Court vacancies
Interviews for next justice under way today
July 6, 2010
Michael HoskinsOne by one, attorneys are appearing before the seven-member Indiana Judicial Nominating Commission to explain why they should
be the next Indiana Supreme Court justice.
MoreHigh court opening process wasn't public 25 years ago
July 2, 2010
Michael HoskinsThe nearly three-dozen attorneys who’ve applied to become the state’s newest justice sets a record for the past
25 years, but it falls short of the number who’d applied for an Indiana Supreme Court post a quarter century ago.
More34 apply to become next Indiana justice
July 1, 2010
Jennifer NelsonThere are a lot of people in Indiana who want to become the state’s next Supreme Court Justice.
MoreEyeing new magistrate openings
June 23, 2010
Michael HoskinsWithin a year, the federal court system that covers the southern half of Indiana could have two new full-time magistrates,
one being a newly created position that would be the first creation of its kind in almost three decades.
MoreSchedule set to fill upcoming Indiana Supreme Court vacancy
June 9, 2010
Michael HoskinsAnyone who wants to be the next Indiana Supreme Court justice has until the end of June to apply for upcoming vacancy on the
state’s highest court.
MoreIndiana Justice Boehm stepping down after 14 years
June 9, 2010
Michael HoskinsAfter more than a decade on the Indiana Supreme Court, Justice Theodore Boehm is ready to enter the next stage of his life
and career.
MoreU.S. Senate debating Indiana judge's nomination
November 17, 2009
Michael HoskinsIndiana is at the heart of a legislative discussion about the future of the federal judiciary, and debate about a judge's
controversial nomination is coming to a head this week.
MoreSenators still stalling judge's Circuit nomination
November 10, 2009
Michael HoskinsAn Indianapolis judge's potential elevation to the federal appeals bench remains controversial even as the full U.S. Senate
inches closer to voting on his nomination in the next week.
MoreBREAKING: U.S. Senate committee OKs judicial nomination
June 4, 2009
Michael HoskinsThe Senate Judiciary Committee has just voted in favor of U.S. District Judge David F. Hamilton's nomination to the 7th
Circuit Court of Appeals.
MoreIndianapolis judge's nomination vote set
May 15, 2009
Michael HoskinsThe Senate Judiciary Committee plans to vote next week on U.S. Judge David Hamilton's nomination for the 7th Court of
Appeals.
MoreGov. appoints Madison Superior judge
May 15, 2009
IL StaffAttorney David A. Happe is the new judge of Madison Superior Court IV.
MoreRare second hearing set for judge's nomination
April 22, 2009
Michael HoskinsIn an unusual move, the Senate Judiciary Committee will hold a second judicial nomination hearing next week for U.S. District
Judge David F. Hamilton, who's being considered for a seat on the 7th Circuit Court of Appeals.
MoreFederal judicial nomination hearing draws crowd
April 2, 2009
Michael HoskinsThe Senate Judiciary Committee considered U.S. District Judge David F. Hamilton's nomination for the 7th Circuit Court
of Appeals at a Wednesday afternoon hearing.
MoreSenate Judiciary holds nomination hearing
April 1, 2009
Michael HoskinsA busy Congressional calendar has caused the U.S. Senate Judiciary Committee to move its nomination hearing to a room without
cameras, which leaves Indiana's legal community in the dark about an Indianapolis-based federal judge's nomination
for the 7th Circuit Court of Appeals.
MoreJudge Hamilton nominated for 7th Circuit
March 17, 2009
Michael HoskinsAn Indianapolis federal judge could be the next to take a spot on the 7th Circuit Court of Appeals.
More
Sponsored by
on Facebook & Twitter
on Facebook & Twitter
Indiana Lawyer on Facebook
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Back to TopCopyright © All Rights Reserved. Privacy Policy | Terms of Use.
Design, CMS, Hosting & Web Development :: ePublishing.
Additional Hosting & Delivery by
Qualified immunity, means that if you wear a badge, you are exempt from law and free to do anything you please! The courts will back badge toting individuals, because they think they are above the law as well. They think, they have judicial immunity, they do not.
Deeply, deeply concerned? I'll bet if it was the judge's money that had been swindled we'd see deep concern with actual consequences. First a Ponzi scheme, then a shell game with the assets…c'mon, hasn't Conour abused the judicial system and his clients long enough? I say enough already.
Wow, just wow.
Forcing a defendant to wear a stun belt, in court or otherwise, is a violation of american principles! It is also unconstitutional!
So, if I save $100.00 cash per week, from my $500.00 per week paycheck, for 50 years, at which time, I will have saved $260,000.00, the government can raid my home and take my money, just by saying it is drug money! Shouldn't the government, have some kind of evidence of drugs, rather, than just saying we are the government and we will take anything you own, anytime we choose? Tyranny is upon us! If you don't know your rights, you don't have any!