Disciplinary Commission
Criticism of judge results in discipline case
May 22, 2013
Dave StaffordIndianapolis attorney and blogger Paul Ogden speaks his mind, sometimes to his disadvantage, he concedes. Now he could lose
his law license because of things he wrote.
MoreDisciplinary Actions - 5/22/13
May 22, 2013
Read who's been suspended and who has resigned from the Indiana bar.
MoreJustices suspend attorney for history of ‘unethical litigation practices’
May 8, 2013
Jennifer NelsonThe Indiana Supreme Court has handed down a three-year suspension to an Indianapolis attorney whose conduct “far exceeded
zealous advocacy and included repeated abuse of the tools of the legal system.”
MoreDisciplinary actions - 5/8/13
May 8, 2013
IL StaffRead who's been suspended recently by the Indiana Supreme Court.
MoreDisciplinary Actions -4/24/13
April 24, 2013
IL StaffRead who's been suspended and who's been publicly reprimanded by the Indiana Supreme Court.
MoreSenior judge permanently banned from judicial service
April 10, 2013
IL StaffSenior Judge Lisa M. Traylor-Wolff, who faced a disciplinary action on charges she had a sexual relationship with a client,
is no longer allowed to serve as a judge, the Indiana Supreme Court ordered Tuesday.
MoreDisciplinary Actions - 4/10/13
April 10, 2013
IL StaffRead who has recently resigned from the bar.
MoreDisciplinary commission seeks suspension of former clerk’s law license
April 3, 2013
IL StaffMore than a month after former Lake County clerk Thomas R. Philpot was sentenced to serve 18 months for theft and mail fraud
convictions, the Indiana Supreme Court Disciplinary Commission has requested his law license be suspended by the Supreme Court.
MoreDisciplinary Actions - 3/27/13
March 27, 2013
IL StaffSee who's been suspended by the Indiana Supreme Court.
MoreDisciplinary Actions - 2/27/13
February 27, 2013
IBJ Staff, IL StaffRead who's been suspended and received a public reprimand.
MoreDisciplinary Actions - 2/13/13
February 13, 2013
IL StaffRead who's resigned from the Indiana bar.
MoreDisciplinary Actions -1/30/13
January 30, 2013
IL StaffRead about the latest suspensions handed down by the Indiana Supreme Court.
MoreDisciplinary Actions - 12/21/12
December 19, 2012
IL StaffRead who's been suspended by the Indiana Supreme Court.
MoreDisciplinary Commission overreached, justices agree
November 30, 2012
Dave StaffordAn Ohio attorney who argued his disciplinary case in a rare public forum before the Indiana Supreme Court prevailed as justices
said the Indiana Disciplinary Commission’s arguments failed.
MoreAttorney discipline process goes public
November 7, 2012
Dave StaffordTestimony alleges that Ohio lawyer’s race and past play a role in Indiana’s case against him for unauthorized practice of
law.
MoreDisciplinary Actions - 11/9/12
November 7, 2012
IL StaffSee who's been disciplined by the Indiana Supreme Court.
MoreWhite disciplinary proceedings stayed, suspension still in effect
November 6, 2012
Jennifer NelsonThe Indiana Supreme Court agreed Nov. 1 to hold off on proceeding with a disciplinary investigation of former Indiana Secretary
of State Charlie White after White requested a stay. His law license, which was suspended in May, remains suspended.
MoreDisciplinary Actions - 10/26/12
October 24, 2012
IL StaffSee what attorney has been held in contempt by the Supreme Court.
MoreDisciplinary Actions - 10/12/12
October 10, 2012
Read who's had his license revoked and who has been suspended by the Indiana Supreme Court.
MoreJustices revoke conditional bar admission
October 3, 2012
Jennifer NelsonThe Indiana Supreme Court has revoked Harlan L. Vondersaar’s conditional admission to the state bar because he practiced
law while suspended.
MoreSupreme Court amends disciplinary rule
September 27, 2012
IL StaffIndiana Chief Justice Brent Dickson has signed an order amending Admission and Discipline Rule 23, Section 26 on the disciplinary
commission and proceedings.
MoreJustices find attorney practicing law after resignation
September 13, 2012
Jennifer NelsonThe Indiana Supreme Court has fined Brian L. Nehrig $1,000 and extended his ban from practice after finding he committed the
unauthorized practice of law. Nehrig resigned from the bar in 2007, and he was sentenced in 2010 after pleading guilty to
mail fraud.
MoreConour's colleagues questioned behavior
September 12, 2012
Dave StaffordWilliam Conour, until recently, was one of Indiana’s most respected and powerful personal injury attorneys, his name
prominent enough to grace a law school atrium. Now he faces a federal charge that could send him to prison for much of the
rest of his life.
MoreDisciplinary Actions - 9/14/12
September 12, 2012
IL StaffRead who's been reinstated by the Indiana Supreme Court.
More
Sponsored by
on Facebook & Twitter
on Facebook & Twitter
Indiana Lawyer on Facebook
ADVERTISEMENT
-
Lawyer who emailed nude film clip to harm ex-intern suspended 3 years
-
More than half of Conour’s inventoried assets gone, feds say
-
Indianapolis law firm Stewart & Irwin closing
-
Longest-practicing female attorney in Indiana has no plans to retire
-
Criminal code and expungement bills signed by governor
-
Lawyer who emailed nude film clip to harm ex-intern suspended 3 years
-
Indianapolis law firm Stewart & Irwin closing
-
More than half of Conour’s inventoried assets gone, feds say
-
SCOTUS rules against Indiana farmer in seed patent case
-
Social media sleuths find evidence, but admissibility requires authentication
Court Calendar
-
May 24, 2013 Indiana Patient's Compensation Fund v. Judy Holcomb, Personal Representative of the Estate of Mable Louise Cochran, deceased - 5/24/13
-
May 28, 2013 The Estate of Richard A. Mayer and Spangler, Jennings & Dougherty, P.C., v. Lax, Inc., and David Lasco - 5/28/13
-
June 12, 2013 Northern Assurance Company of America v. Thomson, Inc., et al. - 6/12/13
-
June 18, 2013 State of Indiana v. Robert Owens - 6/18/13
ADVERTISEMENT
Back to TopCopyright © All Rights Reserved. Privacy Policy | Terms of Use.
Design, CMS, Hosting & Web Development :: ePublishing.
Additional Hosting & Delivery by
Judge Roger B. Cosbey is unethical and bias toward African American who seeks justice in Title VII claims. He disrespected and used his authority to attempt to intimidate me into taking an unfair settlement and when I refused he proceeded to get my case dismissed and to deny me my Constitutional and Civil Rights. He disobeying several rules of law; specifically, by ruling on summary judgment motions against the Fed. R. Civ. P., without authority of Judge William C. Lee, without consent of the attorneys, and with conspiracy to commit “fraud on the court,” as he conspired with my former attorney. He proved to me that he is bias, unethical, unfair and unfit to be reappointed. In my opinion, he should be disbarred in 2013, for committing fraud on the court, which would make him ineligible for reinstatement in 2014. See docket 3:07 cv 629 where he rules on dispositive motions, knowing magistrates are not vested with that power (especially without consent), grants the defendant an unconscionable number of extensions, accepts my former attorney request for extension for dispositive motion knowing he was working with the opposition, and unbelievably grants the defendant another extension after he requested an extension after he missed the deadline. I know another attorney filed charges against him for bias in race discrimination case(s). I know what he did in my case before he voluntarily recused himself, I just do not know how many other innocent people have been stripped of their rights because of him. I say shame on him and no more of the same.
they are pushing these cases against lawyers too far. thought-crime.
vagueness cannot challenged, so let's write all laws vaguely and throw the constitution out the window.Even if the court is operating under a particular law, if they don't it they will change it to their liking. What a joke!!!
Two convictions becomes one conviction with exactly the same sentence, only it is not clear wheter or not that sentence will be 18 months, 120 months or 138 months. Actually if the guns were in a home, whether or not they were his, he is protected under the 2nd amendment. Jurors need to learn the law and the constitution before judging others. The cour5ts need to do this as well.
With all due respect, Rick, I think you probably would be making a mistake by going to law school. The job market for attorneys is so saturated, you may well find yourself unemployed and with a lot of debt. You mention law would be a good supplement to your skills. True. But employers unfortunately don't value that. You will find that a law degree may well pigeonhole you into an attorney slot and limit career options. If you have a good job now I would hold onto that. As an attorney, you may well end up making less with the aforementioned debt.