January 31, 2012
Jenny MontgomeryThe Indiana Court of Appeals has affirmed a voyeurism charge for William R. Wallace, a former candidate for Gibson County
prosecutor. Wallace, who videotaped himself and a woman engaged in sexual intercourse, had filed an interlocutory appeal,
claiming that he was innocent of Class D felony voyeurism because the sex was consensual.
More
January 31, 2012
IL StaffThe Indiana Supreme Court granted transfer in four cases for the week ending Jan. 27 and denied transfer in 11 others.
More
January 30, 2012
IL StaffThe Indiana Supreme Court will hear the state's appeal in the lawsuit over collecting fines imposed on absent members
of the Legislature. The state's highest court on Friday ruled 4-1 to accept jurisdiction of the interlocutory appeal sought
by the Indiana attorney general's office, which represents the state and officials named as defendants in the legislative
fines lawsuit, Crawford v. Berry.
More
January 27, 2012
Jennifer NelsonFifteen people have applied to be the next Indiana Supreme Court justice, the high court announced Friday. They are vying
to replace Chief Justice Randall T. Shepard, who will leave the bench March 4.
More
January 27, 2012
Michael HoskinsThe Indiana Supreme Court has announced a new 18-month pilot project allowing trial court proceedings to be webcast in three
Lake County courtrooms.
More
January 24, 2012
IL StaffThe Indiana Supreme Court granted transfer to two cases last week, in which they issued decisions, and denied transfer to
eight other cases.
More
January 23, 2012
Michael HoskinsThe Indiana Supreme Court has adopted a repayment plan for an Indianapolis company it found engaged in the unauthorized practice
of law, ordering officials to reimburse the state bar association and former clients during the next six years.
More
January 20, 2012
Jennifer NelsonThe Indiana Supreme Court has affirmed a $1 million excess damages award from the Indiana Patient’s Compensation Fund
to the estate of a man who died following a truck accident, determining the fund is not entitled to a reduction of the award
to account for the 20 percent chance the man would have died even without the doctor’s negligence.
More
January 19, 2012
Jennifer NelsonThe Indiana Supreme Court has affirmed the decision by the Review Board of the Indiana Department of Workforce Development
granting unemployment benefits to Chrysler workers who took voluntary buyouts.
More
January 18, 2012
Jennifer NelsonThe majority of Indiana Supreme Court justices found the trial court was within its discretion to dismiss a personal injury
action because of the plaintiff’s attorney’s actions.
More
January 18, 2012
Michael HoskinsShepard says state courts are no longer 'Lone Rangers.'
More
January 18, 2012
IL StaffRead summaries of the For Publications from the Indiana appellate courts and the 7th Circuit Court of Appeals.
More
January 17, 2012
Michael HoskinsThe Indiana Supreme Court has ordered United Financial Systems Corp. and its officials to pay the court and a special master
$16,003 for the costs associated with an Unauthorized Practice of Law action that has been ongoing for more than three years.
More
January 17, 2012
Jenny MontgomeryA Senate committee voted unanimously to pass a bill that would allow a person to resist the unlawful entry into a dwelling
by a law enforcement officer under certain conditions.
More
January 13, 2012
Michael HoskinsA Hancock County deputy prosecutor has received a public reprimand from the Indiana Supreme Court for surrendering prosecutorial
discretion and allowing a corporate check fraud victim to
dictate the terms of restitution as a pre-condition to a plea agreement.
More
January 13, 2012
Michael HoskinsThe Indianapolis attorney who violently attacked and attempted to kill a state representative has been permanently disbarred
by the Indiana Supreme Court.
More
January 12, 2012
Michael HoskinsIndiana Chief Justice Randall T. Shepard gave his final State of the Judiciary on Wednesday, recapping not only the past 12
months, but also highlighting court initiatives and changes that have occurred during the quarter century he spent as chief
justice.
More
January 12, 2012
Jennifer NelsonBecause the state didn’t offer allowable evidence of a man’s previous theft conviction to support a habitual offender
enhancement, the Indiana Supreme Court reversed the enhancement.
More
January 12, 2012
Jennifer NelsonThe Indiana Supreme Court has vacated transfer to a case involving a proposed medical malpractice claim, finding that the
trial court order at issue is not a final appealable judgment.
More
January 11, 2012
IL StaffThe Office of the Indiana Attorney General has asked the Indiana Supreme Court to take the Indiana Recount Commission’s
appeal of the finding that Secretary of State Charlie White was ineligible to be on the November 2010 ballot.
More
January 10, 2012
Jennifer NelsonThe Indiana Supreme Court ruled 3-1 Tuesday that an insurer for the Indiana Youth Soccer Association does not have to provide
coverage for an accident involving a Carmel team during a trip to Colorado for a soccer tournament.
More
January 10, 2012
Michael HoskinsIndiana Chief Justice Randall T. Shepard on Wednesday will give his annual State of the Judiciary address to a joint session
of the Indiana General Assembly, the final time he will do so before retiring in March.
More
January 9, 2012
IL StaffThe Indiana Supreme Court has accepted four cases on transfer.
More
January 9, 2012
Michael HoskinsThe Indiana Supreme Court will decide whether Gov. Mitch Daniels must appear for a deposition and testify in an ongoing lawsuit
challenging the cancelled IBM contract to modernize the state’s welfare system.
More
January 6, 2012
Michael Hoskins
The Indiana Court of Appeals has found a man’s three convictions on non-payment of child support for his three children
don't violate double jeopardy principles, even though that issue is currently pending in another case before the Indiana
Supreme Court.
More
Judge Roger B. Cosbey is unethical and bias toward African American who seeks justice in Title VII claims. He disrespected and used his authority to attempt to intimidate me into taking an unfair settlement and when I refused he proceeded to get my case dismissed and to deny me my Constitutional and Civil Rights. He disobeying several rules of law; specifically, by ruling on summary judgment motions against the Fed. R. Civ. P., without authority of Judge William C. Lee, without consent of the attorneys, and with conspiracy to commit “fraud on the court,” as he conspired with my former attorney. He proved to me that he is bias, unethical, unfair and unfit to be reappointed. In my opinion, he should be disbarred in 2013, for committing fraud on the court, which would make him ineligible for reinstatement in 2014. See docket 3:07 cv 629 where he rules on dispositive motions, knowing magistrates are not vested with that power (especially without consent), grants the defendant an unconscionable number of extensions, accepts my former attorney request for extension for dispositive motion knowing he was working with the opposition, and unbelievably grants the defendant another extension after he requested an extension after he missed the deadline. I know another attorney filed charges against him for bias in race discrimination case(s). I know what he did in my case before he voluntarily recused himself, I just do not know how many other innocent people have been stripped of their rights because of him. I say shame on him and no more of the same.
they are pushing these cases against lawyers too far. thought-crime.
vagueness cannot challenged, so let's write all laws vaguely and throw the constitution out the window.Even if the court is operating under a particular law, if they don't it they will change it to their liking. What a joke!!!
Two convictions becomes one conviction with exactly the same sentence, only it is not clear wheter or not that sentence will be 18 months, 120 months or 138 months. Actually if the guns were in a home, whether or not they were his, he is protected under the 2nd amendment. Jurors need to learn the law and the constitution before judging others. The cour5ts need to do this as well.
With all due respect, Rick, I think you probably would be making a mistake by going to law school. The job market for attorneys is so saturated, you may well find yourself unemployed and with a lot of debt. You mention law would be a good supplement to your skills. True. But employers unfortunately don't value that. You will find that a law degree may well pigeonhole you into an attorney slot and limit career options. If you have a good job now I would hold onto that. As an attorney, you may well end up making less with the aforementioned debt.