June 19, 2013
Kelly LucasLucas offers a few suggestions to a list created about what reporters want - and don't want - when interviewing attorneys.
More
June 19, 2013
Kim BrandYou don’t need to be a technology expert to understand disaster planning. In fact, it may be an advantage not to be.
More
June 19, 2013
Robert HammerleHammerle's take on "Frances Ha": This is a movie that every woman should see who remembers the thrill and torment of being
27.
More
June 5, 2013
Kevin TyraKevin Tyra takes a look at how how perception and psychology shape interactions in general, and interactions among adverse
lawyers in particular.
More
June 5, 2013
Dina CoxLoyalty and independence of judgment are essential to the effective representation of a client. A conflict of interest may
make it impossible to exercise these essentials, or it may create an appearance that is injurious to the health of the lawyer-client
relationship.
More
June 5, 2013
Robert HammerleBob Hammerle says that "Start Trek Into Darkness" captures all the goofy charm that made the TV series so lovable.
More
June 5, 2013
Stephen BourThe summer vacation season is upon us, so today’s article will review a camera that you may find both useful and fun
for your summer adventures. This camera is also useful for video documentation functions at work. It provides a superior video
to the typical cell phone.
More
May 22, 2013
Laurie Gray, a former prosecutor, writes about the recent Indiana Supreme Court decision's impact on medical hearsay exception
for child victims.
More
May 22, 2013
Robert HammerleBob Hammerle recommends you see "The Great Gatsby" on the big screen.
More
May 22, 2013
Kim BrandIn my last column, I confessed I was addicted to interruptions: email, voice mail, texts, phone calls, Twitter feeds, etc.
Studies have shown multitasking lowers IQ.
More
May 22, 2013
In this on-demand era of instant gratification, we expect that information should always be at our fingertips. Our time is
precious and we all want others to respect that fact; in return doesn’t that mean we should all be respectful of the
time that others give to us?
More
May 8, 2013
Gary RobertsOn April 24, the McKinney School was privileged to host a plenary session of the American Bar Association Task Force that
Randy Shepard is chairing on the future of legal education. It was an eye-opening, interesting and, at the same time, unsettling
day.
More
May 8, 2013
Stephen BourThe iPad is a convenient and useful personal device for many daily work (and play) activities. However, when it comes time
to show what is on your 9.7-inch screen and share it with others, the iPad can use a little help.
More
May 8, 2013
David DreyerHave you ever Googled “lawyer dog”? If you do, be prepared to see a limitless line of websites all featuring identical
photos of the same canine seated behind his desk, along with various one-liners related to the law, dogs and just silliness.
More
May 8, 2013
John MaleyWith its limited docket, the U.S. Supreme Court rarely decides procedural issues, focusing instead on weighty constitutional
issues or resolving split interpretations of federal statutes. This term, however, the Supreme Court has addressed several
procedural issues.
More
May 8, 2013
From DTCIThis is not a call for more “civility.” To be candid, I have heard that so many times from so many people that
it has lost all significance to me.
More
May 8, 2013
Robert HammerleIt wasn’t that long ago that I would have given Matthew McConaughey the same chance of receiving an Oscar nomination
as the Supreme Leader of North Korea receiving a Nobel Peace Prize. Times haven’t changed on the Korean Peninsula, but
they certainly have in Hollywood.
More
April 24, 2013
Kelly LucasThrough the profiles in the Leadership in Law award supplement, it is our goal to introduce IL readers to the men
and women behind the public and professional personas.
More
April 24, 2013
Robert HammerleBefore reviewing the movie "42," Bob Hammerle pays tribute to the recent passing of Roger Ebert, Jonathan Winters and Annette
Funicello.
More
April 10, 2013
Hannah BuxbaumTwo months ago, the Maurer School of Law lost an esteemed colleague, friend and teacher who touched the lives of more than
6,000 of our alumni during his 33 years at the law school.
More
April 10, 2013
Sharon McGoffI know what you’re thinking – the task of getting in shape is all too daunting, and I don’t have time to
do it because there are too many areas in my wellness plan that need focus. I hear you! So, together, let’s set a plan
for taking small steps NOW to make big progress by June 1.
More
April 10, 2013
A letter to the editor looks at Marion County's voting technology.
More
April 10, 2013
From DTCIAre you ready to learn what you really need to know to practice defense law? Well, the DTCI is ready to teach you!
More
April 10, 2013
Jennifer Lukemeyer, Fred VaianaWe give La Escollera 3.25 gavels!
More
March 27, 2013
John MaleyIn the Southern District of Indiana, if you are litigating an adverse-action employment case you might be part of a pilot
program that aims to streamline and tailor discovery and scheduling.
More
The court of appeals not only tries to rewrite or interpret the law to suit their fancy, now they choose play stupid as well. Every consideration must be given to pro se litigants, who are not held to the same standards as attorneys, as stated by,SCOTUS. I assume they didn't have a lawyer, since one wasn't mentioned and I strongly suggest thatb the rest of the, origional petitioners get back in there and fight for their rights.
the irony of situations like this is that the clients whom conour cheated are the ones who should be pulling hardest for him to remain free and keep his law license, so they have some hopes of him paying back. really bury the guy deep and then there will be little hope of restitution
Qualified immunity, means that if you wear a badge, you are exempt from law and free to do anything you please! The courts will back badge toting individuals, because they think they are above the law as well. They think, they have judicial immunity, they do not.
Deeply, deeply concerned? I'll bet if it was the judge's money that had been swindled we'd see deep concern with actual consequences. First a Ponzi scheme, then a shell game with the assets…c'mon, hasn't Conour abused the judicial system and his clients long enough? I say enough already.
Wow, just wow.