ILNews

Lady Justice gets 'green' makeover

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Peering out the window at the roof that covers the interior space of the federal courthouse in Indianapolis, Judge Sarah Evans Barker would often remark how nice it would be if that industrial-looking slab was made pretty and accessible.

What she described as “idle chatter” has become a reality. The roof of the internal courtyard space at the Birch Bayh Federal Building and U.S. Courthouse is now covered with 80,000 individual sedum that add an extra layer of insulation and reduce the urban heat-island effect.

courthouse Murals painted by Hoosier artist Grant Christian in 1935 on the third floor of the courthouse were restored as part of the renovations. (IL Photo/ Perry Reichanadter)

With a rooftop that is flush with flora instead of a dark heat-absorbing membrane, the courthouse becomes one of just 15 historic buildings in the U.S. General Service Administration’s inventory across the country to have a “green” roof.

The greening – literally – of the rooftop is part of a $66.8 million upgrade of the building with funds coming from the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act. Work on the roof along with additional upgrades to increase the energy efficiency of the facility as well as to improve the public safety system began in December 2009 and was substantially complete on Aug. 27, 2012, according to the U.S. General Services Administration.

Barker explained it like this: The art restoration project undertaken for the 2003 centennial celebration of the building “put a new dress and coat of makeup on the old grand dame. This time, we gave her a hip replacement.”

Much of the current refurbishment is not visible to the public, but the structural improvements are intended to extend the use of the building.

The project included:

• Replacing the roof and restoring the exterior windows;

• Upgrading the heating, ventilation and air conditioning system, temperature controls, plumbing, electrical service, and lighting;

• Improving the fire protection and alarm systems throughout the building;

• Renovating the public and jury restrooms to meet accessibility requirements.

Environmentally friendly additions expand beyond the green courtyard roof to a rainwater harvesting system that provides the water for the public toilets and ultra-low consumption plumbing fixtures. The rainwater system is expected to reduce water usage by as much as 30 percent.

Except for a few years in private practice, Barker has spent much of her legal career in the Bayh building, going back to her tenure as an assistant U.S. attorney. To her, being able to work in that structure has been a “wonderful gift.”

“Nobody comes within the halls and walls of this place and is not touched by it,” Barker said.

The grandeur of its design makes the building a transformative place, she continued. The space does the vital work of making the defendants and litigants feel small, reducing their egos so they can move into a new understanding of themselves and their relationship with society.

Laura Briggs, clerk of the court, also noted the impact the building has on people. Even during the day when the courthouse staff is busy, there is still a feeling of quiet reverence. When people come inside to conduct their business with the court, they get a sense of reverence and respect for the federal judiciary system.

“It’s overwhelming,” Briggs said. “You could never recreate (this building) today.”

Construction of the Federal Building and U.S. Courthouse between Ohio and New York streets began in 1902. Originally, the Beaux Arts structure was U-shaped and housed the main post office along with the federal courts and offices. The north wing addition, completed in 1938, closed the U-shape and created an interior courtyard.

In 1974, the building was listed in the National Register of Historic Places, and in 2003, it was renamed in honor of U.S. Senator Birch Bayh.

il-us-Courthouse03-15col.jpg The interior courtyard roof of the federal courthouse in Indianapolis is now covered with plants to control energy costs.(IL Photo/ Perry Reichanadter)

During the recent structural upgrade, the judges returned to their circuit rider roots as they switched courtrooms and vacated their chambers to accommodate the construction. Clerks and staff members were also jostled around, each spending several months in swing space.

“It was a little inconvenient but it was not a bad thing,” Briggs said. “Everybody enjoyed the time to meet other people and everybody benefitted from weeding out extraneous possessions collected over the years.”

One part of the renovation that added to the beauty of the building was the restoration of the historical murals in the southwest corner of the third floor. Painted by Hoosier Grant Christian in 1935 working under the Treasury Relief Art Project, the murals depict historic and patriotic scenes from Indiana.

The artwork, in need of aesthetic and structural repairs, was removed from the wall and transported to the studios of Page Conservation Inc. for treatment. There, the murals were given an extensive cleaning to remove the yellowed varnish and grime that had accumulated on the surface. Also, the old adhesive was taken off and a linen interleaf was applied for additional stability.

Then the murals were transported back to the courthouse and re-mounted to the newly repaired plaster walls.

“They look so much better,” said Doria Lynch, the court historian. “It was a delightful day to come back as they were being reinstalled. It was tremendous.”

In addition, the historic murals in Courtroom 202 were conserved for the first time as a comprehensive whole, repairing flaking plaster and cracking as well as cleaning years of dirt and grime.

Over the years, Barker has witnessed what she called the “magical way” juries respond to the building as they look wide-eyed at the paintings and stained glass windows. And she remembers those who have made special trips to see the space, like retired U.S. Supreme Court Justice Sandra Day O’Connor, who arrived a day ahead of her scheduled lecture to law students just to tour the building.

Visitors to the building today will see a garden, rather than black tar, on the interior roof. The plants were put there for the practical purpose of conserving energy and reducing utility costs, but Barker noted another, less concrete, benefit.

When she recently peered out a window in a colleague’s office, she did not have to muse about what could or should be. Instead, she felt happy at being able to look at something that is green and growing.•

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in Indiana Lawyer editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. I have been on this program while on parole from 2011-2013. No person should be forced mentally to share private details of their personal life with total strangers. Also giving permission for a mental therapist to report to your parole agent that your not participating in group therapy because you don't have the financial mean to be in the group therapy. I was personally singled out and sent back three times for not having money and also sent back within the six month when you aren't to be sent according to state law. I will work to het this INSOMM's removed from this state. I also had twelve or thirteen parole agents with a fifteen month period. Thanks for your time.

  2. Our nation produces very few jurists of the caliber of Justice DOUGLAS and his peers these days. Here is that great civil libertarian, who recognized government as both a blessing and, when corrupted by ideological interests, a curse: "Once the investigator has only the conscience of government as a guide, the conscience can become ‘ravenous,’ as Cromwell, bent on destroying Thomas More, said in Bolt, A Man For All Seasons (1960), p. 120. The First Amendment mirrors many episodes where men, harried and harassed by government, sought refuge in their conscience, as these lines of Thomas More show: ‘MORE: And when we stand before God, and you are sent to Paradise for doing according to your conscience, *575 and I am damned for not doing according to mine, will you come with me, for fellowship? ‘CRANMER: So those of us whose names are there are damned, Sir Thomas? ‘MORE: I don't know, Your Grace. I have no window to look into another man's conscience. I condemn no one. ‘CRANMER: Then the matter is capable of question? ‘MORE: Certainly. ‘CRANMER: But that you owe obedience to your King is not capable of question. So weigh a doubt against a certainty—and sign. ‘MORE: Some men think the Earth is round, others think it flat; it is a matter capable of question. But if it is flat, will the King's command make it round? And if it is round, will the King's command flatten it? No, I will not sign.’ Id., pp. 132—133. DOUGLAS THEN WROTE: Where government is the Big Brother,11 privacy gives way to surveillance. **909 But our commitment is otherwise. *576 By the First Amendment we have staked our security on freedom to promote a multiplicity of ideas, to associate at will with kindred spirits, and to defy governmental intrusion into these precincts" Gibson v. Florida Legislative Investigation Comm., 372 U.S. 539, 574-76, 83 S. Ct. 889, 908-09, 9 L. Ed. 2d 929 (1963) Mr. Justice DOUGLAS, concurring. I write: Happy Memorial Day to all -- God please bless our fallen who lived and died to preserve constitutional governance in our wonderful series of Republics. And God open the eyes of those government officials who denounce the constitutions of these Republics by arbitrary actions arising out capricious motives.

  3. From back in the day before secularism got a stranglehold on Hoosier jurists comes this great excerpt via Indiana federal court judge Allan Sharp, dedicated to those many Indiana government attorneys (with whom I have dealt) who count the law as a mere tool, an optional tool that is not to be used when political correctness compels a more acceptable result than merely following the path that the law directs: ALLEN SHARP, District Judge. I. In a scene following a visit by Henry VIII to the home of Sir Thomas More, playwriter Robert Bolt puts the following words into the mouths of his characters: Margaret: Father, that man's bad. MORE: There is no law against that. ROPER: There is! God's law! MORE: Then God can arrest him. ROPER: Sophistication upon sophistication! MORE: No, sheer simplicity. The law, Roper, the law. I know what's legal not what's right. And I'll stick to what's legal. ROPER: Then you set man's law above God's! MORE: No, far below; but let me draw your attention to a fact I'm not God. The currents and eddies of right and wrong, which you find such plain sailing, I can't navigate. I'm no voyager. But in the thickets of law, oh, there I'm a forester. I doubt if there's a man alive who could follow me there, thank God... ALICE: (Exasperated, pointing after Rich) While you talk, he's gone! MORE: And go he should, if he was the Devil himself, until he broke the law! ROPER: So now you'd give the Devil benefit of law! MORE: Yes. What would you do? Cut a great road through the law to get after the Devil? ROPER: I'd cut down every law in England to do that! MORE: (Roused and excited) Oh? (Advances on Roper) And when the last law was down, and the Devil turned round on you where would you hide, Roper, the laws being flat? (He leaves *1257 him) This country's planted thick with laws from coast to coast man's laws, not God's and if you cut them down and you're just the man to do it d'you really think you would stand upright in the winds that would blow then? (Quietly) Yes, I'd give the Devil benefit of law, for my own safety's sake. ROPER: I have long suspected this; this is the golden calf; the law's your god. MORE: (Wearily) Oh, Roper, you're a fool, God's my god... (Rather bitterly) But I find him rather too (Very bitterly) subtle... I don't know where he is nor what he wants. ROPER: My God wants service, to the end and unremitting; nothing else! MORE: (Dryly) Are you sure that's God! He sounds like Moloch. But indeed it may be God And whoever hunts for me, Roper, God or Devil, will find me hiding in the thickets of the law! And I'll hide my daughter with me! Not hoist her up the mainmast of your seagoing principles! They put about too nimbly! (Exit More. They all look after him). Pgs. 65-67, A MAN FOR ALL SEASONS A Play in Two Acts, Robert Bolt, Random House, New York, 1960. Linley E. Pearson, Atty. Gen. of Indiana, Indianapolis, for defendants. Childs v. Duckworth, 509 F. Supp. 1254, 1256 (N.D. Ind. 1981) aff'd, 705 F.2d 915 (7th Cir. 1983)

  4. "Meanwhile small- and mid-size firms are getting squeezed and likely will not survive unless they become a boutique firm." I've been a business attorney in small, and now mid-size firm for over 30 years, and for over 30 years legal consultants have been preaching this exact same mantra of impending doom for small and mid-sized firms -- verbatim. This claim apparently helps them gin up merger opportunities from smaller firms who become convinced that they need to become larger overnight. The claim that large corporations are interested in cost-saving and efficiency has likewise been preached for decades, and is likewise bunk. If large corporations had any real interest in saving money they wouldn't use large law firms whose rates are substantially higher than those of high-quality mid-sized firms.

  5. The family is the foundation of all human government. That is the Grand Design. Modern governments throw off this Design and make bureaucratic war against the family, as does Hollywood and cultural elitists such as third wave feminists. Since WWII we have been on a ship of fools that way, with both the elite and government and their social engineering hacks relentlessly attacking the very foundation of social order. And their success? See it in the streets of Fergusson, on the food stamp doles (mostly broken families)and in the above article. Reject the Grand Design for true social function, enter the Glorious State to manage social dysfunction. Our Brave New World will be a prison camp, and we will welcome it as the only way to manage given the anarchy without it.

ADVERTISEMENT