Disciplinary Actions

Disciplinary actions - Sept. 25, 2013

September 25, 2013
Read disciplinary actions issued by the Indiana Supreme Court in recent weeks.
More

Disciplinary Actions 8/28/13

August 28, 2013
IBJ Staff
Read who has recently been suspended by the Indiana Supreme Court, received a public reprimand or resigned.
More

Disciplinary Action - 8/14/2013

August 14, 2013
IL Staff
Read who has recently been suspended by the Indiana Supreme Court, received a public reprimand or resigned.
More

Disciplinary Actions - 7/31/13

July 31, 2013
IL Staff
Read who's recently been suspended by the Indiana Supreme Court, received a public reprimand or resigned.
More

Disciplinary Actions - 7/17/13

July 17, 2013
IL Staff
Read who's recently been suspended by the Indiana Supreme Court, received a public reprimand or resigned.
More

Disciplinary Actions - 7/3/13

July 3, 2013
IL Staff
See who's been suspended or resigned from the Indiana bar.
More

Disciplinary Actions - 6/19/13

June 19, 2013
IL Staff
Read who's recently been suspended by the Indiana Supreme Court.
More

Disciplinary Actions - 6/5/13

June 5, 2013
IL Staff
Read who's been suspended recently by the Indiana Supreme Court.
More

Disciplinary Actions - 5/22/13

May 22, 2013
Read who's been suspended and who has resigned from the Indiana bar.
More

Disciplinary actions - 5/8/13

May 8, 2013
IL Staff
Read who's been suspended recently by the Indiana Supreme Court.
More

Disciplinary Actions -4/24/13

April 24, 2013
IL Staff
Read who's been suspended and who's been publicly reprimanded by the Indiana Supreme Court.
More

Disciplinary Actions - 4/10/13

April 10, 2013
IL Staff
Read who has recently resigned from the bar.
More

Disciplinary Actions - 3/27/13

March 27, 2013
IL Staff
See who's been suspended by the Indiana Supreme Court.
More

Disciplinary Actions - 2/27/13

February 27, 2013
IBJ Staff, IL Staff
Read who's been suspended and received a public reprimand.
More

Disciplinary Actions - 2/13/13

February 13, 2013
IL Staff
Read who's resigned from the Indiana bar.
More

Disciplinary Actions -1/30/13

January 30, 2013
IL Staff
Read about the latest suspensions handed down by the Indiana Supreme Court.
More

Disciplinary Actions - 1/16/13

January 16, 2013
IL Staff
See who's discipline has been rescinded.
More

Disciplinary Actions - 12/21/12

December 19, 2012
IL Staff
Read who's been suspended by the Indiana Supreme Court.
More

Disciplinary Actions - 11/23/12

November 21, 2012
IL Staff
Read who's been suspended and who has had his proceeding stayed.
More

Disciplinary Actions - 11/9/12

November 7, 2012
IL Staff
See who's been disciplined by the Indiana Supreme Court.
More

Disciplinary Actions - 10/26/12

October 24, 2012
IL Staff
See what attorney has been held in contempt by the Supreme Court.
More

Disciplinary Actions - 10/12/12

October 10, 2012
Read who's had his license revoked and who has been suspended by the Indiana Supreme Court.
More

Disciplinary Actions - 9/28/12

September 26, 2012
IL Staff
Read who has been suspended, reprimanded, held in contempt or reinstated by the Indiana Supreme Court.
More

Disciplinary Actions - 9/14/12

September 12, 2012
IL Staff
Read who's been reinstated by the Indiana Supreme Court.
More

Disciplinary Actions - Aug. 31, 2012

August 29, 2012
IL Staff
Read who has resigned and who was suspended.
More
Page  << 1 2 3 4 5 >> pager
Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Indiana State Bar Association

Indianapolis Bar Association

Evansville Bar Association

Allen County Bar Association

Indiana Lawyer on Facebook

facebook
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. in a lawyer discipline case Judge Brown, now removed, was presiding over a hearing about a lawyer accused of the supposedly heinous ethical violation of saying the words "Illegal immigrant." (IN re Barker) http://www.in.gov/judiciary/files/order-discipline-2013-55S00-1008-DI-429.pdf .... I wonder if when we compare the egregious violations of due process by Judge Brown, to her chiding of another lawyer for politically incorrectness, if there are any conclusions to be drawn about what kind of person, what kind of judge, what kind of apparatchik, is busy implementing the agenda of political correctness and making off-limits legit advocacy about an adverse party in a suit whose illegal alien status is relevant? I am just asking the question, the reader can make own conclsuion. Oh wait-- did I use the wrong adjective-- let me rephrase that, um undocumented alien?

  2. of course the bigger questions of whether or not the people want to pay for ANY bussing is off limits, due to the Supreme Court protecting the people from DEMOCRACY. Several decades hence from desegregation and bussing plans and we STILL need to be taking all this taxpayer money to combat mostly-imagined "discrimination" in the most obviously failed social program of the postwar period.

  3. You can put your photos anywhere you like... When someone steals it they know it doesn't belong to them. And, a man getting a divorce is automatically not a nice guy...? That's ridiculous. Since when is need of money a conflict of interest? That would mean that no one should have a job unless they are already financially solvent without a job... A photographer is also under no obligation to use a watermark (again, people know when a photo doesn't belong to them) or provide contact information. Hey, he didn't make it easy for me to pay him so I'll just take it! Well heck, might as well walk out of the grocery store with a cart full of food because the lines are too long and you don't find that convenient. "Only in Indiana." Oh, now you're passing judgement on an entire state... What state do you live in? I need to characterize everyone in your state as ignorant and opinionated. And the final bit of ignorance; assuming a photo anyone would want is lucky and then how much does your camera have to cost to make it a good photo, in your obviously relevant opinion?

  4. Seventh Circuit Court Judge Diane Wood has stated in “The Rule of Law in Times of Stress” (2003), “that neither laws nor the procedures used to create or implement them should be secret; and . . . the laws must not be arbitrary.” According to the American Bar Association, Wood’s quote drives home this point: The rule of law also requires that people can expect predictable results from the legal system; this is what Judge Wood implies when she says that “the laws must not be arbitrary.” Predictable results mean that people who act in the same way can expect the law to treat them in the same way. If similar actions do not produce similar legal outcomes, people cannot use the law to guide their actions, and a “rule of law” does not exist.

  5. Linda, I sure hope you are not seeking a law license, for such eighteenth century sentiments could result in your denial in some jurisdictions minting attorneys for our tolerant and inclusive profession.

ADVERTISEMENT