February 13, 2013
Dave StaffordIndiana House Bill 1016 proposes to let court staff provide some rehabilitative services and collect fees for them.
More
February 13, 2013
IL StaffRead who's resigned from the Indiana bar.
More
February 12, 2013
Dave StaffordMore than a decade’s worth of litigation was tied up in a 21-page opinion from the 7th Circuit Court of Appeals on Tuesday,
which affirmed decisions in favor of a landowner against the owners of a nursing home lessee.
More
February 12, 2013
Marilyn OdendahlA husband will not be able to offer as evidence comments made during a mediated settlement conference with his ex-wife, the
Indiana Supreme Court has affirmed.
More
February 12, 2013
IL StaffThe Indiana Supreme Court last week vacated transfer in a criminal case and took up no new cases.
More
February 12, 2013
Scott OlsonAny feelings of satisfaction that executives of Sun Capital Partners had after completing its acquisition of Marsh Supermarkets
Inc. quickly turned to “shock and surprise,” a managing director of the private-equity firm told jurors Tuesday.
More
February 12, 2013
Dave StaffordState senators who are fighting to go to court to defend parts of Indiana’s immigration law – a law that Attorney
General Greg Zoeller concluded could not withstand constitutional scrutiny – will hear a bill Wednesday that would give
them the power to defend their measures in such cases.
More
February 11, 2013
Scott OlsonDon Marsh’s personal pilot told jurors Monday morning that he ferried the former CEO of Marsh Supermarkets Inc. to New
York City at least twice a month in a year’s span to visit one of his mistresses.
More
February 11, 2013
Cory SchoutenAn Indianapolis physician who lost $1.7 million in a fraud scheme orchestrated in part by former Democratic City-County Councilor
Paul C. Bateman Jr. has sued Bateman and two associates in Marion Circuit Court.
More
February 11, 2013
Marilyn OdendahlMarion County Prosecutor Terry Curry has decided to request life sentences without parole, instead of the death penalty, for
the three defendants charged in the Richmond Hill subdivision explosion.
More
February 11, 2013
Dave StaffordA Marion Superior Court should have allowed a defendant to play parts of a police officer’s deposition for impeachment
purposes, but the Indiana Court of Appeals ruled that failing to admit his inconsistent statement was harmless error.
More
February 11, 2013
Dave StaffordAn argument made on appeal in a drunken-driving case that the person who certified the operating condition of a breath-test
machine should have been required to testify was rejected Monday by the Indiana Court of Appeals, which also warned in a footnote
that such a ruling could cost criminal defendants.
More
February 11, 2013
IL StaffApplications are being accepted for a forthcoming vacancy on the St. Joseph Superior Court, the Indiana Supreme Court has
announced.
More
February 8, 2013
Dave StaffordAn Indianapolis man who said he stole a video monitoring system and car wash tickets to teach the victim a lesson about leaving
valuables in an unlocked car lost his appeal Friday.
More
February 8, 2013
Scott OlsonA former top executive of Marsh Supermarkets Inc. became so concerned about the company’s deteriorating finances less
than a decade ago that he took the desperate step of meeting with bankruptcy lawyers.
More
February 8, 2013
Cory SchoutenJohn M. Bales lifted his crossed hands to his face and began to cry Thursday evening as a federal judge read the same jury
verdict on each of 13 fraud counts against the real estate broker and his partner: Not guilty.
More
February 7, 2013
Scott OlsonWithout membership in certain international business organizations, Don Marsh says he could not have built his grocery chain
into a billion-dollar company.
More
February 7, 2013
Cory SchoutenThe jury began deliberations Thursday in the federal fraud trial of Indianapolis real estate broker John M. Bales and partner
William E. Spencer after three hours of spirited closing arguments Wednesday.
More
February 7, 2013
Jennifer NelsonA judge on the 7th Circuit Court of Appeals believed a defendant was entitled to resentencing because the District judge could
only view him through “career-offender tinted glasses” even though the career offender distinction did not ultimately
apply to him.
More
February 7, 2013
Jennifer NelsonThe 7th Circuit Court of Appeals ordered U.S. Judge William T. Lawrence to take another look at a federal prisoner’s
Bivens lawsuit against prison staff and other unnamed defendants, finding that the lawsuit is actually written clearly
and not as long as the judge believed when dismissing it.
More
February 7, 2013
Jennifer NelsonA home health care nurse whose flight from police while high on drugs and with her 89-year-old patient in the car had her
sentence reduced because the Court of Appeals concluded she is not among the “worst offenders.” The high-speed
chase led to a crash and the death of the patient from injuries she sustained.
More
February 7, 2013
Jennifer NelsonAlthough the majority on the Indiana Court of Appeals acknowledged it would have been better for the trial court to follow
the statutory commitment procedures instead of outright denying the state’s motion to commit, it affirmed the trial
court’s conclusion.
More
February 7, 2013
Jennifer NelsonTerry Smith made five arguments to the Indiana Court of Appeals as to why his convictions of robbery and other charges related
to his robbing of an Indianapolis bank should be thrown out, but the judges weren’t persuaded to reverse his convictions.
More
February 7, 2013
Jennifer NelsonThe 7th Circuit Court of Appeals upheld a northern Indiana man’s convictions of distributing crack cocaine and conspiracy
to distribute the drug, but found that he is entitled to resentencing under the Fair Sentencing Act of 2010.
More
February 7, 2013
Jennifer NelsonThe 7th Circuit Court of Appeals concluded two judges in the Northern District of Indiana should take another look at two
defendants’ requests to have their sentences for crack cocaine offenses reduced based on revised sentencing guidelines.
More
The court of appeals not only tries to rewrite or interpret the law to suit their fancy, now they choose play stupid as well. Every consideration must be given to pro se litigants, who are not held to the same standards as attorneys, as stated by,SCOTUS. I assume they didn't have a lawyer, since one wasn't mentioned and I strongly suggest thatb the rest of the, origional petitioners get back in there and fight for their rights.
the irony of situations like this is that the clients whom conour cheated are the ones who should be pulling hardest for him to remain free and keep his law license, so they have some hopes of him paying back. really bury the guy deep and then there will be little hope of restitution
Qualified immunity, means that if you wear a badge, you are exempt from law and free to do anything you please! The courts will back badge toting individuals, because they think they are above the law as well. They think, they have judicial immunity, they do not.
Deeply, deeply concerned? I'll bet if it was the judge's money that had been swindled we'd see deep concern with actual consequences. First a Ponzi scheme, then a shell game with the assets…c'mon, hasn't Conour abused the judicial system and his clients long enough? I say enough already.
Wow, just wow.