March 14, 2012
Jennifer Lukemeyer, Fred VaianaJennifer Lukemeyer and Fredrick Vaiana give Maxine's Chicken and Waffles three gavels on the food but four when it comes to
the motivation of those honoring Maxine and Ollie’s obvious love for their children.
More
March 14, 2012
Rodney NordstromThe theme of the book, “Twelve Heroes, One Voice,” is why should jurors care? Why should they care enough to let
go of the natural tendency to do nothing? This question is at the heart of every trial.
More
February 29, 2012
Greg MorrisGreg Morris writes about Indiana Chief Justice Randall Shepard receiving the Frank O'Bannon Sunshine Award.
More
February 29, 2012
Wandini RigginsWandini Riggins writes about attorney and photographer James Strain.
More
February 29, 2012
Matthew Neumann writes about how Facebook and estate planning relate.
More
February 29, 2012
Greg AndrewsGreg Andrews writes his "Behind the News" column about a Carmel couple's federal lawsuit stemming from a tax fraud investigation.
More
February 15, 2012
Kelly LucasEditor Kelly Lucas wants to know whether the racial or gender diversity of candidates should be considered when evaluating
candidates.
More
February 15, 2012
Free expression in this country has withstood repeated assault during times of political upheaval.
More
February 15, 2012
With more demands on my time, I find myself less involved in the state, local, and firm activities and social events. Apparently,
I am not alone.
More
February 15, 2012
Jay ConisonValparaiso University Law School Dean Jay Conison writes that criticizing law schools is the new national pastime.
More
February 15, 2012
Kim BrandEmail is war – you are a prisoner. Your inbox, once littered with annoying spam, now delivers a super-abundance of information.
The torrent defies your effort to organize, classify, prioritize and respond to those that are critical versus those that
are merely interesting. Bad news: it’s only going to get worse.
More
February 1, 2012
Stephen BourStephen Bour looks at using WiDi for law firm and courtroom presentations.
More
February 1, 2012
Computing the lost profits of a business as a result of a wrongful act is a complex task. And many times, the question to
ask is: “But for” a wrongful act, what would the profits be? What would the value be?
More
January 18, 2012
Robert H. McKinney School of Law Dean Gary R. Roberts writes about the multi-million dollar gift the Indianapolis law school
received in December 2011.
More
January 18, 2012
Kelly LucasLucas encourages nominations for an up-and-coming lawyer or distinguished barrister for Indiana Lawyer's Leadership in Law
awards.
More
January 18, 2012
Jennifer Lukemeyer, Fred VaianaFrederick Vaiana suggests what sandwiches should have made the list of the state's top 46 sandwiches.
More
January 18, 2012
John MaleyMaley writes about the Federal Courts Jurisdiction and Venue Clarification Act of 2011.
More
January 4, 2012
The Indiana Lawyer would like to revive the trial report section of the newspaper in 2012.
More
January 4, 2012
Kim BrandAuthor Kim Brand says: you don’t like passwords or complicated password policies and you don’t think a secure
password is worth the trouble.
More
December 21, 2011
Rodney NordstromTrial consultant Rodney Nordstrom offers his thoughts on Alice Weiser's book on using graphoanalysis to pick jurors.
More
December 21, 2011
John MaleyWith the recent passage of the Federal Courts Jurisdiction and Venue Clarification Act of 2011, key statutory changes to removal
and venue are on the horizon.
More
December 21, 2011
Greg AndrewsIndianapolis class-action attorney Irwin Levin just helped lead a legal team that is going to collect more than $6.7 million
in fees in a high-profile Iowa lawsuit involving price fixing in the concrete industry.
More
December 7, 2011
Stephen BourWith the holiday season in full swing, Stephen Bour looks at some smartphone applications that you may find helpful in your
quest for the perfect gifts at the perfect price.
More
December 7, 2011
Kelly Lucas
Editor Kelly Lucas discusses changes to the Indiana Lawyer daily.
More
December 7, 2011
David DreyerA trial judge’s job is often befuddling. We have to differentiate between peoples’ language, their values, even
their competing views about what language means.
More
The court of appeals not only tries to rewrite or interpret the law to suit their fancy, now they choose play stupid as well. Every consideration must be given to pro se litigants, who are not held to the same standards as attorneys, as stated by,SCOTUS. I assume they didn't have a lawyer, since one wasn't mentioned and I strongly suggest thatb the rest of the, origional petitioners get back in there and fight for their rights.
the irony of situations like this is that the clients whom conour cheated are the ones who should be pulling hardest for him to remain free and keep his law license, so they have some hopes of him paying back. really bury the guy deep and then there will be little hope of restitution
Qualified immunity, means that if you wear a badge, you are exempt from law and free to do anything you please! The courts will back badge toting individuals, because they think they are above the law as well. They think, they have judicial immunity, they do not.
Deeply, deeply concerned? I'll bet if it was the judge's money that had been swindled we'd see deep concern with actual consequences. First a Ponzi scheme, then a shell game with the assets…c'mon, hasn't Conour abused the judicial system and his clients long enough? I say enough already.
Wow, just wow.