January 1, 2007
Michael HoskinsAppellate courts must frequently address claims from convicted criminals that counsel was ineffective, sentences are unreasonable,
or that the charges violate double jeopardy.Rarely does the state concede that convictions violate double jeopardy principles,
as happened in a case decided Tuesday by the Indiana Supreme Court.In Chad E. Strong v. State of Indiana, No. 20S03-0612-CR-529,
the Indiana Attorney General's Office acknowledged the defendant's claim that two convictions - one for murder and another
for neglect of a dependent resulting in the same...
More
January 1, 2007
IL StaffAmong Chief Justice John Roberts' first full term highlights were a number of decisions on race and public schools, free speech,
and abortion. Richard W. Garnett, the John Cardinal O'Hara, CSC associate professor of law at Notre Dame University participated
in a discussion with two other leading U.S. Supreme Court watchers in front of a live audience at the National Constitution
Center in Philadelphia.The July 10 event analyzed highlights of the latest term of the Supreme Court and addressed the question,...
More
January 1, 2007
Jennifer NelsonThe Indiana Tax Court granted summary judgment in favor of the Indiana Department of State Revenue in a controlled-substance
excise-tax case, ruling Monday that charging the tax does not apply to Indiana's joinder and successive prosecution statutes.In
John David Harrison and Jennifer A. Harrison v. Indiana Department of State Revenue, No.49T10-0409-TA-44, the Harrisons
appealed the final determination of the Department of State Revenue, which assessed them with a controlled-substance excise
tax (CSET) on the nearly 6,500 grams of marijuana police found in...
More
January 1, 2007
Michael HoskinsGeneral jurisdiction courts don't have the authority to consider cases involving tax law or the Department of Local Government
Finance, and the Indiana Court of Appeals says it also doesn't have the authority to remand those cases to the Indiana Tax
Court.An appellate panel made its point clear in an opinion on rehearing today in Wayne Township, Marion County, Indiana v.
Indiana Department of Local Government Finance, and Martha Womacks, Marion County Auditor, No. 29A05-0611-CV-661. This comes
as a clarification and...
More
January 1, 2007
Michael HoskinsExecution and the mentally ill continue to be topics before the courts.The Supreme Court of the United States will hear arguments
Wednesday in Panetti v. Quarterman, No. 06-640, a Texas case that asks whether it violates a constitutional ban on cruel and
unusual punishment to execute a delusional inmate who does not understand why he is being put to death.That case is one that
Indiana Supreme Court justices are closely watching to decide how they ;ll handle a condemned man ;s...
More
January 1, 2007
Michael HoskinsThe Indiana Supreme Court has adopted a "substantial trustworthiness" test to determine the reliability of hearsay evidence
in probation revocation hearings.A 5-0 decision came today in George Reyes v. State of Indiana, 01S02-0612-CR-495, which comes
from Adams Circuit Court and involves a man once convicted and imprisoned for aggravated battery. Reyes began probation in
2000 after his release from prison, but in February 2005 his probation officer filed a violation petition because Reyes tested
positive for marijuana. An agreement with the...
More
January 1, 2007
Michael HoskinsA mapping system showing a potential day-care center near a residence wasn't enough to convince to the Indiana Court of Appeals
that a Marion County sex offender's probation should be revoked for staying at the residence one night.The court unanimously
ruled today in Clinton Carden v. State of Indiana, 49A02-0608-CR-700. Marion Superior Magistrate Nancy Broyles had revoked
Carden's four-year probation that was a result of his 2001 guilty plea to one felony count of child molesting and part of
his overall...
More
January 1, 2007
Jennifer NelsonThe Indiana Supreme Court affirmed that both the Board of Zoning Appeals of Evansville-Vanderburgh County and trial court
were correct in denying the construction of a cellular tower that would be located too close to a residence under a county
zoning code.In St. Charles Tower, Inc. v. Board of Zoning Appeals of Evansville-Vanderburgh County, 82S01-0702-CV-69,
the state's highest court yesterday overturned the Court of Appeals ruling that found the BZA's decision to deny St. Charles
the special-use permit was not supported by...
More
January 1, 2007
Michael HoskinsPolice violated a man's constitutional protection rights when officers grabbed him by the throat and squeezed to stop him
from swallowing a plastic baggie of cocaine, the Indiana Supreme Court has ruled.Justices issued a unanimous opinion Thursday
in John Grier v. State of Indiana, No. 49S05-0702-CR-68. The Marion Superior case involved a traffic stop in August 2005,
when officers stopped Grier for having an expired license plate. He was gagging after being ordered out of the car, and when
he opened...
More
January 1, 2007
Michael HoskinsThe Indiana Supreme Court plans to appoint a judge pro tem for Lawrence Circuit Court within days after the local judge was
found dead at his home earlier this week.Judge Richard D. McIntyre, 51, of Bedford was discovered in his detached garage Tuesday
evening by his wife. The Lawrence County Coroner determined he died of likely self-induced carbon monoxide poisoning, according
to an announcement this morning.The Lawrence County native had been the Circuit judge for nearly 20 years, and the county...
More
January 1, 2007
Michael HoskinsThe nearing 2008 presidential election is a key reason why the Supreme Court of the United States should not accept a challenge
to Indiana's two-year-old voter identification law, the Indiana Attorney General's Office argues in a brief filed with the
nation's highest court.Even while recognizing that the constitutionality of voter identification laws is a significant question
that may eventually need review, the 29-page brief filed this week urges the court to deny a petition for certiorari.This
reply follows the July petition...
More
January 1, 2007
Jennifer NelsonThe Indiana Supreme Court has granted transfer to a Marion Superior Court case involving an arrest by an Indianapolis Metropolitan
Police Officer who did not attend the swearing-in ceremony early this year. At issue is whether that arrest should stand.
The Indiana Attorney General's office filed a petition Aug. 27 to bypass the Court of Appeals and transfer the case, State
v. Cheryl Oddi-Smith, 49A05-0708-CR-445, directly to the Supreme Court. The state appeals the Aug. 7 ruling by Marion Superior
Court...
More
January 1, 2007
Michael HoskinsIndiana caselaw is well settled on jurisdiction relating to annexations and incorporations, and a Hamilton Superior judge
has determined Fishers should be allowed to proceed with annexing thousands of acres in Geist.Judge Steven Nation ruled today
on a high-publicity case involving the proposed annexation by Fishers of 2,200 homes in unincorporated Geist area. At issue
was whether the county had jurisdiction over the annexation because of the timeline of petitions filed.In mid-September Fishers
had introduced an ordinance to start annexing the...
More
January 1, 2007
Michael HoskinsTrial judges must work with county officials and share the decision making of how court money is spent, the Indiana Supreme
Court has reiterated.A pair of anticipated rulings issued Wednesday shows how the state's high court will step in when those
disputes can't be managed locally.Justice Frank Sullivan issued both decisions for the unanimous court in Clark County Council
and Clark County Auditor v. Daniel F. Donahue, Cecile A. Blau, Vicki Carmichael, and Steven M. Fleece, 10S00-0606-CV-199,
and In Re: Order for...
More
January 1, 2007
Michael HoskinsThe Indiana Court of Appeals will hear arguments in four cases next week, including one on the road at Plainfield High School.A
three-judge panel will hear arguments Monday in Meridian Insurance v. Cha Cha, Inc., No. 53A01-0608-CV-352, which poses the
question of whether the period for restoration of a business damaged by fire in an adjoining building should be decided by
the courts or through the appraisal process.The following day two panels will hear afternoon arguments - David Scholtman v.
Taza...
More
January 1, 2007
Michael HoskinsSomeone new will soon be overseeing aspects of Indiana's trial court management.Colleen O'Brien, who'd served as executive
director of trial court management for about a year and been with the Supreme Court's State Court Administration division
for about two years, has taken a position as a staff attorney with the Indiana Court of Appeals.The person chosen for this
high-level court position will be responsible for overseeing duties relating to the operation of Indiana's trial courts, including
the administration of a data...
More
January 1, 2007
Michael HoskinsThe Internet is now the main method for getting a look at any opinions, orders, and decisions from Indiana's appellate courts.Starting
today, the appellate clerk's office hopes to save money and be more environmentally friendly by discontinuing its practice
of providing courtesy copies of published orders, opinions, and disciplinary actions. Traditionally, those have been available
to media and news outlets free of charge. The office hasn't calculated the budget savings, but hopes to reduce the paper consumption
by about 88,000 sheets...
More
January 1, 2007
Jennifer NelsonWhether your whole body, the upper half, or just a hand enters someone else's home, that's enough to be considered "entering"
under Indiana statute for conviction of residential entry. The Court of Appeals ruled today on the definition of entering
a dwelling under the residential entry statute, something the courts haven't defined in previous cases. In Robert Williams
v. State, 49A05-0612-CR-688, Williams appealed his conviction for residential entry, a Class D felony, arguing that only
the upper half of his body leaned...
More
January 1, 2007
Michael HoskinsIndiana Chief Justice Randall T. Shepard will co-chair a commission designed to find long-term solutions to the state's property
tax crisis, the governor announced today.Along with former Gov. Joe Kernan, the chief justice will lead the Commission on
Local Government Reform beginning in early August. One of the questions the commission will look at is whether the township
form of government should be abolished.Specifically, questions before the commission will be:- What local government offices
might be eliminated to achieve efficiencies and...
More
January 1, 2007
Michael HoskinsGov. Mitch Daniels today chose a Gary attorney and legal counsel for the Indiana Department of Natural Resources director
for a pair of judicial openings in Lake and Marion counties.Gary attorney Calvin Hawkins will take over as Lake Superior judge
in September, replacing Judge Robert A. Pete who died in March. Admitted to the Indiana bar in 1971, Hawkins has concentrated
his practice in civil and church litigation, as well as bankruptcy, probate, and family law. He earned his law degree...
More
January 1, 2007
Michael HoskinsOne of the first things you'll notice about an Indiana Court of Appeals decision issued today is the number of attorneys and
parties on the case.The first four pages of the 29-page ruling in Travelers Casualty and Surety Company, et al. v. U.S. Filter
Corp., list the parties and respective attorneys. Those include 13 appellant insurance companies and organizations, two appellees-plaintiffs,
and three amici curiae parties from Indianapolis; Washington, D.C.; New York, Chicago; and parts of Michigan.Issues addressed
in this case...
More
January 1, 2007
Michael HoskinsThe Indiana Supreme Court will take its educational Courts in the Classroom program on the road for the first time this fall
as it celebrates its six-year anniversary.A re-enactment of a historic U.S. Supreme Court case arising out the Fort Wayne
area will be the first on the road event Oct. 17 and 18 at the Lincoln Museum. That case, Ex parte Milligan, 71 U.S. 2 (1866),
involved civilians and military tribunals, and the lead defendant, Lambdin Milligan, was from that...
More
January 1, 2007
Michael HoskinsDespite a previous decision to accept a case, the Indiana Supreme Court has decided to revoke its previous order to consider
whether Indiana or Illinois law should apply to a dram shop suit.Now, a Court of Appeals decision from March will stand, meaning
Indiana law applies to the case.Justices this week vacated its July decision to accept transfer in Rebecca Shaw, Individually,
and for the Estate of Kayla Nichole Hughes, and Stephen Hughes v. LDC Enterprises d/b/a I&I Steakhouse, et al., in...
More
January 1, 2007
Michael HoskinsThe Indiana Supreme Court is being asked to toss out a trial judge's order for a Terre Haute mayoral race recount because
the petitioner failed to include the winner's middle initial.Attorney James Bopp Jr. with Terre Haute law firm Bopp Coleson
& Bostrom filed an emergency request Thursday afternoon for the justices to intervene in the recount challenge, contending
that Vigo Circuit Judge David Bolk didn't have jurisdiction to order a recount from the Nov. 6 election. Democratic Mayor
Kevin Burke...
More
January 1, 2007
Michael HoskinsWithin hours of hearing oral arguments, the Indiana Supreme Court decided not to grant transfer to review the case involving
a Kokomo fire captain ;s demotion to firefighter because of comments made from outside the department. The appeals court had
ruled the demotion did not constitute a violation of his First Amendment free-speech rights.The court had not released a decision
by early this afternoon, but the City of Kokomo had posted a press release saying the justices did not agree to...
More
Judge Roger B. Cosbey is unethical and bias toward African American who seeks justice in Title VII claims. He disrespected and used his authority to attempt to intimidate me into taking an unfair settlement and when I refused he proceeded to get my case dismissed and to deny me my Constitutional and Civil Rights. He disobeying several rules of law; specifically, by ruling on summary judgment motions against the Fed. R. Civ. P., without authority of Judge William C. Lee, without consent of the attorneys, and with conspiracy to commit “fraud on the court,” as he conspired with my former attorney. He proved to me that he is bias, unethical, unfair and unfit to be reappointed. In my opinion, he should be disbarred in 2013, for committing fraud on the court, which would make him ineligible for reinstatement in 2014. See docket 3:07 cv 629 where he rules on dispositive motions, knowing magistrates are not vested with that power (especially without consent), grants the defendant an unconscionable number of extensions, accepts my former attorney request for extension for dispositive motion knowing he was working with the opposition, and unbelievably grants the defendant another extension after he requested an extension after he missed the deadline. I know another attorney filed charges against him for bias in race discrimination case(s). I know what he did in my case before he voluntarily recused himself, I just do not know how many other innocent people have been stripped of their rights because of him. I say shame on him and no more of the same.
they are pushing these cases against lawyers too far. thought-crime.
vagueness cannot challenged, so let's write all laws vaguely and throw the constitution out the window.Even if the court is operating under a particular law, if they don't it they will change it to their liking. What a joke!!!
Two convictions becomes one conviction with exactly the same sentence, only it is not clear wheter or not that sentence will be 18 months, 120 months or 138 months. Actually if the guns were in a home, whether or not they were his, he is protected under the 2nd amendment. Jurors need to learn the law and the constitution before judging others. The cour5ts need to do this as well.
With all due respect, Rick, I think you probably would be making a mistake by going to law school. The job market for attorneys is so saturated, you may well find yourself unemployed and with a lot of debt. You mention law would be a good supplement to your skills. True. But employers unfortunately don't value that. You will find that a law degree may well pigeonhole you into an attorney slot and limit career options. If you have a good job now I would hold onto that. As an attorney, you may well end up making less with the aforementioned debt.