Juvenile case
Teen's Fourth Amendment rights not violated
March 9, 2009
Jennifer NelsonDebating in a footnote whether a juvenile's argument that his Fourth Amendment rights were violated was subject to a Terry
stop analysis, the Indiana Court of Appeals decided to apply the Terry analysis to his case.
MoreCourt: Rehabilitation evaluation a must
December 17, 2008
Michael HoskinsThe Indiana Supreme Court says that before any juvenile can be placed on the state's sex offender registry, a trial court
must first evaluate whether that minor has been rehabilitated to determine if there's clear and convincing evidence he
or she might re-offend.
MoreTermination rash in special needs CHINS case
December 11, 2008
Jennifer NelsonThe Indiana Court of Appeals reversed the termination of a mother's parental rights to her special needs son, finding
the decision would create a "sobering message" to parents of children who need ongoing assistance.
MoreTermination of rights affirmed despite error
December 2, 2008
Jennifer NelsonA trial court erred when it failed to follow Indiana Code in a termination of parental rights hearing, the Indiana Court of
Appeals ruled today. Because the appellate court found the error to be harmless, it affirmed the involuntary termination of
a father's parental rights.
MoreStatute must be followed in all CHINS cases
November 18, 2008
Jennifer NelsonThe Indiana Court of Appeals today affirmed the involuntary termination of parental rights of a mother and father, but cautioned
the Marion County Department of Child Services to continue to follow the statutory procedures in child in need of services
cases and termination cases even if a court determines reunification efforts aren't required.
MoreAdjudications don't violate double jeopardy
November 15, 2008
Jennifer NelsonThe Indiana Court of Appeals affirmed that double jeopardy violations can be applicable to juveniles, but denied reversing
a girl's adjudications because there were no violations in her case.
MoreCourt rules on media access to CHINS cases
October 21, 2008
Jennifer NelsonFor the second time this month, the Indiana Court of Appeals has ruled on media access of CHINS records in a high-profile
case involving the death of a child.
MoreSupreme Court grants 2 transfers
September 5, 2008
Jennifer NelsonThe Indiana Supreme Court granted two transfers Sept. 4, including one involving whether a juvenile court can order probation
after a juvenile is ordered to commitment in the Department of Correction.
MoreCounties must pay for juvenile facilities
June 13, 2008
Jennifer NelsonIndiana counties are responsible to pay a portion of costs to operate juvenile detention facilities.
More
Sponsored by
on Facebook & Twitter
on Facebook & Twitter
Indiana Lawyer on Facebook
ADVERTISEMENT
-
Lawyer who emailed nude film clip to harm ex-intern suspended 3 years
-
More than half of Conour’s inventoried assets gone, feds say
-
Indianapolis law firm Stewart & Irwin closing
-
Longest-practicing female attorney in Indiana has no plans to retire
-
Criminal code and expungement bills signed by governor
-
Lawyer who emailed nude film clip to harm ex-intern suspended 3 years
-
Indianapolis law firm Stewart & Irwin closing
-
More than half of Conour’s inventoried assets gone, feds say
-
SCOTUS rules against Indiana farmer in seed patent case
-
Social media sleuths find evidence, but admissibility requires authentication
Court Calendar
-
May 24, 2013 Indiana Patient's Compensation Fund v. Judy Holcomb, Personal Representative of the Estate of Mable Louise Cochran, deceased - 5/24/13
-
May 28, 2013 The Estate of Richard A. Mayer and Spangler, Jennings & Dougherty, P.C., v. Lax, Inc., and David Lasco - 5/28/13
-
June 12, 2013 Northern Assurance Company of America v. Thomson, Inc., et al. - 6/12/13
-
June 18, 2013 State of Indiana v. Robert Owens - 6/18/13
ADVERTISEMENT
Back to TopCopyright © All Rights Reserved. Privacy Policy | Terms of Use.
Design, CMS, Hosting & Web Development :: ePublishing.
Additional Hosting & Delivery by
Judge Roger B. Cosbey is unethical and bias toward African American who seeks justice in Title VII claims. He disrespected and used his authority to attempt to intimidate me into taking an unfair settlement and when I refused he proceeded to get my case dismissed and to deny me my Constitutional and Civil Rights. He disobeying several rules of law; specifically, by ruling on summary judgment motions against the Fed. R. Civ. P., without authority of Judge William C. Lee, without consent of the attorneys, and with conspiracy to commit “fraud on the court,” as he conspired with my former attorney. He proved to me that he is bias, unethical, unfair and unfit to be reappointed. In my opinion, he should be disbarred in 2013, for committing fraud on the court, which would make him ineligible for reinstatement in 2014. See docket 3:07 cv 629 where he rules on dispositive motions, knowing magistrates are not vested with that power (especially without consent), grants the defendant an unconscionable number of extensions, accepts my former attorney request for extension for dispositive motion knowing he was working with the opposition, and unbelievably grants the defendant another extension after he requested an extension after he missed the deadline. I know another attorney filed charges against him for bias in race discrimination case(s). I know what he did in my case before he voluntarily recused himself, I just do not know how many other innocent people have been stripped of their rights because of him. I say shame on him and no more of the same.
they are pushing these cases against lawyers too far. thought-crime.
vagueness cannot challenged, so let's write all laws vaguely and throw the constitution out the window.Even if the court is operating under a particular law, if they don't it they will change it to their liking. What a joke!!!
Two convictions becomes one conviction with exactly the same sentence, only it is not clear wheter or not that sentence will be 18 months, 120 months or 138 months. Actually if the guns were in a home, whether or not they were his, he is protected under the 2nd amendment. Jurors need to learn the law and the constitution before judging others. The cour5ts need to do this as well.
With all due respect, Rick, I think you probably would be making a mistake by going to law school. The job market for attorneys is so saturated, you may well find yourself unemployed and with a lot of debt. You mention law would be a good supplement to your skills. True. But employers unfortunately don't value that. You will find that a law degree may well pigeonhole you into an attorney slot and limit career options. If you have a good job now I would hold onto that. As an attorney, you may well end up making less with the aforementioned debt.