ILNews

Krieg DeVault lawyer builds national practice from northern Indiana office

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Robert Wade took it as a challenge when a colleague told him a few years back he’d never be able to launch a national health care practice from the South Bend market, that instead he would need a Chicago or Washington, D.C., address.

“I said, ‘You watch me,’” Wade recalled.

A partner in Krieg DeVault LLP’s South Bend/Mishawaka office, Wade and his team last month were hired as consulting counsel to a Florida hospital that agreed to a historic settlement in March to resolve federal physician-referral claims under the Stark Law.

Bob-Wade-at-Halifax-15col.jpg Mishawaka attorney Robert Wade stands outside Halifax Health Medical Center in Daytona Beach, Fla. His team from Krieg DeVault LLP has been contracted to oversee the largest settlement in history under the Stark Law (Photo courtesy of Halifax Health)

“It’s the largest settlement for a hospital to date” under the law, Wade said of the $85 million agreement with the Department of Justice by Halifax Health Medical Center of Daytona Beach, Fla. “We’re treading in a bunch of new ground, so to speak, and I’m happy to be a trailblazer in respect to this role.”

It’s confirmation that a small-town practice can hit the big time.

“I would estimate over a five-year period we’re probably talking somewhere around $3 to $4 million” in billings for the team of six or seven attorneys. “Obviously it is a significant engagement.”

The Stark Law involves Medicare and Medicaid and generally bars physicians from referring those patients for designated services to an entity where the doctor or a family member has a financial relationship, either as an owner or employee.

A Halifax compliance officer filed a qui tam whistleblower suit after she said her concerns about payments to physicians were being ignored. She claimed a bonus structure for oncologists included incentives for referrals that violated the Stark Law, and earlier this year a federal judge in Orlando agreed.

The government alleged Halifax had contracts with six oncologists that provided bonuses as an incentive for ordering prescription drugs and tests. The government also claimed Halifax paid neurosurgeons more than fair-market value for their services.

As part of the settlement, Halifax is required to be under federal oversight for five years in accordance with a corporate integrity agreement. Wade will work with the hospital’s board to implement the agreement and oversee compliance programs.

According to the Department of Justice, the settlement requires the hospital to undertake substantial internal compliance reforms and submit Medicare and Medicaid claims for independent review over the next five years.

“Part of my role is to be the eyes and ears of the board as they’re carrying out their mandated programs,” Wade said. The first part of the compliance program that began this month involves training for all members of the medical staff on practices that could run afoul of the Stark Law, Anti-Kickback Statute and related laws. Training is highly tailored and individualized.

Halifax chose to settle rather than contest the alleged violations in court, which could have resulted in risking liability of more than $800 million. By the time of settlement, Halifax had spent more than $20 million in legal fees, he said.

“Stark produces what I call very Draconian outcomes,” Wade said. “This is a hyper-technical violation,” he said of the doctors’ bonus pool that got the hospital in trouble. The Halifax settlement, and some even larger judgments against providers for Stark violations “are really putting a chilling effect on the entire industry.”

“Lots of hospitals are doing a review of financial arrangements,” Wade said. Providers realize they can avoid some of the more severe penalties by self-reporting referral structures and other arrangements they believe might violate the Stark Law.

Krieg DeVault Executive Committee member Thomas Hutchinson said Wade’s practice underscores the firm’s commitment to having a nationally recognized health care practice.

“We are very honored that Bob was chosen as the compliance expert to Halifax Health to assist in fulfilling the hospital’s corporate integrity agreement as part of the largest Stark Law settlement in history. Bob’s strong national reputation in the area of Stark Law and health care compliance is a natural fit for the hospital,” Hutchinson said.

Wade said more than a couple dozen firms competed for the Halifax consulting work. As someone who’s written and lectured extensively on Stark and related laws and is viewed as a thought-leader on such topics, he said, “I was watching the case from afar” before his team was selected.

With prior experience as in-house counsel at St. Joseph Regional Medical Center in South Bend and assurance he would be the Halifax board’s point person, Wade had a winning proposal. “One of the board members questioned me and said, ‘Are we hiring you or hiring the people from your firm?’”

Wade said he replied, “I am going to be front and center. I’m going to be the face for this project.”

The Krieg DeVault group’s clients now include about 25 hospitals around the country for the practice focused largely on Stark Law and fair-market value issues. Wade is in high demand, currently traveling to Daytona Beach at least a couple of times a month.

And now, he’s got about as far-flung a national practice as one can get.

“Two weeks ago, as I left Daytona Beach, I flew to Honolulu for a one-day meeting in Honolulu and flew back,” he said in early June. “So far, since Jan. 1, I’ve logged about 75 nights in a hotel room.

“To have a national practice, that’s something you have to commit to,” he concluded.•

-----------------------------------------

Stark Law at a glance
Who: Named for Rep. Pete Stark (D-Calif.) Also known as the Physician Self-Referral Law.
What: Prohibits a physician from referring Medicare or Medicaid patients to an entity for a designated health service if the doctor has a financial relationship with the entity.
When: “Stark I” effective 1992; “Stark II” effective 1994.
Penalties: Civil penalties for violations can range up to $15,000 per billed medical service provided in violation of the law. Providers may be excluded from Medicare.
Citations: 42 U.S.C. § 1395nn (as relates to Medicare); 42 U.S.C. 1396b(s) (Medicaid).

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in Indiana Lawyer editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. Call it unauthorized law if you must, a regulatory wrong, but it was fraud and theft well beyond that, a seeming crime! "In three specific cases, the hearing officer found that Westerfield did little to no work for her clients but only issued a partial refund or no refund at all." That is theft by deception, folks. "In its decision to suspend Westerfield, the Supreme Court noted that she already had a long disciplinary history dating back to 1996 and had previously been suspended in 2004 and indefinitely suspended in 2005. She was reinstated in 2009 after finally giving the commission a response to the grievance for which she was suspended in 2004." WOW -- was the Indiana Supreme Court complicit in her fraud? Talk about being on notice of a real bad actor .... "Further, the justices noted that during her testimony, Westerfield was “disingenuous and evasive” about her relationship with Tope and attempted to distance herself from him. They also wrote that other aggravating factors existed in Westerfield’s case, such as her lack of remorse." WOW, and yet she only got 18 months on the bench, and if she shows up and cries for them in a year and a half, and pays money to JLAP for group therapy ... back in to ride roughshod over hapless clients (or are they "marks") once again! Aint Hoosier lawyering a great money making adventure!!! Just live for the bucks, even if filthy lucre, and come out a-ok. ME on the other hand??? Lifetime banishment for blowing the whistle on unconstitutional governance. Yes, had I ripped off clients or had ANY disciplinary history for doing that I would have fared better, most likely, as that it would have revealed me motivated by Mammon and not Faith. Check it out if you doubt my reading of this, compare and contrast the above 18 months with my lifetime banishment from court, see appendix for Bar Examiners report which the ISC adopted without substantive review: https://www.scribd.com/doc/299040839/2016Petitionforcert-to-SCOTUS

  2. Wow, over a quarter million dollars? That is a a lot of commissary money! Over what time frame? Years I would guess. Anyone ever try to blow the whistle? Probably not, since most Hoosiers who take notice of such things realize that Hoosier whistleblowers are almost always pilloried. If someone did blow the whistle, they were likely fired. The persecution of whistleblowers is a sure sign of far too much government corruption. Details of my own personal experience at the top of Hoosier governance available upon request ... maybe a "fake news" media outlet will have the courage to tell the stories of Hoosier whistleblowers that the "real" Hoosier media (cough) will not deign to touch. (They are part of the problem.)

  3. So if I am reading it right, only if and when African American college students agree to receive checks labeling them as "Negroes" do they receive aid from the UNCF or the Quaker's Educational Fund? In other words, to borrow from the Indiana Appellate Court, "the [nonprofit] supposed to be [their] advocate, refers to [students] in a racially offensive manner. While there is no evidence that [the nonprofits] intended harm to [African American students], the harm was nonetheless inflicted. [Black students are] presented to [academia and future employers] in a racially offensive manner. For these reasons, [such] performance [is] deficient and also prejudice[ial]." Maybe even DEPLORABLE???

  4. I'm the poor soul who spent over 10 years in prison with many many other prisoners trying to kill me for being charged with a sex offense THAT I DID NOT COMMIT i was in jail for a battery charge for helping a friend leave a boyfriend who beat her I've been saying for over 28 years that i did not and would never hurt a child like that mine or anybody's child but NOBODY wants to believe that i might not be guilty of this horrible crime or think that when i say that ALL the paperwork concerning my conviction has strangely DISAPPEARED or even when the long beach judge re-sentenced me over 14 months on a already filed plea bargain out of another districts court then had it filed under a fake name so i could not find while trying to fight my conviction on appeal in a nut shell people are ALWAYS quick to believe the worst about some one well I DID NOT HURT ANY CHILD EVER IN MY LIFE AND HAVE SAID THIS FOR ALMOST 30 YEARS please if anybody can me get some kind of justice it would be greatly appreciated respectfully written wrongly accused Brian Valenti

  5. A high ranking Indiana supreme Court operative caught red handed leading a group using the uber offensive N word! She must denounce or be denounced! (Or not since she is an insider ... rules do not apply to them). Evidence here: http://m.indianacompanies.us/friends-educational-fund-for-negroes.364110.company.v2#top_info

ADVERTISEMENT