February 2, 2012
IL StaffWith construction winding down at the Birch Bayh Federal Building and United States Courthouse in Indianapolis, there are
two changes regarding bankruptcy judges’ courtrooms.
More
January 18, 2012
Michael HoskinsThe final lawsuit in a multi-district litigation case involving Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) claims against
Indiana-based Zimmer Holdings has been resolved, with U.S. Judge Sarah Evans Barker in the Southern District of Indiana dismissing
with prejudice the suit against the company on Dec. 23.
More
January 6, 2012
IL Staff
Due to scheduled maintenance, e-filing and PACER access to case information for the U.S. District Court, Southern District
of Indiana will be unavailable from 8 a.m. to 8 p.m. Jan. 7.
More
December 23, 2011
Michael HoskinsThe American Civil Liberties Union of Indiana is asking a federal judge to hold the state’s Department of Correction
in contempt for not offering inmates kosher meals as it had been ordered to do a year ago.
More
December 22, 2011
IBJ StaffA federal judge on Wednesday sentenced a former Dow AgroSciences researcher to more than seven years in prison for sending
trade secrets worth millions of dollars to China and Germany.
More
December 21, 2011
Scott OlsonFederal prosecutors are recommending that a former Dow AgroSciences researcher be sentenced to more than seven years in prison
for sending trade secrets worth millions to China and Germany.
More
December 21, 2011
IL StaffThe U.S. District Courts for the Southern and Northern Districts of Indiana will be changing the style of Local Rules beginning
Jan.1.
More
December 13, 2011
Michael HoskinsBalancing free speech rights with the public interest in preventing automated political calls from out-of-state entities,
U.S. Judge William Lawrence in Indianapolis denied the state’s request to continue enforcing Indiana’s auto-dialer
statute while a higher court is considering his ruling from two months ago that blocked enforcement.
More
December 1, 2011
IL StaffThe U.S. District Court, Southern District of Indiana, is seeking comment on proposed amendments to dozens of its local rules.
If adopted, the amendments will become effective Jan. 1, 2012.
More
November 30, 2011
IL StaffSeveral changes are coming to the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Indiana and the U.S. District
Court in the Northern District of Indiana Thursday.
More
November 30, 2011
IL StaffThe United States District Court for the Southern District of Indiana is accepting applications from attorneys interested
in serving on the court’s Criminal Justice Act panel for the Indianapolis and Terre Haute divisions.
More
November 28, 2011
Michael HoskinsWhile she said she doubts the plaintiffs can win their case, U.S. Judge Sarah Evans Barker is allowing limited class certification
in a lawsuit challenging the state’s $5 million damage liability cap. Plaintiffs incurred injuries in the Indiana State
Fair stage collapse Aug. 13.
More
November 8, 2011
Michael HoskinsIndiana saw fewer bankruptcies for the fiscal year ending Sept. 30, 2011, than it did the year before, with the state improving
its national ranking based on case filings.
More
November 8, 2011
IL StaffCivil rights in the Southern District will be the topic of the fourth annual Court History Symposium presented by the Historical
Society for the Southern District of Indiana Nov. 18.
More
November 2, 2011
IL StaffThe United States Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of Indiana has adopted revisions to Local Rule B-1009-1. The
United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Indiana has
amended its Local Rule B-3007-1.
More
October 28, 2011
Michael HoskinsTwo former college athletes who lost their scholarships because of injuries are now arguing to the 7th Circuit Court of Appeals
that they would have received multi-year athletic scholarships covering the costs of their bachelor’s degrees if it
wasn’t for the “anti-competitive” National Collegiate Athletic Association Division I bylaws.
More
October 26, 2011
Michael HoskinsWorkplace Internet policies go up against free speech concerns.
More
October 18, 2011
IL StaffA Chinese national and former employee of Dow AgroSciences LLC pleaded guilty Tuesday to economic espionage and theft of trade
secrets in federal court. Kexue Huang’s case is the first prosecution in Indiana for foreign economic espionage.
More
October 5, 2011
Jennifer NelsonThe Indiana Supreme Court has accepted three certified questions stemming from a case in the Southern District of Indiana.
More
September 28, 2011
Michael HoskinsThe state is not able to prevent out-of-state entities from placing political calls to residents within Indiana because of
an existing federal law, according to a federal judge’s ruling on Indiana’s auto-dialer statute.
More
September 28, 2011
Michael HoskinsRuling strikes down one Indiana bar exam application question.
More
September 27, 2011
Michael HoskinsThe Indiana Supreme Court’s Board of Law Examiners is cutting one controversial question from its annual bar exam application
and will revise another in order to comply with a federal judge’s recent ruling.
More
September 21, 2011
Michael HoskinsA federal judge has found that one of the Indiana bar exam application questions violates the Americans with Disabilities
Act because it infringes on potential lawyers’ privacy rights.
More
September 15, 2011
Michael HoskinsAn Indianapolis federal judge has reversed the temporary restraining order she issued two months ago that stopped the state
from cutting fees it pays to pharmacists for dispensing Medicaid prescriptions.
More
September 14, 2011
U.S. Magistrate Denise K. LaRue was sworn in Sept. 8 as the Southern District of Indiana's newest magistrate.
More
Qualified immunity, means that if you wear a badge, you are exempt from law and free to do anything you please! The courts will back badge toting individuals, because they think they are above the law as well. They think, they have judicial immunity, they do not.
Deeply, deeply concerned? I'll bet if it was the judge's money that had been swindled we'd see deep concern with actual consequences. First a Ponzi scheme, then a shell game with the assets…c'mon, hasn't Conour abused the judicial system and his clients long enough? I say enough already.
Wow, just wow.
Forcing a defendant to wear a stun belt, in court or otherwise, is a violation of american principles! It is also unconstitutional!
So, if I save $100.00 cash per week, from my $500.00 per week paycheck, for 50 years, at which time, I will have saved $260,000.00, the government can raid my home and take my money, just by saying it is drug money! Shouldn't the government, have some kind of evidence of drugs, rather, than just saying we are the government and we will take anything you own, anytime we choose? Tyranny is upon us! If you don't know your rights, you don't have any!