June 23, 2010
Rebecca BerfangerThe ninth conference aimed at solo and small firm attorneys in Indiana was a success according to organizers and those who
attended, especially going by the number of law school students in attendance compared to previous years.
More
June 23, 2010
Michael HoskinsA line of litigation has been playing out in state and federal courts involving what is and isn't allowed under the Automatic
Dialing Machines Statute.
More
June 23, 2010
Michael HoskinsA federal plan to boost green technology innovation by dramatically cutting the patent processing time is drawing mixed reaction
from intellectual property attorneys in Indiana as they wonder whether the pilot program will help or hurt their clients.
More
June 23, 2010
Michael HoskinsDelivering pizzas and moving furniture isn’t what Greenwood attorney Justin Cook thought he’d be doing once he
earned a law degree.
More
June 23, 2010
Stephen BourStephen Bour purchased a new piece of office technology recently: a high-quality conference phone with impressive features.
More
June 23, 2010
Michael HoskinsDefense attorneys for the former state trooper facing a third triple-murder trial want the Indiana Supreme Court to name a
special judge because of what they say are delays from the current presiding judge.
More
June 23, 2010
Rebecca CollierThose of us on staff here at the newspaper that grew up in Indiana and were of a certain age to pay attention to the news
can likely recall when Judge Sarah Evans Barker was confirmed to the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Indiana.
More
June 23, 2010
Rebecca BerfangerShelice R. Tolbert, a partner at the Crown Point office of Kopka Pinkus Dolin & Eads, was sworn in as president of the
James C. Kimbrough Bar Association by a longtime bar association supporter and member, Indiana Supreme Court Justice Robert
D. Rucker, who has personal and professional ties to northwest Indiana.
More
June 9, 2010
Michael HoskinsAt least two attorneys are questioning how some legal publications have included articles, columns, or other types of coverage
on pending cases, and they worry that these articles may influence the judges on the cases.
More
June 9, 2010
Michael HoskinsAfter more than a decade on the Indiana Supreme Court, Justice Theodore Boehm is ready to enter the next stage of his life
and career.
More
June 9, 2010
Michael HoskinsA July 2009 law put more strength behind local prosecutors and state regulators who can now more diligently pursue
illegal animal activity of puppy mills who don't pay taxes.
More
June 9, 2010
Rebecca BerfangerThere’s an old joke in the legal profession that attorneys never retire.So the Indiana State Bar Association and Indiana
Judges and Lawyers Assistance Program have partnered to present three conferences
in late August about retirement preparation.
More
June 9, 2010
Michael HoskinsAnyone who wants to be the next Indiana Supreme Court justice has until the end of June to apply for upcoming vacancy on the
state’s highest court.
More
June 9, 2010
Rebecca BerfangerAn attorney who works for a telecommunications cooperative in Hancock County has seen many changes since he was admitted to
the Indiana Bar in June 1988.
More
June 9, 2010
Michael HoskinsA Dearborn County commissioner alleges the county’s former attorney has wrongly accused two officials of violating federal
law and has asked the Indiana Supreme Court Disciplinary Commission to launch an investigation of its soon-to-be leader who
starts in that office June 21.
More
June 9, 2010
David DreyerJudge David J. Dreyer urges the governor to appoint a Notre Dame Law School alum.
More
June 9, 2010
IL StaffIndiana Supreme Court Disciplinary Commission actions from the June 9 Indiana Lawyer.
More
June 9, 2010
Michael HoskinsThe Indiana Supreme Court has set the stage for a judicial disciplinary action against a Marion County Traffic Court judge
for his courtroom conduct on a speeding and suspended license case last year.
More
June 9, 2010
IL StaffAll four Indiana law schools had commencement ceremonies in May recognizing more than 800 graduates around the state.
More
May 26, 2010
Editorial Indiana Lawyer
Here at the newspaper, we’re big fans of the First Amendment to the United States Constitution. But we understand the
need for and exuberance some individuals feel for the Second Amendment: “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to
the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.”
More
May 26, 2010
Michael HoskinsEnvision a world in which lawyers successfully defended a client on what all parties thought was a significant legal issue,
but future attorneys couldn't use that case result to help persuade judges in their litigation.
More
May 26, 2010
Michael HoskinsA small paperweight sits on attorney Terry White’s desk in Evansville, reminding him of an organization and motto that’s
been a central part of his life since childhood.
No matter the issue he faces in the legal world or in his personal life, he knows that he can always find guidance in the
phrase close to his heart.
More
May 26, 2010
IL StaffRacers raise money for Legal Aid Centre of Eldoret.
More
May 26, 2010
IL StaffThe president of the United Nations International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia in The Hague was recently honored
in Indiana.
More
Qualified immunity, means that if you wear a badge, you are exempt from law and free to do anything you please! The courts will back badge toting individuals, because they think they are above the law as well. They think, they have judicial immunity, they do not.
Deeply, deeply concerned? I'll bet if it was the judge's money that had been swindled we'd see deep concern with actual consequences. First a Ponzi scheme, then a shell game with the assets…c'mon, hasn't Conour abused the judicial system and his clients long enough? I say enough already.
Wow, just wow.
Forcing a defendant to wear a stun belt, in court or otherwise, is a violation of american principles! It is also unconstitutional!
So, if I save $100.00 cash per week, from my $500.00 per week paycheck, for 50 years, at which time, I will have saved $260,000.00, the government can raid my home and take my money, just by saying it is drug money! Shouldn't the government, have some kind of evidence of drugs, rather, than just saying we are the government and we will take anything you own, anytime we choose? Tyranny is upon us! If you don't know your rights, you don't have any!