March 2, 2011
Indiana courts are tackling a giant technology project. It matters because it affects both our efficiency and your ability
to access court information for free. Right now, our state’s 400 trial courts don’t share case information with
each other or with state agencies in the electronic ways that are so common in modern life. There are 21 different computer
systems managing court information in our state. As you can imagine, we believe that is a bad business practice and we’re
working to do better.
More
March 2, 2011
I believe that members of Indiana’s legal profession have a duty to voice their concerns when laws are proposed that
could dramatically affect the civil liberties of individuals living in Indiana. Think about it, what if you could have voiced
your opinion when laws imposing poll taxes or prohibitions against interracial marriages were being considered in some state
legislatures. Would you have done it?
More
February 16, 2011
Judges Mark Stoner and Terry Shewmaker explain why a proposed bill would protect Hoosiers' rights by making sure that law-trained
judges preside over all cases in Indiana.
More
February 16, 2011
Jennifer Lukemeyer, Fred VaianaAuthors give Danville restaurant three gavels.
More
February 16, 2011
After practicing law for nearly four decades, it is a joy to share some thoughts with new lawyers who are beginning their
practice.
More
February 2, 2011
Editorial Indiana LawyerWe often think of law enforcement officers and firefighters as first-responder types who venture into situations where others
are reluctant to go. We’d like to expand the definition of first responder a bit, and bring your attention to an Indianapolis
lawyer who after retiring from his day job years ago decided he wasn’t quite done practicing law.
More
February 2, 2011
David DreyerJudge David Dreyer discusses being an uncivil-holic.
More
February 2, 2011
Stephen BourIf you find that you are often having to e-mail files to yourself or are constantly transferring files via USB drive, then
Dropbox online file storage and syncing may be for you.
More
January 19, 2011
Editorial Indiana LawyerIn our culture, someone accused of a crime gets a vigorous defense to make certain all of the accused person’s constitutional
rights are protected. This is as it should be. Those faced with the loss of their liberty or life deserve no less than the
best defense that can be put forth.
More
January 19, 2011
Jennifer Lukemeyer, Fred VaianaNestled in a bland little strip mall just north of 96th Street on College Avenue, Big Mike’s Café is worth the
small detour it takes to get there.
More
January 19, 2011
John MaleyEffective Jan. 1, the Southern District of Indiana amended three local rules affecting civil practice, plus Local Criminal
Rule 13.1 affecting criminal practice and sentencing (see the court’s website for the text of all rule changes).
More
January 19, 2011
Attorney Donald Doxsee offers advice on opening a private practice.
More
December 22, 2010
Jennifer Lukemeyer, Fred VaianaWe give The Bar 3 gavels!
More
December 22, 2010
John MaleyAs previewed in prior columns, effective Dec. 1 various amendments took effect to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (as
well as appellate, criminal, and evidence rules).
More
December 8, 2010
Editorial Indiana LawyerHere's to hoping reason and sanity will prevail, but we're not holding our breath.
More
December 8, 2010
David DreyerJudge David Dreyer writes about judges doing their jobs on controversial topics.
More
December 8, 2010
A reader writes a letter in support of Marion County's hybrid method of selecting trial judges.
More
December 8, 2010
Stephen BourToday’s review will discuss the latest Droid phones by Motorola and their Android software.
More
November 24, 2010
An anonymous young lawyer in Indianapolis discusses her anxiety issues and the Judges and Lawyers Assistance Program.
More
November 24, 2010
From DTCIWhen a patient is harmed during a medical procedure, a patient may elect to file a medical negligence claim against his physician
and the health care facility in which the procedure occurred. However, when a patient is harmed during a hospitalization,
should the claim still be pursued as one of medical negligence or is it more appropriately a premises liability claim?
More
November 24, 2010
Jennifer Lukemeyer, Fred VaianaAttorneys give Merrillville's Gamba Ristorante four gavels.
More
November 10, 2010
Editorial Indiana LawyerIt’s a silent and devastating problem going on right under our noses, and it’s going to take courage and a willingness
to ask invasive and uncomfortable questions to stop it.
More
October 27, 2010
Editorial Indiana LawyerThis was one retirement ceremony we were not looking forward to attending, fearing that the gentleman stepping away from the
bench would slip away from public life and live quietly with his family, indulging his interests outside the law, while working
as a mediator at Van Winkle Baten Rimstidt and senior judging for the Indiana Court of Appeals.
More
October 27, 2010
Jennifer Lukemeyer, Fred VaianaLukemeyer and Vaiana visit Zaharakos in Columbus, Ind.
More
October 27, 2010
Jeffrey CrabillWhen the name Rabb Emison comes to my mind, I immediately think of the word “great.”
More
Judge Roger B. Cosbey is unethical and bias toward African American who seeks justice in Title VII claims. He disrespected and used his authority to attempt to intimidate me into taking an unfair settlement and when I refused he proceeded to get my case dismissed and to deny me my Constitutional and Civil Rights. He disobeying several rules of law; specifically, by ruling on summary judgment motions against the Fed. R. Civ. P., without authority of Judge William C. Lee, without consent of the attorneys, and with conspiracy to commit “fraud on the court,” as he conspired with my former attorney. He proved to me that he is bias, unethical, unfair and unfit to be reappointed. In my opinion, he should be disbarred in 2013, for committing fraud on the court, which would make him ineligible for reinstatement in 2014. See docket 3:07 cv 629 where he rules on dispositive motions, knowing magistrates are not vested with that power (especially without consent), grants the defendant an unconscionable number of extensions, accepts my former attorney request for extension for dispositive motion knowing he was working with the opposition, and unbelievably grants the defendant another extension after he requested an extension after he missed the deadline. I know another attorney filed charges against him for bias in race discrimination case(s). I know what he did in my case before he voluntarily recused himself, I just do not know how many other innocent people have been stripped of their rights because of him. I say shame on him and no more of the same.
they are pushing these cases against lawyers too far. thought-crime.
vagueness cannot challenged, so let's write all laws vaguely and throw the constitution out the window.Even if the court is operating under a particular law, if they don't it they will change it to their liking. What a joke!!!
Two convictions becomes one conviction with exactly the same sentence, only it is not clear wheter or not that sentence will be 18 months, 120 months or 138 months. Actually if the guns were in a home, whether or not they were his, he is protected under the 2nd amendment. Jurors need to learn the law and the constitution before judging others. The cour5ts need to do this as well.
With all due respect, Rick, I think you probably would be making a mistake by going to law school. The job market for attorneys is so saturated, you may well find yourself unemployed and with a lot of debt. You mention law would be a good supplement to your skills. True. But employers unfortunately don't value that. You will find that a law degree may well pigeonhole you into an attorney slot and limit career options. If you have a good job now I would hold onto that. As an attorney, you may well end up making less with the aforementioned debt.