Lady Justice gets 'green' makeover

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Peering out the window at the roof that covers the interior space of the federal courthouse in Indianapolis, Judge Sarah Evans Barker would often remark how nice it would be if that industrial-looking slab was made pretty and accessible.

What she described as “idle chatter” has become a reality. The roof of the internal courtyard space at the Birch Bayh Federal Building and U.S. Courthouse is now covered with 80,000 individual sedum that add an extra layer of insulation and reduce the urban heat-island effect.

courthouse Murals painted by Hoosier artist Grant Christian in 1935 on the third floor of the courthouse were restored as part of the renovations. (IL Photo/ Perry Reichanadter)

With a rooftop that is flush with flora instead of a dark heat-absorbing membrane, the courthouse becomes one of just 15 historic buildings in the U.S. General Service Administration’s inventory across the country to have a “green” roof.

The greening – literally – of the rooftop is part of a $66.8 million upgrade of the building with funds coming from the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act. Work on the roof along with additional upgrades to increase the energy efficiency of the facility as well as to improve the public safety system began in December 2009 and was substantially complete on Aug. 27, 2012, according to the U.S. General Services Administration.

Barker explained it like this: The art restoration project undertaken for the 2003 centennial celebration of the building “put a new dress and coat of makeup on the old grand dame. This time, we gave her a hip replacement.”

Much of the current refurbishment is not visible to the public, but the structural improvements are intended to extend the use of the building.

The project included:

• Replacing the roof and restoring the exterior windows;

• Upgrading the heating, ventilation and air conditioning system, temperature controls, plumbing, electrical service, and lighting;

• Improving the fire protection and alarm systems throughout the building;

• Renovating the public and jury restrooms to meet accessibility requirements.

Environmentally friendly additions expand beyond the green courtyard roof to a rainwater harvesting system that provides the water for the public toilets and ultra-low consumption plumbing fixtures. The rainwater system is expected to reduce water usage by as much as 30 percent.

Except for a few years in private practice, Barker has spent much of her legal career in the Bayh building, going back to her tenure as an assistant U.S. attorney. To her, being able to work in that structure has been a “wonderful gift.”

“Nobody comes within the halls and walls of this place and is not touched by it,” Barker said.

The grandeur of its design makes the building a transformative place, she continued. The space does the vital work of making the defendants and litigants feel small, reducing their egos so they can move into a new understanding of themselves and their relationship with society.

Laura Briggs, clerk of the court, also noted the impact the building has on people. Even during the day when the courthouse staff is busy, there is still a feeling of quiet reverence. When people come inside to conduct their business with the court, they get a sense of reverence and respect for the federal judiciary system.

“It’s overwhelming,” Briggs said. “You could never recreate (this building) today.”

Construction of the Federal Building and U.S. Courthouse between Ohio and New York streets began in 1902. Originally, the Beaux Arts structure was U-shaped and housed the main post office along with the federal courts and offices. The north wing addition, completed in 1938, closed the U-shape and created an interior courtyard.

In 1974, the building was listed in the National Register of Historic Places, and in 2003, it was renamed in honor of U.S. Senator Birch Bayh.

il-us-Courthouse03-15col.jpg The interior courtyard roof of the federal courthouse in Indianapolis is now covered with plants to control energy costs.(IL Photo/ Perry Reichanadter)

During the recent structural upgrade, the judges returned to their circuit rider roots as they switched courtrooms and vacated their chambers to accommodate the construction. Clerks and staff members were also jostled around, each spending several months in swing space.

“It was a little inconvenient but it was not a bad thing,” Briggs said. “Everybody enjoyed the time to meet other people and everybody benefitted from weeding out extraneous possessions collected over the years.”

One part of the renovation that added to the beauty of the building was the restoration of the historical murals in the southwest corner of the third floor. Painted by Hoosier Grant Christian in 1935 working under the Treasury Relief Art Project, the murals depict historic and patriotic scenes from Indiana.

The artwork, in need of aesthetic and structural repairs, was removed from the wall and transported to the studios of Page Conservation Inc. for treatment. There, the murals were given an extensive cleaning to remove the yellowed varnish and grime that had accumulated on the surface. Also, the old adhesive was taken off and a linen interleaf was applied for additional stability.

Then the murals were transported back to the courthouse and re-mounted to the newly repaired plaster walls.

“They look so much better,” said Doria Lynch, the court historian. “It was a delightful day to come back as they were being reinstalled. It was tremendous.”

In addition, the historic murals in Courtroom 202 were conserved for the first time as a comprehensive whole, repairing flaking plaster and cracking as well as cleaning years of dirt and grime.

Over the years, Barker has witnessed what she called the “magical way” juries respond to the building as they look wide-eyed at the paintings and stained glass windows. And she remembers those who have made special trips to see the space, like retired U.S. Supreme Court Justice Sandra Day O’Connor, who arrived a day ahead of her scheduled lecture to law students just to tour the building.

Visitors to the building today will see a garden, rather than black tar, on the interior roof. The plants were put there for the practical purpose of conserving energy and reducing utility costs, but Barker noted another, less concrete, benefit.

When she recently peered out a window in a colleague’s office, she did not have to muse about what could or should be. Instead, she felt happy at being able to look at something that is green and growing.•


Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in Indiana Lawyer editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. I think the cops are doing a great job locking up criminals. The Murder rates in the inner cities are skyrocketing and you think that too any people are being incarcerated. Maybe we need to lock up more of them. We have the ACLU, BLM, NAACP, Civil right Division of the DOJ, the innocent Project etc. We have court system with an appeal process that can go on for years, with attorneys supplied by the government. I'm confused as to how that translates into the idea that the defendants are not being represented properly. Maybe the attorneys need to do more Pro-Bono work

  2. We do not have 10% of our population (which would mean about 32 million) incarcerated. It's closer to 2%.

  3. If a class action suit or other manner of retribution is possible, count me in. I have email and voicemail from the man. He colluded with opposing counsel, I am certain. My case was damaged so severely it nearly lost me everything and I am still paying dearly.

  4. There's probably a lot of blame that can be cast around for Indiana Tech's abysmal bar passage rate this last February. The folks who decided that Indiana, a state with roughly 16,000 to 18,000 attorneys, needs a fifth law school need to question the motives that drove their support of this project. Others, who have been "strong supporters" of the law school, should likewise ask themselves why they believe this institution should be supported. Is it because it fills some real need in the state? Or is it, instead, nothing more than a resume builder for those who teach there part-time? And others who make excuses for the students' poor performance, especially those who offer nothing more than conspiracy theories to back up their claims--who are they helping? What evidence do they have to support their posturing? Ultimately, though, like most everything in life, whether one succeeds or fails is entirely within one's own hands. At least one student from Indiana Tech proved this when he/she took and passed the February bar. A second Indiana Tech student proved this when they took the bar in another state and passed. As for the remaining 9 who took the bar and didn't pass (apparently, one of the students successfully appealed his/her original score), it's now up to them (and nobody else) to ensure that they pass on their second attempt. These folks should feel no shame; many currently successful practicing attorneys failed the bar exam on their first try. These same attorneys picked themselves up, dusted themselves off, and got back to the rigorous study needed to ensure they would pass on their second go 'round. This is what the Indiana Tech students who didn't pass the first time need to do. Of course, none of this answers such questions as whether Indiana Tech should be accredited by the ABA, whether the school should keep its doors open, or, most importantly, whether it should have even opened its doors in the first place. Those who promoted the idea of a fifth law school in Indiana need to do a lot of soul-searching regarding their decisions. These same people should never be allowed, again, to have a say about the future of legal education in this state or anywhere else. Indiana already has four law schools. That's probably one more than it really needs. But it's more than enough.

  5. This man Steve Hubbard goes on any online post or forum he can find and tries to push his company. He said court reporters would be obsolete a few years ago, yet here we are. How does he have time to search out every single post about court reporters and even spy in private court reporting forums if his company is so successful???? Dude, get a life. And back to what this post was about, I agree that some national firms cause a huge problem.