ILNews

Knowing when the time is right

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Knowing when to begin mediation can play a significant role in the success – or failure – of negotiations. And understanding when cases are ripe for negotiation comes with experience. South Bend mediator and arbitrator Joseph Simeri said no formula exists for determining when to mediate a case.

“This stuff is really not a science, it’s an art. I can’t tell you what I do or how I do it. I don’t have a perceived game plan, I just try to get a feel for people, and how they feel for me,” he said.

Who, when and why

The type of case plays a role in finding the right time frame for mediation. For example, while employment matters may be settled quickly, in personal injury cases, early mediation may not be appropriate if all the facts are unknown.

Indianapolis attorney and mediator Denise Page, with The Mediation Group, mediates primarily personal injury and wrongful death cases.

“What I see makes a mediation blow up and not settle when it’s too early is that all the relevant medical records haven’t been given to the other side. If the medical causation or the damages – loss of income, loss of inventory in a fire loss – if it’s not documented to the satisfaction of the other party, it’s too early,” she said.

Conversely, resentment and frustration can build over time. When parties wait too long to attempt mediation, they may become less likely to cooperate.

“It’s harder to let go of the notion and maybe entertain they’re not totally right,” Page said.

Anderson solo attorney and family law mediator Marianne Woolbert said that while she has never had a case in which she believes parties attempted to mediate too early, she thinks that in divorce, mediation may be ineffective in reaching an agreement if the value of the couple’s belongings hasn’t been assessed. Otherwise, she said, early mediation works well.

“I’ve had people come to see me that want to try to avoid divorce even before they filed and basically want to mediate their lives,” Woolbert said.

Simeri handles a wide range of cases, and he said early mediation is particularly effective in employment matters, often because a worker who has a complaint about an employer has no legal remedy.

“A lot of times, the employee’s maybe just looking for a good reference, or for the employer to not argue with severance pay,” he said.

Simeri said the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission’s internal mediation program, RESOLVE, has been particularly successful in keeping employee complaints from ending up in litigation. Its external program appears to be effective as well – in 2010, the EEOC’s external mediation program reached a resolution in 73.4 percent of cases.

At early stages, Simeri said, neither the employer nor employee has invested a lot of money and time into defending against or pursuing a complaint, and that makes resolution more likely.

Recognizing the right time

You won’t find a “fundamentals of good timing” course in law school, so experience is the key to knowing when to mediate.

“I didn’t learn any of it in school,” Page said. “Each case is different, too. There may be one case that is perfect for settling early, and then there may be a case where there are so many issues that are going to have to be researched, documented, given over to the experts – you know that case is going to be pending for a couple of years.”

Mediators can help their clients recognize when the time is right, too.

Page said some clients may not realize just how long they may have to wait for a case to go to court. Once they’re aware that they may have to wait up to two years for a court date, they may be more inclined to work out an agreement in mediation.

Early on, when a plaintiff’s attorney working on a contingency fee hasn’t invested extensive work in a case, a settlement will generally allow the plaintiff to recover more money.

“If a party is paying their attorney by the hour, when it’s in the early stages, you can point out to them, ‘You’re going to be spending a lot of money on this case,’” Page said.

Setting the pace

Page said that while she tries to keep the process moving, she also recognizes the importance of letting the parties work out their differences at their own speed.

“There are times when somebody tells me, ‘You’re going too fast,’ so in that case, I slow it down,” she said. “Sometimes it takes the passage of time for people to cool off a little bit – there’s something about that going back-and-forth process that really works.”

Woolbert said that generally, she can discern right away whether the parties aren’t going to come to an agreement. But with experience, she’s also learned that maybe one mediation session just isn’t enough time, and that they may need to meet again another day.

“Once you get into the process, you kind of get a feel – it’ll happen as quickly as the parties want it to happen,” Woolbert said.•
 

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in Indiana Lawyer editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. Other than a complete lack of any verifiable and valid historical citations to back your wild context-free accusations, you also forget to allege "ate Native American children, ate slave children, ate their own children, and often did it all while using salad forks rather than dinner forks." (gasp)

  2. "So we broke with England for the right to "off" our preborn progeny at will, and allow the processing plant doing the dirty deeds (dirt cheap) to profit on the marketing of those "products of conception." I was completely maleducated on our nation's founding, it would seem. (But I know the ACLU is hard at work to remedy that, too.)" Well, you know, we're just following in the footsteps of our founders who raped women, raped slaves, raped children, maimed immigrants, sold children, stole property, broke promises, broke apart families, killed natives... You know, good God fearing down home Christian folk! :/

  3. Who gives a rats behind about all the fluffy ranking nonsense. What students having to pay off debt need to know is that all schools aren't created equal and students from many schools don't have a snowball's chance of getting a decent paying job straight out of law school. Their lowly ranked lawschool won't tell them that though. When schools start honestly (accurately) reporting *those numbers, things will get interesting real quick, and the looks on student's faces will be priceless!

  4. Whilst it may be true that Judges and Justices enjoy such freedom of time and effort, it certainly does not hold true for the average working person. To say that one must 1) take a day or a half day off work every 3 months, 2) gather a list of information including recent photographs, and 3) set up a time that is convenient for the local sheriff or other such office to complete the registry is more than a bit near-sighted. This may be procedural, and hence, in the near-sighted minds of the court, not 'punishment,' but it is in fact 'punishment.' The local sheriffs probably feel a little punished too by the overwork. Registries serve to punish the offender whilst simultaneously providing the public at large with a false sense of security. The false sense of security is dangerous to the public who may not exercise due diligence by thinking there are no offenders in their locale. In fact, the registry only informs them of those who have been convicted.

  5. Unfortunately, the court doesn't understand the difference between ebidta and adjusted ebidta as they clearly got the ruling wrong based on their misunderstanding

ADVERTISEMENT