ILNews

Krieg DeVault lawyer builds national practice from northern Indiana office

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Robert Wade took it as a challenge when a colleague told him a few years back he’d never be able to launch a national health care practice from the South Bend market, that instead he would need a Chicago or Washington, D.C., address.

“I said, ‘You watch me,’” Wade recalled.

A partner in Krieg DeVault LLP’s South Bend/Mishawaka office, Wade and his team last month were hired as consulting counsel to a Florida hospital that agreed to a historic settlement in March to resolve federal physician-referral claims under the Stark Law.

Bob-Wade-at-Halifax-15col.jpg Mishawaka attorney Robert Wade stands outside Halifax Health Medical Center in Daytona Beach, Fla. His team from Krieg DeVault LLP has been contracted to oversee the largest settlement in history under the Stark Law (Photo courtesy of Halifax Health)

“It’s the largest settlement for a hospital to date” under the law, Wade said of the $85 million agreement with the Department of Justice by Halifax Health Medical Center of Daytona Beach, Fla. “We’re treading in a bunch of new ground, so to speak, and I’m happy to be a trailblazer in respect to this role.”

It’s confirmation that a small-town practice can hit the big time.

“I would estimate over a five-year period we’re probably talking somewhere around $3 to $4 million” in billings for the team of six or seven attorneys. “Obviously it is a significant engagement.”

The Stark Law involves Medicare and Medicaid and generally bars physicians from referring those patients for designated services to an entity where the doctor or a family member has a financial relationship, either as an owner or employee.

A Halifax compliance officer filed a qui tam whistleblower suit after she said her concerns about payments to physicians were being ignored. She claimed a bonus structure for oncologists included incentives for referrals that violated the Stark Law, and earlier this year a federal judge in Orlando agreed.

The government alleged Halifax had contracts with six oncologists that provided bonuses as an incentive for ordering prescription drugs and tests. The government also claimed Halifax paid neurosurgeons more than fair-market value for their services.

As part of the settlement, Halifax is required to be under federal oversight for five years in accordance with a corporate integrity agreement. Wade will work with the hospital’s board to implement the agreement and oversee compliance programs.

According to the Department of Justice, the settlement requires the hospital to undertake substantial internal compliance reforms and submit Medicare and Medicaid claims for independent review over the next five years.

“Part of my role is to be the eyes and ears of the board as they’re carrying out their mandated programs,” Wade said. The first part of the compliance program that began this month involves training for all members of the medical staff on practices that could run afoul of the Stark Law, Anti-Kickback Statute and related laws. Training is highly tailored and individualized.

Halifax chose to settle rather than contest the alleged violations in court, which could have resulted in risking liability of more than $800 million. By the time of settlement, Halifax had spent more than $20 million in legal fees, he said.

“Stark produces what I call very Draconian outcomes,” Wade said. “This is a hyper-technical violation,” he said of the doctors’ bonus pool that got the hospital in trouble. The Halifax settlement, and some even larger judgments against providers for Stark violations “are really putting a chilling effect on the entire industry.”

“Lots of hospitals are doing a review of financial arrangements,” Wade said. Providers realize they can avoid some of the more severe penalties by self-reporting referral structures and other arrangements they believe might violate the Stark Law.

Krieg DeVault Executive Committee member Thomas Hutchinson said Wade’s practice underscores the firm’s commitment to having a nationally recognized health care practice.

“We are very honored that Bob was chosen as the compliance expert to Halifax Health to assist in fulfilling the hospital’s corporate integrity agreement as part of the largest Stark Law settlement in history. Bob’s strong national reputation in the area of Stark Law and health care compliance is a natural fit for the hospital,” Hutchinson said.

Wade said more than a couple dozen firms competed for the Halifax consulting work. As someone who’s written and lectured extensively on Stark and related laws and is viewed as a thought-leader on such topics, he said, “I was watching the case from afar” before his team was selected.

With prior experience as in-house counsel at St. Joseph Regional Medical Center in South Bend and assurance he would be the Halifax board’s point person, Wade had a winning proposal. “One of the board members questioned me and said, ‘Are we hiring you or hiring the people from your firm?’”

Wade said he replied, “I am going to be front and center. I’m going to be the face for this project.”

The Krieg DeVault group’s clients now include about 25 hospitals around the country for the practice focused largely on Stark Law and fair-market value issues. Wade is in high demand, currently traveling to Daytona Beach at least a couple of times a month.

And now, he’s got about as far-flung a national practice as one can get.

“Two weeks ago, as I left Daytona Beach, I flew to Honolulu for a one-day meeting in Honolulu and flew back,” he said in early June. “So far, since Jan. 1, I’ve logged about 75 nights in a hotel room.

“To have a national practice, that’s something you have to commit to,” he concluded.•

-----------------------------------------

Stark Law at a glance
Who: Named for Rep. Pete Stark (D-Calif.) Also known as the Physician Self-Referral Law.
What: Prohibits a physician from referring Medicare or Medicaid patients to an entity for a designated health service if the doctor has a financial relationship with the entity.
When: “Stark I” effective 1992; “Stark II” effective 1994.
Penalties: Civil penalties for violations can range up to $15,000 per billed medical service provided in violation of the law. Providers may be excluded from Medicare.
Citations: 42 U.S.C. § 1395nn (as relates to Medicare); 42 U.S.C. 1396b(s) (Medicaid).

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in Indiana Lawyer editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Indiana State Bar Association

Indianapolis Bar Association

Evansville Bar Association

Allen County Bar Association

Indiana Lawyer on Facebook

facebook
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. He called our nation a nation of cowards because we didn't want to talk about race. That was a cheap shot coming from the top cop. The man who decides who gets the federal government indicts. Wow. Not a gentleman if that is the measure. More importantly, this insult delivered as we all understand, to white people-- without him or anybody needing to explain that is precisely what he meant-- but this is an insult to timid white persons who fear the government and don't want to say anything about race for fear of being accused a racist. With all the legal heat that can come down on somebody if they say something which can be construed by a prosecutor like Mr Holder as racist, is it any wonder white people-- that's who he meant obviously-- is there any surprise that white people don't want to talk about race? And as lawyers we have even less freedom lest our remarks be considered violations of the rules. Mr Holder also demonstrated his bias by publically visiting with the family of the young man who was killed by a police offering in the line of duty, which was a very strong indicator of bias agains the offer who is under investigation, and was a failure to lead properly by letting his investigators do their job without him predetermining the proper outcome. He also has potentially biased the jury pool. All in all this worsens race relations by feeding into the perception shared by whites as well as blacks that justice will not be impartial. I will say this much, I do not blame Obama for all of HOlder's missteps. Obama has done a lot of things to stay above the fray and try and be a leader for all Americans. Maybe he should have reigned Holder in some but Obama's got his hands full with other problelms. Oh did I mention HOlder is a bank crony who will probably get a job in a silkstocking law firm working for millions of bucks a year defending bankers whom he didn't have the integrity or courage to hold to account for their acts of fraud on the United States, other financial institutions, and the people. His tenure will be regarded by history as a failure of leadership at one of the most important jobs in our nation. Finally and most importantly besides him insulting the public and letting off the big financial cheats, he has been at the forefront of over-prosecuting the secrecy laws to punish whistleblowers and chill free speech. What has Holder done to vindicate the rights of privacy of the American public against the illegal snooping of the NSA? He could have charged NSA personnel with violations of law for their warrantless wiretapping which has been done millions of times and instead he did not persecute a single soul. That is a defalcation of historical proportions and it signals to the public that the government DOJ under him was not willing to do a damn thing to protect the public against the rapid growth of the illegal surveillance state. Who else could have done this? Nobody. And for that omission Obama deserves the blame too. Here were are sliding into a police state and Eric Holder made it go all the faster.

  2. JOE CLAYPOOL candidate for Superior Court in Harrison County - Indiana This candidate is misleading voters to think he is a Judge by putting Elect Judge Joe Claypool on his campaign literature. paragraphs 2 and 9 below clearly indicate this injustice to voting public to gain employment. What can we do? Indiana Code - Section 35-43-5-3: Deception (a) A person who: (1) being an officer, manager, or other person participating in the direction of a credit institution, knowingly or intentionally receives or permits the receipt of a deposit or other investment, knowing that the institution is insolvent; (2) knowingly or intentionally makes a false or misleading written statement with intent to obtain property, employment, or an educational opportunity; (3) misapplies entrusted property, property of a governmental entity, or property of a credit institution in a manner that the person knows is unlawful or that the person knows involves substantial risk of loss or detriment to either the owner of the property or to a person for whose benefit the property was entrusted; (4) knowingly or intentionally, in the regular course of business, either: (A) uses or possesses for use a false weight or measure or other device for falsely determining or recording the quality or quantity of any commodity; or (B) sells, offers, or displays for sale or delivers less than the represented quality or quantity of any commodity; (5) with intent to defraud another person furnishing electricity, gas, water, telecommunication, or any other utility service, avoids a lawful charge for that service by scheme or device or by tampering with facilities or equipment of the person furnishing the service; (6) with intent to defraud, misrepresents the identity of the person or another person or the identity or quality of property; (7) with intent to defraud an owner of a coin machine, deposits a slug in that machine; (8) with intent to enable the person or another person to deposit a slug in a coin machine, makes, possesses, or disposes of a slug; (9) disseminates to the public an advertisement that the person knows is false, misleading, or deceptive, with intent to promote the purchase or sale of property or the acceptance of employment;

  3. The story that you have shared is quite interesting and also the information is very helpful. Thanks for sharing the article. For more info: http://www.treasurecoastbailbonds.com/

  4. I grew up on a farm and live in the county and it's interesting that the big industrial farmers like Jeff Shoaf don't live next to their industrial operations...

  5. So that none are misinformed by my posting wihtout a non de plume here, please allow me to state that I am NOT an Indiana licensed attorney, although I am an Indiana resident approved to practice law and represent clients in Indiana's fed court of Nth Dist and before the 7th circuit. I remain licensed in KS, since 1996, no discipline. This must be clarified since the IN court records will reveal that I did sit for and pass the Indiana bar last February. Yet be not confused by the fact that I was so allowed to be tested .... I am not, to be clear in the service of my duty to be absolutely candid about this, I AM NOT a member of the Indiana bar, and might never be so licensed given my unrepented from errors of thought documented in this opinion, at fn2, which likely supports Mr Smith's initial post in this thread: http://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-7th-circuit/1592921.html

ADVERTISEMENT