Leadership in Law

Leadership in Law 2014: Hon. Timothy W. Oakes

April 23, 2014
More

Leadership in Law 2014: Angela G. Garcia

April 23, 2014
IL StaffMore

Leadership in Law 2014: Henry J. Price

April 23, 2014
IL StaffMore

Leadership in Law 2014: Fran Quigley

April 23, 2014
IL StaffMore

Leadership in Law 2014: John Z. Huang

April 23, 2014
IL StaffMore

Leadership in Law 2014: John C. Render

April 23, 2014
IL StaffMore

Leadership in Law 2014: Alexander J. Limontes

April 23, 2014
IL StaffMore

Leadership in Law 2014: Sue A. Shadley

April 23, 2014
IL StaffMore

Leadership in Law 2014: Richard E. Shevitz

April 23, 2014
IL StaffMore

Leadership in Law 2014: James A. Strain

April 23, 2014
IL StaffMore

Leadership in Law 2014: David L. Swider

April 23, 2014
IL StaffMore

Leadership in Law 2014: Rubin Pusha III

April 23, 2014
IL StaffMore

Leadership in Law 2014: Brianna J. Schroeder

April 23, 2014
IL StaffMore

Leadership in Law 2014: Clifford R. Whitehead

April 23, 2014
IL StaffMore

Leadership in Law 2014: Crystal Spivey Wildeman

April 23, 2014
IL StaffMore

Leadership in Law 2013: Eric D. Schmadeke

April 24, 2013
IL StaffMore

Leadership in Law 2013: Hon. Lloyd Mark Bailey

April 24, 2013
IL StaffMore

Leadership in Law 2013: William Bock III

April 24, 2013
IL StaffMore

Leadership in Law 2013: David J. Cutshaw

April 24, 2013
IL StaffMore

Leadership in Law 2013: Michael F. Drewry

April 24, 2013
IL StaffMore

Leadership in Law 2013: Ronald E. Elberger

April 24, 2013
IL StaffMore

Leadership in Law 2013: Joseph R. Fullenkamp

April 24, 2013
IL StaffMore

Leadership in Law 2013: Hon. Calvin D. Hawkins

April 24, 2013
IL StaffMore

Leadership in Law 2013: James D. Johnson

April 24, 2013
IL StaffMore

Leadership in Law 2013: Kevin P. McGoff

April 24, 2013
IL StaffMore
Page  << 1 2 3 4 5 6 >> pager
Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. This sure is not what most who value good governance consider the Rule of Law to entail: "In a letter dated March 2, which Brizzi forwarded to IBJ, the commission dismissed the grievance “on grounds that there is not reasonable cause to believe that you are guilty of misconduct.”" Yet two month later reasonable cause does exist? (Or is the commission forging ahead, the need for reasonable belief be damned? -- A seeming violation of the Rules of Profession Ethics on the part of the commission) Could the rule of law theory cause one to believe that an explanation is in order? Could it be that Hoosier attorneys live under Imperial Law (which is also a t-word that rhymes with infamy) in which the Platonic guardians can do no wrong and never owe the plebeian class any explanation for their powerful actions. (Might makes it right?) Could this be a case of politics directing the commission, as celebrated IU Mauer Professor (the late) Patrick Baude warned was happening 20 years ago in his controversial (whisteblowing) ethics lecture on a quite similar topic: http://www.repository.law.indiana.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1498&context=ilj

  2. I have a case presently pending cert review before the SCOTUS that reveals just how Indiana regulates the bar. I have been denied licensure for life for holding the wrong views and questioning the grand inquisitors as to their duties as to state and federal constitutional due process. True story: https://www.scribd.com/doc/299040839/2016Petitionforcert-to-SCOTUS Shorter, Amici brief serving to frame issue as misuse of govt licensure: https://www.scribd.com/doc/312841269/Thomas-More-Society-Amicus-Brown-v-Ind-Bd-of-Law-Examiners

  3. Here's an idea...how about we MORE heavily regulate the law schools to reduce the surplus of graduates, driving starting salaries up for those new grads, so that we can all pay our insane amount of student loans off in a reasonable amount of time and then be able to afford to do pro bono & low-fee work? I've got friends in other industries, radiology for example, and their schools accept a very limited number of students so there will never be a glut of new grads and everyone's pay stays high. For example, my radiologist friend's school accepted just six new students per year.

  4. I totally agree with John Smith.

  5. An idea that would harm the public good which is protected by licensing. Might as well abolish doctor and health care professions licensing too. Ridiculous. Unrealistic. Would open the floodgates of mischief and abuse. Even veteranarians are licensed. How has deregulation served the public good in banking, for example? Enough ideology already!

ADVERTISEMENT