On the Move

On The Move - 3/27/13

March 27, 2013
IL Staff
Read who's joined Indiana law firms, made partner or received an award.
More

On The Move - 3/13/13

March 13, 2013
IL Staff
Read about recent employment moves and appointments of Indiana attorneys.
More

On The Move - 2/27/13

February 27, 2013
IL Staff
See who's joined Indiana firms, received promotions or opened a new law office.
More

On the Move - 2/13/13

February 13, 2013
IL Staff
Read who's joined Indiana firms and who's been promoted recently.
More

On the Move - 1/30/13

January 30, 2013
IL Staff
See who's joined Indiana firms, made partner or honored recently.
More

On the Move - 1/16/13

January 16, 2013
IL Staff
Read what attorneys have joined Indiana firms, become partner, or recently been honored.
More

ON THE MOVE - 1/2/13

January 2, 2013
Read who's joined Indiana law firms and been elected or honored recently.
More

On the Move - 12/7/12

December 5, 2012
IL Staff
Read who's joined Indiana firms, been appointed to boards and received awards.
More

On the Move - 11/9/12

November 7, 2012
IL Staff
Read who's been honored, elected, or joined a new firm.
More

On The Move- 10/12/12

October 10, 2012
See who's joined Indiana firms, won awards, or been elected officers.
More

On the Move - 9/14/12

September 12, 2012
IL Staff
Read about attorneys who have recently joined Indiana firms, been promoted or won awards.
More

On the Move - 8/3/12 - 8/16/12

August 1, 2012
IL Staff
See who's joined Indiana firms, been promoted, or received an award.
More

On the Move - 7/6/12

July 4, 2012
IL Staff
See who's joined Indiana firms, who's been honored and who's been elected to boards.
More

On The Move - 6/8/12

June 6, 2012
IL Staff
Read who's joined firms in Indiana, been honored, and become partner.
More

On the Move - 5/11/12

May 9, 2012
IL Staff
See who's been honored and joined Indiana firms.
More

On The Move - 4/13/12

April 11, 2012
IL Staff
See who's joined Indiana firms, been appointed to boards or recently honored.
More

On The Move -3/2/12

February 29, 2012
IL Staff
See who's been promoted, joined an Indiana firm, and been appointed to local boards.
More

On the Move -1/6/12

January 4, 2012
IL Staff
See who's joined Indiana firms, what awards attorneys have received and who has been promoted.
More

On The Move - 12/7/11

December 7, 2011
IL Staff
See who's joined Indiana law firms, who has opened up a new firm, and what awards attorneys have received.
More

On the Move - 11/9/11

November 9, 2011
IL Staff
Read who's joined Indiana firms, been appointed, or honored recently.
More

On the Move - 9/14/11

September 14, 2011
IL Staff
See who's been honored or elected.
More

On the Move - 8/17/11

August 17, 2011
IL Staff
See who has joined Indiana firms, who has been honored, and who has opened new locations.
More

On the Move - Aug. 3, 2011

August 3, 2011
IL Staff
Read about new hires, promotions, and honors within the Indiana legal community.
More

On the Move - 7/6/11

July 6, 2011
IL Staff
Read about movement, leadership elections, and honors bestowed in the legal community.
More

On the move - 6/8/21

June 8, 2011
IL Staff
Read news about new hires, promotions, and honors in Indiana's legal community.
More
Page  << 1 2 3 4 >> pager
Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Indiana State Bar Association

Indianapolis Bar Association

Evansville Bar Association

Allen County Bar Association

Indiana Lawyer on Facebook

facebook
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. It's a big fat black mark against the US that they radicalized a lot of these Afghan jihadis in the 80s to fight the soviets and then when they predictably got around to biting the hand that fed them, the US had to invade their homelands, install a bunch of corrupt drug kingpins and kleptocrats, take these guys and torture the hell out of them. Why for example did the US have to sodomize them? Dubya said "they hate us for our freedoms!" Here, try some of that freedom whether you like it or not!!! Now they got even more reasons to hate us-- lets just keep bombing the crap out of their populations, installing more puppet regimes, arming one faction against another, etc etc etc.... the US is becoming a monster. No wonder they hate us. Here's my modest recommendation. How about we follow "Just War" theory in the future. St Augustine had it right. How about we treat these obvious prisoners of war according to the Geneva convention instead of torturing them in sadistic and perverted ways.

  2. As usual, John is "spot-on." The subtle but poignant points he makes are numerous and warrant reflection by mediators and users. Oh but were it so simple.

  3. ACLU. Way to step up against the police state. I see a lot of things from the ACLU I don't like but this one is a gold star in its column.... instead of fighting it the authorities should apologize and back off.

  4. Duncan, It's called the RIGHT OF ASSOCIATION and in the old days people believed it did apply to contracts and employment. Then along came title vii.....that aside, I believe that I am free to work or not work for whomever I like regardless: I don't need a law to tell me I'm free. The day I really am compelled to ignore all the facts of social reality in my associations and I blithely go along with it, I'll be a slave of the state. That day is not today......... in the meantime this proposed bill would probably be violative of 18 usc sec 1981 that prohibits discrimination in contracts... a law violated regularly because who could ever really expect to enforce it along the millions of contracts made in the marketplace daily? Some of these so-called civil rights laws are unenforceable and unjust Utopian Social Engineering. Forcing people to love each other will never work.

  5. I am the father of a sweet little one-year-old named girl, who happens to have Down Syndrome. To anyone who reads this who may be considering the decision to terminate, please know that your child will absolutely light up your life as my daughter has the lives of everyone around her. There is no part of me that condones abortion of a child on the basis that he/she has or might have Down Syndrome. From an intellectual standpoint, however, I question the enforceability of this potential law. As it stands now, the bill reads in relevant part as follows: "A person may not intentionally perform or attempt to perform an abortion . . . if the person knows that the pregnant woman is seeking the abortion solely because the fetus has been diagnosed with Down syndrome or a potential diagnosis of Down syndrome." It includes similarly worded provisions abortion on "any other disability" or based on sex selection. It goes so far as to make the medical provider at least potentially liable for wrongful death. First, how does a medical provider "know" that "the pregnant woman is seeking the abortion SOLELY" because of anything? What if the woman says she just doesn't want the baby - not because of the diagnosis - she just doesn't want him/her? Further, how can the doctor be liable for wrongful death, when a Child Wrongful Death claim belongs to the parents? Is there any circumstance in which the mother's comparative fault will not exceed the doctor's alleged comparative fault, thereby barring the claim? If the State wants to discourage women from aborting their children because of a Down Syndrome diagnosis, I'm all for that. Purporting to ban it with an unenforceable law, however, is not the way to effectuate this policy.

ADVERTISEMENT