ILNews

Lake County lawyers hold memorial service

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint
Bar Crawl

Bar Crawl is Indiana Lawyer’s section highlighting bar association news around the state. We try to include bar association news and trends in our regular stories, but we want to include more news from specialty and county bars. If you’d like to submit an update about your bar association or a photo from an event your bar association has hosted to Indiana Lawyer, or if you have questions about having your bar association news included in the newspaper, please send it to Rebecca Berfanger, rberfanger@ibj.com, along with contact information for any follow-up questions at least two weeks in advance of the issue date.

The Lake County Bar Association recognized and remembered 19 attorneys who died in 2010 at its annual memorial service Jan. 4 at the Lake Circuit Court in Crown Point.

Lake Circuit Judge George C. Paras called the program to order as his first official order of business for 2011, and Lake County Bar Association President Julie R. Glade welcomed all in attendance and introduced Valparaiso attorney and former LCBA president Daniel Gioia to begin the program.

Executive director of the Lake County Bar Association Debra White said the courtroom was filled with friends, families, attorneys, and judges in the Lake County legal community who knew those who were remembered.

“As a first time attendee of the memorial service, I was extremely impressed with the entire program. I thought the service was conducted in a classy and respectful format – one which allowed family and friends to come sit in the actual courtroom where many of their loved ones spent so much time,” White said via e-mail.

The attorneys remembered were Michael S. Vass of Highland, Luci Horton of Gary, LeRoy Dakich of Crown Point, Herbert S. Lasser of Chesterton, G. Edward McHie of Hammond and Denton, Md., Col. Lowell E. Enslen of Hammond, Thomas Lee Smith of Highland, John C. Skinner of Crown Point, Patrick J. Dougherty of Valparaiso, Kenneth L. Kostbade of Hobart, Saul I. Ruman of Dyer, Edwin T. Brown Jr. of Merrillville, Frederick T. Work Sr. of Gary, James V. Tsoutsouris of Valparaiso, Marvin E. Silverman of Whiting, Nick J. Thiros of Merrillville, Benedict R. Danko of Whiting, Gilbert F. Blackmun of Highland, and Edmund A Schroer of Hammond.

Among those in attendance was Highland attorney Debra Lynch Dubovich, who knew most of the 19 lawyers being remembered and gave the eulogy for Vass, who died Jan. 24, 2010.

“Every year, it is sobering to remember our fallen friends and colleagues, the attorneys we have lost during the previous year. It seems appropriate to begin the year embracing those memories, laughing about the good times and shedding a tear or two over the loss to our profession and in our personal lives. The memorial service sponsored by our bar association gives us that opportunity,” Dubovich said via e-mail.

The county-wide tradition of having a memorial service in the Lake Circuit Court dates back to 1989, Gioia said, but before the Lake County Bar Association existed as a unified bar association for the county, the Hammond Bar Association held a similar memorial event that would take place on the first day of court business for every new year in Lake Superior Court in Hammond. That tradition started in the 1970s.

The LCBA has an Honors and Necrology Committee, whose chair and assistant committee members collect obituaries of attorneys from the local newspapers. Each fall, they contact family members, partners, associates, and close friends to decide who could deliver a short eulogy to honor each deceased lawyer.

Since 1989, Enslen, who died May 15, 2010, and Gioia, served as committee chairs, and Arnold Krevitz acts as co-chair. The LCBA president also serves as an ex-officio member of the committee, pursuant to the LCBA bylaws.

The LCBA videotapes the presentations for family members and others who cannot attend. The only year since 1989 without a ceremony was 2007, when only one attorney from Lake County died.

Gioia thanked court secretary Nikki Angel for being helpful, cooperative, and instrumental in confirming the arrangements for this annual event.

Gioia said that after each memorial service, as the chair of the Honors and Necrology Committee, he presents a formal motion for the court to keep a record of the proceedings to be “preserved forever in the court archives, for the future and for all posterity.”


ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in Indiana Lawyer editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Indiana State Bar Association

Indianapolis Bar Association

Evansville Bar Association

Allen County Bar Association

Indiana Lawyer on Facebook

facebook
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. G. Michael Witte letter states he's suspended for three years. The case that got him suspended is identical to my estate case, including havin the Late Judge Deiter recuse himself because Newman had a conflict of interest with the judge. His Modus Operandi is nearly identical.

  2. SIGNED BY G. MICHAEL WITTE EXECUTIVE SECRETARY INDIANA SUPREME COURT DISCIPLINARY COMMISSION DATED MAY 17, 2012.

    Your 6th complaint against Lawrence T. Newman filed on 4/12/2012. On 1/31/12, the Indiana Supreme Court entered an order suspending Lawrence T. Newman’s law license for a period of three years. More important, even after three years, Lawrence Todd Newman will not get his license back unless and until he goes through a separate proceeding to prove that he is fit to practice law. This is not an easy process, and the burden is upon Lawrence T. Newman to prove by clear and convincing evidence that he is fit to return to practice.
    Because of the length of Lawrence T. Newman’s license suspension and the fact he may never succeed in getting his law license reinstated, we are not opening an investigation file at this time.
    Should Lawrence T. Newman seek reinstatement in the future, we will open your file and ask Lawrence T. Newman to address your grievance as part of his burden of proving fitness. We have attempted to notify Lawrence T. Newman that this will be required of him.
    It may disappoint you to hear that we will be doing nothing on your grievance at this time. However, the most our office can ever accomplish is to take away a lawyer’s license to practice law. We have already done that, albeit as a result of misconduct in cases other than your own. It makes better sense for our office to focus its limited resources on cases where the lawyers are still actively practicing law.

  3. Is there any justice in the Marion County Superior Court Civil Division? I am the unfortunate victim of a retaliatory lawsuit brought by Lawrence Todd Newman, the attorney from an estate case on which I worked as a unsupervised personal representative in 2006. The contract agreement for that case stated that the estate would be responsible for all attorney fees, but Newman refused to close the nearly insolvent estate when my duties were complete and his fees were paid. Instead, he tried to extort additional attorney fees from me by keeping the case open to address a wrongful death claim, despite the estate’s heir’s lack of interest in pursuing it and an expert doctor’s opinion that it would not be worth doing so. He also knowingly deceived me into believing that a “closing statement” was needed to close the estate, even though this requirement had actually been waived by the estate’s heir. The heir’s attorney filed a motion to have Newman removed from the case. After the court closed the probate case with prejudice (barred from further litigation) Newman illegally re-opened the case in another courtroom.
    As a result of complaints filed against him for these and similar actions, Newman has been suspended from practicing law for 18 months by the Indiana Disciplinary Commission. In retaliation, he has filed suit against me demanding additional attorney fees for the 2006 estate case, despite the fact that I made no agreement stating that I would pay any fees from my own assets on behalf of the estate. This lawsuit violates the rules of ethics, due process of law, and equal protection of law. Newman has been allowed to file ridiculous pleadings at an alarming rate and has been supported by a biased court system. Judge Carroll refuses to recuse himself from the case despite the fact that, by his own admission, he intends to grant Newman sanctions regardless of the evidence. When my former counsel discovered that the previous judge on the case, Judge Sosin, was a long-time close friend of Newman’s family, Judge Carroll commented for the record during a hearing that Judge Sosin in so many words “he finds the door “was weak for recusing himself from the case as a result of this obvious conflict of interest.
    This case is a public policy issue. Statutes put in place to protect unsupervised personal representatives in probate matters are being ignored. This case will affect thousands of individuals involved in probating and the personal representation of estates. Justice cannot possibly be served as long as a biased judge is allowed to defend a “vexatious litigant,” as Newman has been described by Judge Logan in Bradenton, Florida court. If there is any justice in the Marion County Superior Court Civil Division, this case against me will be dismissed with prejudice.

  4. Every affront to decency and every style adopted by criminals is not per se a constituttional violation. Only fools believe or espouse that.

  5. This was an unnecessary change in law, a needless fiddling with a tax that impacted very very few hoosiers, but one that erodes a tax base benefitting very many hoosiers. Just because some people wanted to chalk up a "tax cut" on their legislative brag-list, and didnt give a fig about replacing the revenue any other way. Really stupid. I am a republican my whole life and this just shames me like hell. I have to use a fake name over this because I know my fellow republicans are all brain washed over tax cutting too.

ADVERTISEMENT