Disciplinary Commission
Disciplinary Actions - 7/20/11
July 20, 2011
IL StaffRead who has been suspended recently by the Indiana Supreme Court.
MoreSupreme Court suspends Gary attorney
July 6, 2011
Jenny MontgomeryThe Indiana Supreme Court has suspended a Gary attorney who has been the subject of suspension or reprimand three times since
1992.
MoreHearing officer finds in Carl Brizzi's favor in disciplinary action
June 29, 2011
Michael HoskinsA hearing officer recommends that disciplinary charges be dismissed against ex-Marion County Prosecutor Carl Brizzi, and now
it’s up to the Indiana Supreme Court to consider the case.
MoreJustices bar Arizona lawyer due to advertising rule violations
May 27, 2011
Michael HoskinsOut-of-state attorneys have received a fresh warning from the Indiana Supreme Court, one that specifically reiterates that
everyone should know this state’s attorney advertising rules when promoting oneself as being “specialized”
in a particular area of law or practicing with a “national firm.”
MoreDisciplinary Actions - 5/25/11
May 25, 2011
IL StaffRead who's been suspended by the Indiana Supreme Court.
MoreJustices suspend former judge for misconduct
May 19, 2011
Michael HoskinsThe Indiana Supreme Court has suspended a northwest Indiana attorney for helping a litigant whose cases he’d presided
over more than a decade ago when he was a Jasper Superior judge.
MoreFormer Marion County spokesperson given public reprimand
May 18, 2011
IL StaffMarietto “Mario” V. Massillamany, an attorney and former spokesperson for then-Marion County Prosecutor Carl Brizzi,
has been publicly reprimanded by the Indiana Supreme Court for driving drunk.
MoreDisciplinary charges filed against Hamilton County judge
May 13, 2011
Jennifer NelsonThe Indiana Commission on Judicial Qualifications has filed disciplinary charges against Hamilton Superior Judge William Hughes.
The charges are related to the judge’s arrest for driving while impaired and later guilty plea to misdemeanor reckless
driving in North Carolina.
MoreSuspended attorney pleads guilty to theft
April 13, 2011
Michael HoskinsA suspended attorney has pleaded guilty to stealing $283,000 from his clients during dozens of transactions.
MoreNew advertising rules irk some lawyers
April 13, 2011
Michael HoskinsBloomington attorney Ken Nunn says he hasn’t been hurt by new attorney advertising rules put in place at the start of
the year, but he’s hearing more disturbing stories from people who are feeling the effects.
MoreDisciplinary Actions - 4/13/11
April 13, 2011
See who was suspended by the Indiana Supreme Court.
MoreDisciplinary Actions - 3/30/11
March 30, 2011
See who's been suspended or received a public reprimand from the Indiana Supreme Court.
MoreDisciplinary Actions - March 16, 2011
March 16, 2011
IL StaffRead about recent disciplinary actions ordered by the Indiana Supreme Court.
MoreDisciplinary Actions - 3/2/11
March 2, 2011
See who has been suspended, received a public reprimand, and who resigned.
MoreAttorney reprimanded for charging unreasonable fees
February 14, 2011
Jennifer NelsonThe Indiana Supreme Court has publicly reprimanded a Hamilton County attorney for violating Indiana Professional Conduct Rule
1.5(a) by making agreements for and charging unreasonable fees.
MoreLawyer suspended for 180 days due to conduct during disciplinary process
February 11, 2011
Michael HoskinsThe Indiana Supreme Court has ordered a six month suspension for an Indiana lawyer who primarily practices in Michigan, not
because of the misconduct committed, but more specifically because of the attorney’s bad behavior during the disciplinary
process.
MoreEx-Marion County Prosecutor Carl Brizzi defends himself in court
January 19, 2011
Michael HoskinsWhile the ex-prosecutor in the state’s largest county waits to hear whether he will get a black mark for misconduct
on his record, the Marion County disciplinary action against Carl Brizzi has broader professional conduct implications for
attorneys throughout Indiana.
MoreDisciplinary Actions - 1/19/11
January 19, 2011
See who's been suspended by the Disciplinary Commission.
MoreBrizzi disciplinary case poses 'actual prejudice' question
January 7, 2011
Michael HoskinsFormer Marion County prosecutor Carl Brizzi took the stand today, defending himself against attorney misconduct charges alleging
that he violated professional conduct rules by public statements made on pending cases.
MoreOffensive language results in disciplinary actions
January 5, 2011
Rebecca BerfangerComplaints based on a misconduct rule regarding how an attorney could offend others through prejudicial words or actions resulted
in disciplinary orders in May and December 2010.
More
Sponsored by
on Facebook & Twitter
on Facebook & Twitter
Indiana Lawyer on Facebook
ADVERTISEMENT
-
Lawyer who emailed nude film clip to harm ex-intern suspended 3 years
-
More than half of Conour’s inventoried assets gone, feds say
-
Indianapolis law firm Stewart & Irwin closing
-
Longest-practicing female attorney in Indiana has no plans to retire
-
Criminal code and expungement bills signed by governor
-
Lawyer who emailed nude film clip to harm ex-intern suspended 3 years
-
Indianapolis law firm Stewart & Irwin closing
-
More than half of Conour’s inventoried assets gone, feds say
-
SCOTUS rules against Indiana farmer in seed patent case
-
Social media sleuths find evidence, but admissibility requires authentication
Court Calendar
-
May 24, 2013 Indiana Patient's Compensation Fund v. Judy Holcomb, Personal Representative of the Estate of Mable Louise Cochran, deceased - 5/24/13
-
May 28, 2013 The Estate of Richard A. Mayer and Spangler, Jennings & Dougherty, P.C., v. Lax, Inc., and David Lasco - 5/28/13
-
June 12, 2013 Northern Assurance Company of America v. Thomson, Inc., et al. - 6/12/13
-
June 18, 2013 State of Indiana v. Robert Owens - 6/18/13
ADVERTISEMENT
Back to TopCopyright © All Rights Reserved. Privacy Policy | Terms of Use.
Design, CMS, Hosting & Web Development :: ePublishing.
Additional Hosting & Delivery by
Judge Roger B. Cosbey is unethical and bias toward African American who seeks justice in Title VII claims. He disrespected and used his authority to attempt to intimidate me into taking an unfair settlement and when I refused he proceeded to get my case dismissed and to deny me my Constitutional and Civil Rights. He disobeying several rules of law; specifically, by ruling on summary judgment motions against the Fed. R. Civ. P., without authority of Judge William C. Lee, without consent of the attorneys, and with conspiracy to commit “fraud on the court,” as he conspired with my former attorney. He proved to me that he is bias, unethical, unfair and unfit to be reappointed. In my opinion, he should be disbarred in 2013, for committing fraud on the court, which would make him ineligible for reinstatement in 2014. See docket 3:07 cv 629 where he rules on dispositive motions, knowing magistrates are not vested with that power (especially without consent), grants the defendant an unconscionable number of extensions, accepts my former attorney request for extension for dispositive motion knowing he was working with the opposition, and unbelievably grants the defendant another extension after he requested an extension after he missed the deadline. I know another attorney filed charges against him for bias in race discrimination case(s). I know what he did in my case before he voluntarily recused himself, I just do not know how many other innocent people have been stripped of their rights because of him. I say shame on him and no more of the same.
they are pushing these cases against lawyers too far. thought-crime.
vagueness cannot challenged, so let's write all laws vaguely and throw the constitution out the window.Even if the court is operating under a particular law, if they don't it they will change it to their liking. What a joke!!!
Two convictions becomes one conviction with exactly the same sentence, only it is not clear wheter or not that sentence will be 18 months, 120 months or 138 months. Actually if the guns were in a home, whether or not they were his, he is protected under the 2nd amendment. Jurors need to learn the law and the constitution before judging others. The cour5ts need to do this as well.
With all due respect, Rick, I think you probably would be making a mistake by going to law school. The job market for attorneys is so saturated, you may well find yourself unemployed and with a lot of debt. You mention law would be a good supplement to your skills. True. But employers unfortunately don't value that. You will find that a law degree may well pigeonhole you into an attorney slot and limit career options. If you have a good job now I would hold onto that. As an attorney, you may well end up making less with the aforementioned debt.