Leadership in Law 2014

Leadership in Law 2014: Darren A. Craig

April 23, 2014
IL StaffMore

Leadership in Law 2014: Lesley A. Pfleging

April 23, 2014
IL StaffMore

Leadership in Law 2014: Phillip L. Bayt

April 23, 2014
IL StaffMore

Leadership in Law 2014: Shokrina Beering

April 23, 2014
IL StaffMore

Leadership in Law 2014: Joseph T. Bumbleburg

April 23, 2014
IL StaffMore

Leadership in Law 2014: Carly A. Brandenburg

April 23, 2014
IL StaffMore

Leadership in Law 2014: Kiamesha Colom

April 23, 2014
IL StaffMore

Leadership in Law 2014: Jonathan Scott Enright

April 23, 2014
IL StaffMore

Leadership in Law 2014: Jessica Benson Cox

April 23, 2014
IL StaffMore

Leadership in Law 2014: Hon. Frances C. Gull

April 23, 2014
IL StaffMore

Leadership in Law 2014: Alan A. Levin

April 23, 2014
IL StaffMore

Leadership in Law 2014: Samantha E. DeWester

April 23, 2014
IL StaffMore

Leadership in Law 2014: Kelly A. Doria

April 23, 2014
IL StaffMore

Leadership in Law 2014: Constance R. Lindman

April 23, 2014
IL StaffMore

Leadership in Law 2014: Scott Evernham

April 23, 2014
IL StaffMore

Leadership in Law 2014: Hon. Timothy W. Oakes

April 23, 2014
More

Leadership in Law 2014: Angela G. Garcia

April 23, 2014
IL StaffMore

Leadership in Law 2014: Henry J. Price

April 23, 2014
IL StaffMore

Leadership in Law 2014: Fran Quigley

April 23, 2014
IL StaffMore

Leadership in Law 2014: John Z. Huang

April 23, 2014
IL StaffMore

Leadership in Law 2014: John C. Render

April 23, 2014
IL StaffMore

Leadership in Law 2014: Alexander J. Limontes

April 23, 2014
IL StaffMore

Leadership in Law 2014: Sue A. Shadley

April 23, 2014
IL StaffMore

Leadership in Law 2014: Richard E. Shevitz

April 23, 2014
IL StaffMore

Leadership in Law 2014: James A. Strain

April 23, 2014
IL StaffMore
Page  1 2 >> pager
Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. Major social engineering imposed by judicial order well in advance of democratic change, has been the story of the whole post ww2 period. Contraception, desegregation, abortion, gay marriage: all rammed down the throats of Americans who didn't vote to change existing laws on any such thing, by the unelected lifetime tenure Supreme court heirarchs. Maybe people came to accept those things once imposed upon them, but, that's accommodation not acceptance; and surely not democracy. So let's quit lying to the kids telling them this is a democracy. Some sort of oligarchy, but no democracy that's for sure, and it never was. A bourgeois republic from day one.

  2. JD Massur, yes, brings to mind a similar stand at a Texas Mission in 1836. Or Vladivostok in 1918. As you seemingly gloat, to the victors go the spoils ... let the looting begin, right?

  3. I always wondered why high fence deer hunting was frowned upon? I guess you need to keep the population steady. If you don't, no one can enjoy hunting! Thanks for the post! Fence

  4. Whether you support "gay marriage" or not is not the issue. The issue is whether the SCOTUS can extract from an unmentionable somewhere the notion that the Constitution forbids government "interference" in the "right" to marry. Just imagine time-traveling to Philadelphia in 1787. Ask James Madison if the document he and his fellows just wrote allowed him- or forbade government to "interfere" with- his "right" to marry George Washington? He would have immediately- and justly- summoned the Sergeant-at-Arms to throw your sorry self out into the street. Far from being a day of liberation, this is a day of capitulation by the Rule of Law to the Rule of What's Happening Now.

  5. With today's ruling, AG Zoeller's arguments in the cases of Obamacare and Same-sex Marriage can be relegated to the ash heap of history. 0-fer

ADVERTISEMENT