ILNews

Knowing when the time is right

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Knowing when to begin mediation can play a significant role in the success – or failure – of negotiations. And understanding when cases are ripe for negotiation comes with experience. South Bend mediator and arbitrator Joseph Simeri said no formula exists for determining when to mediate a case.

“This stuff is really not a science, it’s an art. I can’t tell you what I do or how I do it. I don’t have a perceived game plan, I just try to get a feel for people, and how they feel for me,” he said.

Who, when and why

The type of case plays a role in finding the right time frame for mediation. For example, while employment matters may be settled quickly, in personal injury cases, early mediation may not be appropriate if all the facts are unknown.

Indianapolis attorney and mediator Denise Page, with The Mediation Group, mediates primarily personal injury and wrongful death cases.

“What I see makes a mediation blow up and not settle when it’s too early is that all the relevant medical records haven’t been given to the other side. If the medical causation or the damages – loss of income, loss of inventory in a fire loss – if it’s not documented to the satisfaction of the other party, it’s too early,” she said.

Conversely, resentment and frustration can build over time. When parties wait too long to attempt mediation, they may become less likely to cooperate.

“It’s harder to let go of the notion and maybe entertain they’re not totally right,” Page said.

Anderson solo attorney and family law mediator Marianne Woolbert said that while she has never had a case in which she believes parties attempted to mediate too early, she thinks that in divorce, mediation may be ineffective in reaching an agreement if the value of the couple’s belongings hasn’t been assessed. Otherwise, she said, early mediation works well.

“I’ve had people come to see me that want to try to avoid divorce even before they filed and basically want to mediate their lives,” Woolbert said.

Simeri handles a wide range of cases, and he said early mediation is particularly effective in employment matters, often because a worker who has a complaint about an employer has no legal remedy.

“A lot of times, the employee’s maybe just looking for a good reference, or for the employer to not argue with severance pay,” he said.

Simeri said the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission’s internal mediation program, RESOLVE, has been particularly successful in keeping employee complaints from ending up in litigation. Its external program appears to be effective as well – in 2010, the EEOC’s external mediation program reached a resolution in 73.4 percent of cases.

At early stages, Simeri said, neither the employer nor employee has invested a lot of money and time into defending against or pursuing a complaint, and that makes resolution more likely.

Recognizing the right time

You won’t find a “fundamentals of good timing” course in law school, so experience is the key to knowing when to mediate.

“I didn’t learn any of it in school,” Page said. “Each case is different, too. There may be one case that is perfect for settling early, and then there may be a case where there are so many issues that are going to have to be researched, documented, given over to the experts – you know that case is going to be pending for a couple of years.”

Mediators can help their clients recognize when the time is right, too.

Page said some clients may not realize just how long they may have to wait for a case to go to court. Once they’re aware that they may have to wait up to two years for a court date, they may be more inclined to work out an agreement in mediation.

Early on, when a plaintiff’s attorney working on a contingency fee hasn’t invested extensive work in a case, a settlement will generally allow the plaintiff to recover more money.

“If a party is paying their attorney by the hour, when it’s in the early stages, you can point out to them, ‘You’re going to be spending a lot of money on this case,’” Page said.

Setting the pace

Page said that while she tries to keep the process moving, she also recognizes the importance of letting the parties work out their differences at their own speed.

“There are times when somebody tells me, ‘You’re going too fast,’ so in that case, I slow it down,” she said. “Sometimes it takes the passage of time for people to cool off a little bit – there’s something about that going back-and-forth process that really works.”

Woolbert said that generally, she can discern right away whether the parties aren’t going to come to an agreement. But with experience, she’s also learned that maybe one mediation session just isn’t enough time, and that they may need to meet again another day.

“Once you get into the process, you kind of get a feel – it’ll happen as quickly as the parties want it to happen,” Woolbert said.•
 

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in Indiana Lawyer editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Indiana State Bar Association

Indianapolis Bar Association

Evansville Bar Association

Allen County Bar Association

Indiana Lawyer on Facebook

facebook
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. I can understand a 10 yr suspension for drinking and driving and not following the rules,but don't you think the people who compleate their sentences and are trying to be good people of their community,and are on the right path should be able to obtain a drivers license to do as they please.We as a state should encourage good behavior instead of saying well you did all your time but we can't give you a license come on.When is a persons time served than cause from where I'm standing,its still a punishment,when u can't have the freedom to go where ever you want to in car,truck ,motorcycle,maybe their should be better programs for people instead of just throwing them away like daily trash,then expecting them to change because they we in jail or prison for x amount of yrs.Everyone should look around because we all pay each others bills,and keep each other in business..better knowledge equals better community equals better people...just my 2 cents

  2. I was wondering about the 6 million put aside for common attorney fees?does that mean that if you are a plaintiff your attorney fees will be partially covered?

  3. My situation was hopeless me and my husband was on the verge of divorce. I was in a awful state and felt that I was not able to cope with life any longer. I found out about this great spell caster drlawrencespelltemple@hotmail.com and tried him. Well, he did return and now we are doing well again, more than ever before. Thank you so much Drlawrencespelltemple@hotmail.comi will forever be grateful to you Drlawrencespelltemple@hotmail.com

  4. I expressed my thought in the title, long as it was. I am shocked that there is ever immunity from accountability for ANY Government agency. That appears to violate every principle in the US Constitution, which exists to limit Government power and to ensure Government accountability. I don't know how many cases of legitimate child abuse exist, but in the few cases in which I knew the people involved, in every example an anonymous caller used DCS as their personal weapon to strike at innocent people over trivial disagreements that had no connection with any facts. Given that the system is vulnerable to abuse, and given the extreme harm any action by DCS causes to families, I would assume any degree of failure to comply with the smallest infraction of personal rights would result in mandatory review. Even one day of parent-child separation in the absence of reasonable cause for a felony arrest should result in severe penalties to those involved in the action. It appears to me, that like all bureaucracies, DCS is prone to interpret every case as legitimate. This is not an accusation against DCS. It is a statement about the nature of bureaucracies, and the need for ADDED scrutiny of all bureaucratic actions. Frankly, I question the constitutionality of bureaucracies in general, because their power is delegated, and therefore unaccountable. No Government action can be unaccountable if we want to avoid its eventual degeneration into irrelevance and lawlessness, and the law of the jungle. Our Constitution is the source of all Government power, and it is the contract that legitimizes all Government power. To the extent that its various protections against intrusion are set aside, so is the power afforded by that contract. Eventually overstepping the limits of power eliminates that power, as a law of nature. Even total tyranny eventually crumbles to nothing.

  5. Being dedicated to a genre keeps it alive until the masses catch up to the "trend." Kent and Bill are keepin' it LIVE!! Thank you gentlemen..you know your JAZZ.

ADVERTISEMENT