Indiana Tax Court
Panel names 3 Tax Court judge finalists
October 27, 2010
Michael HoskinsWatch video highlights of finalists Joby Jerrells, Hon. Karen Love, and Martha Wentworth's interviews before the Indiana
Judicial Nominating Commission.
MoreCommission names 3 Indiana Tax Court finalists
October 27, 2010
IL StaffThe Indiana Judicial Nominating Commission has chosen Joby Jerrells, Hendricks Superior Judge Karen Love, and Martha Wentworth
as finalists for the Indiana Tax Court.
More7 semi-finalists still vying for Tax Court
October 13, 2010
Michael HoskinsSeven attorneys remain in the running to be the next Indiana Tax Court judge, and they return for second interviews before
the Indiana Judicial Nominating Commission Oct. 27.
MoreHigh court tackles use-tax issue
October 5, 2010
Elizabeth BrockettThe Supreme Court today ruled that a contribution by a parent corporation to the capital of its subsidiary is not automatically
excluded from Indiana use tax.
MoreCommission narrows Tax Court applicants
September 29, 2010
Michael HoskinsThe Indiana Tax Court logo symbolizes what will remain the same next year, even though the only person who’s ever presided
on that appellate bench will change for the first time since that court was created more than a quarter century ago.
More7 remain in running for Tax Court judge
September 27, 2010
Michael HoskinsIn less than 30 minutes, the Indiana Judicial Nominating Commission cut in half the list of applicants to become the state’s
second-ever Indiana Tax Court judge.
MoreBreaking: Commission names 7 semi-finalists
September 27, 2010
Michael HoskinsThe Indiana Judicial Nominating Commission has selected seven semi-finalists for consideration to become the next Indiana
Tax Court judge.
MoreCommission conducts first Tax Court judge interviews
September 27, 2010
Michael HoskinsThe Indiana Judicial Nominating Commission is interviewing 14 people who’ve applied to be the state’s next Tax
Court judge, narrowing down the list to semi-finalists who will return for second interviews in October.
MoreTax court applicant withdraws name from consideration
September 24, 2010
Jennifer NelsonIndiana Tax Court applicant Richard Hofmann of Noblesville has removed his name from consideration for the upcoming vacancy
on the court.
More15 apply to be next Tax Court judge
September 21, 2010
Jennifer NelsonFifteen people want to be Indiana’s next Tax Court judge. Judge Thomas G. Fisher announced in August his plans to retire
Jan. 1, 2011.
MoreFacility not predominately used for charitable purposes is taxable
September 3, 2010
Elizabeth BrockettDespite a claim that labor unions are “inherently” charitable in nature and have historically been granted property
tax exemptions, the Indiana Tax Court affirmed that one union’s banquet facility is 100 percent taxable.
MoreAppellate courts address estate tax, trust division regarding adoptions
September 1, 2010
Rebecca BerfangerAs adoptions have become more common and more accepted for expanding the family tree, courts have had to address some legal
matters clarifying those familial ties.
MoreIndiana's tax judge to retire
August 18, 2010
Michael HoskinsWhen comparing his past two jobs, Judge Thomas G. Fisher admits that he finds stories from his prosecutor days more interesting
than those in the past quarter century when he’s presided over the state’s appellate tax court.
MoreDeadline set for Tax Court judge applications
August 17, 2010
Michael HoskinsAnyone interested in being the next Indiana Tax Court judge has just about a month to apply for that position.
MoreTax Court judge to retire Jan. 1
August 12, 2010
Jennifer NelsonThe state’s first and only judge of the Indiana Tax Court, Judge Thomas G. Fisher, announced today he is stepping down
from the bench Jan. 1, 2011.
MoreIndiana Tax Court judge retiring next year
August 12, 2010
IL StaffIndiana Tax Court Judge Thomas G. Fisher is leaving the bench Jan. 1, 2011, the court announced this afternoon.
MoreTax court orders USUT refund
June 17, 2010
Jennifer NelsonThe Indiana Department of State Revenue erred in concluding that a natural gas-fired power plant in Terre Haute was subject
to the Utility Services Use Tax, ruled the Indiana Tax Court Wednesday.
MoreFees updated for appellate courts
May 12, 2010
IL StaffThe Indiana Supreme Court published an order April 26 on the fees the state's
appellate courts clerk can charge for miscellaneous services.
MoreTrial court lacks jurisdiction in tax suit
April 27, 2010
Jennifer NelsonThe Indiana Tax Court is the proper venue for a suit filed by the state to recover an erroneous tax refund, the Indiana Court
of Appeals affirmed today.
MoreTax court rules on inheritance issue
April 23, 2010
Jennifer NelsonIn Indiana, a person adopted pre-emancipation can't be considered a Class A transferee beneficiary for inheritance tax
purposes, the Indiana Tax Court ruled Thursday afternoon in an issue of first impression.
MorePractitioners say recent tax rulings help clarify precedent
April 14, 2010
Michael HoskinsWhen Indianapolis attorney Larry Stroble read two recent rulings from the Indiana Tax Court, he saw one consistent message
that speaks broadly to an overall inadequacy of the legal system.
MoreTax court relocating
April 7, 2010
Jennifer NelsonThe Indiana Tax Court is relocating, but the court won't be moving very far. It's moving two floors down in its current
building, the National City Center in Indianapolis.
MoreTax return doesn't require attached appraisal
March 25, 2010
Jennifer NelsonIndiana code doesn't require an estate to file an appraisal with its inheritance tax return, the Indiana Tax Court decided
in two opinions handed down Wednesday.
MoreJudge: Reformatted tax appeal untimely
January 5, 2010
Jennifer NelsonEven though a couple had originally filed their tax appeal within the 45-day deadline, the Indiana Tax Court still dismissed
their appeal because their reformatted documents and notice of intent to appeal weren't filed until after the deadline.
MoreTax Court sidesteps first-impression issue
December 10, 2009
Jennifer NelsonAlthough the Indiana Tax Court had the opportunity to address an issue of first impression, it decided to save its analysis
of the issue for another day because the case could be resolved on other grounds.
More
Sponsored by
on Facebook & Twitter
on Facebook & Twitter
Indiana Lawyer on Facebook
ADVERTISEMENT
-
Lawyer who emailed nude film clip to harm ex-intern suspended 3 years
-
More than half of Conour’s inventoried assets gone, feds say
-
Indianapolis law firm Stewart & Irwin closing
-
Longest-practicing female attorney in Indiana has no plans to retire
-
Criminal code and expungement bills signed by governor
-
Lawyer who emailed nude film clip to harm ex-intern suspended 3 years
-
Indianapolis law firm Stewart & Irwin closing
-
More than half of Conour’s inventoried assets gone, feds say
-
SCOTUS rules against Indiana farmer in seed patent case
-
Social media sleuths find evidence, but admissibility requires authentication
Court Calendar
-
May 24, 2013 Indiana Patient's Compensation Fund v. Judy Holcomb, Personal Representative of the Estate of Mable Louise Cochran, deceased - 5/24/13
-
May 28, 2013 The Estate of Richard A. Mayer and Spangler, Jennings & Dougherty, P.C., v. Lax, Inc., and David Lasco - 5/28/13
-
June 12, 2013 Northern Assurance Company of America v. Thomson, Inc., et al. - 6/12/13
-
June 18, 2013 State of Indiana v. Robert Owens - 6/18/13
ADVERTISEMENT
Back to TopCopyright © All Rights Reserved. Privacy Policy | Terms of Use.
Design, CMS, Hosting & Web Development :: ePublishing.
Additional Hosting & Delivery by
I highly recommend Deanna and her team of professionals that serve the legal community. Great information and many thanks for sharing.
they are pushing these cases against lawyers too far. thought-crime.
vagueness cannot challenged, so let's write all laws vaguely and throw the constitution out the window.Even if the court is operating under a particular law, if they don't it they will change it to their liking. What a joke!!!
Two convictions becomes one conviction with exactly the same sentence, only it is not clear wheter or not that sentence will be 18 months, 120 months or 138 months. Actually if the guns were in a home, whether or not they were his, he is protected under the 2nd amendment. Jurors need to learn the law and the constitution before judging others. The cour5ts need to do this as well.
With all due respect, Rick, I think you probably would be making a mistake by going to law school. The job market for attorneys is so saturated, you may well find yourself unemployed and with a lot of debt. You mention law would be a good supplement to your skills. True. But employers unfortunately don't value that. You will find that a law degree may well pigeonhole you into an attorney slot and limit career options. If you have a good job now I would hold onto that. As an attorney, you may well end up making less with the aforementioned debt.