in suits can't introduce evidence of write-offs to reduce damage awards.
In Brandon Stanley v. Danny Walker, No. 41A01-0610-CV-462, the appellate court looked to courts in other jurisdictions
for the answer to whether write-offs negotiated by an insurer amount to an "insurance benefit" and should therefore be excluded
when calculating the actual extent...
More
January 1, 2008
Jennifer NelsonThe Indiana Supreme Court granted transfer to one case dealing with child support, and two cases dealing post-conviction relief.
The court also granted transfer to three cases involving sex offenders.In the case Marla K. Young v. Timothy S. Young, No.
09A05-0701-CV-52, the Indiana Court of Appeals affirmed in part and reversed in part the trial court's calculation of Timothy's
child support obligation. The appellate court found the trial court erroneously calculated Timothy's weekly gross income,
and remanded the trial court to add...
More
January 1, 2008
Jennifer NelsonThe Indiana Court of Appeals examined state statutes to determine which apply when a candidate dies before the primary but
wins the election, an issue the court hadn't tackled before. In Dan Lockard v. Charles Miles and John Mullican, No. 84A04-0708-CV-493,
Lockard challenged his loss to Charles Miles in the Terre Haute Democratic primary. Miles died April 18, 2007, nearly three
weeks before the May 8 primary, and media in Terre Haute first reported his death April 19. Lockard and Miles were...
More
January 1, 2008
Michael HoskinsCourt-watchers looking online to view Indiana's appellate decisions have been denied two days of opinions because those published
rulings were not posted online.A set of three dozen opinions came down Tuesday and Wednesday, but a change last month in how
access is provided to those daily rulings meant that only online viewers, those directly involved in a decided case, or those
who've traveled to the Indiana Statehouse to inspect opinions knew that any rulings had been released.By noon today, a list...
More
January 1, 2008
IL StaffThe Indiana Court of Appeals travels north to a Syracuse high school Thursday to hear arguments in a case involving the search
and discovery of drugs in a car. In Jerald J. Womack v. State of Indiana, 43A03-0706-CR-251, Womack appealed his convictions
and sentence for Class D felony marijuana possession and for being a habitual controlled-substance offender. The Court of
Appeals will determine whether the police search of Womack's car violated his rights under the U.S. and Indiana constitutions
and if...
More
January 1, 2008
Michael HoskinsIn a split decision this morning, the Supreme Court of the United States has defined money laundering and tossed out the convictions
of an East Chicago man.The high court ruled on U.S. v. Efrain Santos, et al., No. 06-1005, which involved a money-laundering
ring in East Chicago.A majority of justices held today that "proceeds" according to the federal money-laundering statute applies
only to transactions involving criminal profits, not criminal receipts.Indianapolis attorney Todd Vare with Barnes & Thornburg
argued before the high court...
More
January 1, 2008
Jennifer NelsonA doctor cannot use evidence of a patient's previous surgeries or pursue an incurred-risk defense against a medical malpractice
suit, the Court of Appeals ruled today. In Brenda Spar v. Jin S. Cha, M.D., No. 45A05-0611-CV-683, Spar appealed the
jury decision in favor of Dr. Cha in her medical malpractice claim against the OB/GYN for a surgery he performed on her. Spar
previously had been in a serious automobile accident and as a result had numerous abdominal surgeries. When she decided to...
More
The court of appeals not only tries to rewrite or interpret the law to suit their fancy, now they choose play stupid as well. Every consideration must be given to pro se litigants, who are not held to the same standards as attorneys, as stated by,SCOTUS. I assume they didn't have a lawyer, since one wasn't mentioned and I strongly suggest thatb the rest of the, origional petitioners get back in there and fight for their rights.
the irony of situations like this is that the clients whom conour cheated are the ones who should be pulling hardest for him to remain free and keep his law license, so they have some hopes of him paying back. really bury the guy deep and then there will be little hope of restitution
Qualified immunity, means that if you wear a badge, you are exempt from law and free to do anything you please! The courts will back badge toting individuals, because they think they are above the law as well. They think, they have judicial immunity, they do not.
Deeply, deeply concerned? I'll bet if it was the judge's money that had been swindled we'd see deep concern with actual consequences. First a Ponzi scheme, then a shell game with the assets…c'mon, hasn't Conour abused the judicial system and his clients long enough? I say enough already.
Wow, just wow.