ILNews

Knowing when the time is right

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Knowing when to begin mediation can play a significant role in the success – or failure – of negotiations. And understanding when cases are ripe for negotiation comes with experience. South Bend mediator and arbitrator Joseph Simeri said no formula exists for determining when to mediate a case.

“This stuff is really not a science, it’s an art. I can’t tell you what I do or how I do it. I don’t have a perceived game plan, I just try to get a feel for people, and how they feel for me,” he said.

Who, when and why

The type of case plays a role in finding the right time frame for mediation. For example, while employment matters may be settled quickly, in personal injury cases, early mediation may not be appropriate if all the facts are unknown.

Indianapolis attorney and mediator Denise Page, with The Mediation Group, mediates primarily personal injury and wrongful death cases.

“What I see makes a mediation blow up and not settle when it’s too early is that all the relevant medical records haven’t been given to the other side. If the medical causation or the damages – loss of income, loss of inventory in a fire loss – if it’s not documented to the satisfaction of the other party, it’s too early,” she said.

Conversely, resentment and frustration can build over time. When parties wait too long to attempt mediation, they may become less likely to cooperate.

“It’s harder to let go of the notion and maybe entertain they’re not totally right,” Page said.

Anderson solo attorney and family law mediator Marianne Woolbert said that while she has never had a case in which she believes parties attempted to mediate too early, she thinks that in divorce, mediation may be ineffective in reaching an agreement if the value of the couple’s belongings hasn’t been assessed. Otherwise, she said, early mediation works well.

“I’ve had people come to see me that want to try to avoid divorce even before they filed and basically want to mediate their lives,” Woolbert said.

Simeri handles a wide range of cases, and he said early mediation is particularly effective in employment matters, often because a worker who has a complaint about an employer has no legal remedy.

“A lot of times, the employee’s maybe just looking for a good reference, or for the employer to not argue with severance pay,” he said.

Simeri said the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission’s internal mediation program, RESOLVE, has been particularly successful in keeping employee complaints from ending up in litigation. Its external program appears to be effective as well – in 2010, the EEOC’s external mediation program reached a resolution in 73.4 percent of cases.

At early stages, Simeri said, neither the employer nor employee has invested a lot of money and time into defending against or pursuing a complaint, and that makes resolution more likely.

Recognizing the right time

You won’t find a “fundamentals of good timing” course in law school, so experience is the key to knowing when to mediate.

“I didn’t learn any of it in school,” Page said. “Each case is different, too. There may be one case that is perfect for settling early, and then there may be a case where there are so many issues that are going to have to be researched, documented, given over to the experts – you know that case is going to be pending for a couple of years.”

Mediators can help their clients recognize when the time is right, too.

Page said some clients may not realize just how long they may have to wait for a case to go to court. Once they’re aware that they may have to wait up to two years for a court date, they may be more inclined to work out an agreement in mediation.

Early on, when a plaintiff’s attorney working on a contingency fee hasn’t invested extensive work in a case, a settlement will generally allow the plaintiff to recover more money.

“If a party is paying their attorney by the hour, when it’s in the early stages, you can point out to them, ‘You’re going to be spending a lot of money on this case,’” Page said.

Setting the pace

Page said that while she tries to keep the process moving, she also recognizes the importance of letting the parties work out their differences at their own speed.

“There are times when somebody tells me, ‘You’re going too fast,’ so in that case, I slow it down,” she said. “Sometimes it takes the passage of time for people to cool off a little bit – there’s something about that going back-and-forth process that really works.”

Woolbert said that generally, she can discern right away whether the parties aren’t going to come to an agreement. But with experience, she’s also learned that maybe one mediation session just isn’t enough time, and that they may need to meet again another day.

“Once you get into the process, you kind of get a feel – it’ll happen as quickly as the parties want it to happen,” Woolbert said.•
 

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in Indiana Lawyer editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. Some are above the law in Indiana. Some lined up with Lodges have controlled power in the state since the 1920s when the Klan ruled Indiana. Consider the comments at this post and note the international h.q. in Indianapolis. http://www.theindianalawyer.com/human-trafficking-rising-in-indiana/PARAMS/article/42468. Brave journalists need to take this child torturing, above the law and antimarriage cult on just like The Globe courageously took on Cardinal Law. Are there any brave Hoosier journalists?

  2. I am nearing 66 years old..... I have no interest in contacting anyone. All I need to have is a nationality....a REAL Birthday...... the place U was born...... my soul will never be at peace. I have lived my life without identity.... if anyone can help me please contact me.

  3. This is the dissent discussed in the comment below. See comments on that story for an amazing discussion of likely judicial corruption of some kind, the rejection of the rule of law at the very least. http://www.theindianalawyer.com/justices-deny-transfer-to-child-custody-case/PARAMS/article/42774#comment

  4. That means much to me, thank you. My own communion, to which I came in my 30's from a protestant evangelical background, refuses to so affirm me, the Bishop's courtiers all saying, when it matters, that they defer to the state, and trust that the state would not be wrong as to me. (LIttle did I know that is the most common modernist catholic position on the state -- at least when the state acts consistent with the philosophy of the democrat party). I asked my RCC pastor to stand with me before the Examiners after they demanded that I disavow God's law on the record .... he refused, saying the Bishop would not allow it. I filed all of my file in the open in federal court so the Bishop's men could see what had been done ... they refused to look. (But the 7th Cir and federal judge Theresa Springmann gave me the honor of admission after so reading, even though ISC had denied me, rendering me a very rare bird). Such affirmation from a fellow believer as you have done here has been rare for me, and that dearth of solidarity, and the economic pain visited upon my wife and five children, have been the hardest part of the struggle. They did indeed banish me, for life, and so, in substance did the the Diocese, which treated me like a pariah, but thanks to this ezine ... and this is simply amazing to me .... because of this ezine I am not silenced. This ezine allowing us to speak to the corruption that the former chief "justice" left behind, yet embedded in his systems when he retired ... the openness to discuss that corruption (like that revealed in the recent whistleblowing dissent by courageous Justice David and fresh breath of air Chief Justice Rush,) is a great example of the First Amendment at work. I will not be silenced as long as this tree falling in the wood can be heard. The Hoosier Judiciary has deep seated problems, generational corruption, ideological corruption. Many cases demonstrate this. It must be spotlighted. The corrupted system has no hold on me now, none. I have survived their best shots. It is now my time to not be silent. To the Glory of God, and for the good of man's law. (It almost always works that way as to the true law, as I explained the bar examiners -- who refused to follow even their own statutory law and violated core organic law when banishing me for life -- actually revealing themselves to be lawless.)

  5. to answer your questions, you would still be practicing law and its very sad because we need lawyers like you to stand up for the little guy who have no voice. You probably were a threat to them and they didnt know how to handle the truth and did not want anyone to "rock the boat" so instead of allowing you to keep praticing they banished you, silenced you , the cowards that they are.

ADVERTISEMENT