ILNews

Lake County lawyers hold memorial service

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
Bar Crawl

Bar Crawl is Indiana Lawyer’s section highlighting bar association news around the state. We try to include bar association news and trends in our regular stories, but we want to include more news from specialty and county bars. If you’d like to submit an update about your bar association or a photo from an event your bar association has hosted to Indiana Lawyer, or if you have questions about having your bar association news included in the newspaper, please send it to Rebecca Berfanger, rberfanger@ibj.com, along with contact information for any follow-up questions at least two weeks in advance of the issue date.

The Lake County Bar Association recognized and remembered 19 attorneys who died in 2010 at its annual memorial service Jan. 4 at the Lake Circuit Court in Crown Point.

Lake Circuit Judge George C. Paras called the program to order as his first official order of business for 2011, and Lake County Bar Association President Julie R. Glade welcomed all in attendance and introduced Valparaiso attorney and former LCBA president Daniel Gioia to begin the program.

Executive director of the Lake County Bar Association Debra White said the courtroom was filled with friends, families, attorneys, and judges in the Lake County legal community who knew those who were remembered.

“As a first time attendee of the memorial service, I was extremely impressed with the entire program. I thought the service was conducted in a classy and respectful format – one which allowed family and friends to come sit in the actual courtroom where many of their loved ones spent so much time,” White said via e-mail.

The attorneys remembered were Michael S. Vass of Highland, Luci Horton of Gary, LeRoy Dakich of Crown Point, Herbert S. Lasser of Chesterton, G. Edward McHie of Hammond and Denton, Md., Col. Lowell E. Enslen of Hammond, Thomas Lee Smith of Highland, John C. Skinner of Crown Point, Patrick J. Dougherty of Valparaiso, Kenneth L. Kostbade of Hobart, Saul I. Ruman of Dyer, Edwin T. Brown Jr. of Merrillville, Frederick T. Work Sr. of Gary, James V. Tsoutsouris of Valparaiso, Marvin E. Silverman of Whiting, Nick J. Thiros of Merrillville, Benedict R. Danko of Whiting, Gilbert F. Blackmun of Highland, and Edmund A Schroer of Hammond.

Among those in attendance was Highland attorney Debra Lynch Dubovich, who knew most of the 19 lawyers being remembered and gave the eulogy for Vass, who died Jan. 24, 2010.

“Every year, it is sobering to remember our fallen friends and colleagues, the attorneys we have lost during the previous year. It seems appropriate to begin the year embracing those memories, laughing about the good times and shedding a tear or two over the loss to our profession and in our personal lives. The memorial service sponsored by our bar association gives us that opportunity,” Dubovich said via e-mail.

The county-wide tradition of having a memorial service in the Lake Circuit Court dates back to 1989, Gioia said, but before the Lake County Bar Association existed as a unified bar association for the county, the Hammond Bar Association held a similar memorial event that would take place on the first day of court business for every new year in Lake Superior Court in Hammond. That tradition started in the 1970s.

The LCBA has an Honors and Necrology Committee, whose chair and assistant committee members collect obituaries of attorneys from the local newspapers. Each fall, they contact family members, partners, associates, and close friends to decide who could deliver a short eulogy to honor each deceased lawyer.

Since 1989, Enslen, who died May 15, 2010, and Gioia, served as committee chairs, and Arnold Krevitz acts as co-chair. The LCBA president also serves as an ex-officio member of the committee, pursuant to the LCBA bylaws.

The LCBA videotapes the presentations for family members and others who cannot attend. The only year since 1989 without a ceremony was 2007, when only one attorney from Lake County died.

Gioia thanked court secretary Nikki Angel for being helpful, cooperative, and instrumental in confirming the arrangements for this annual event.

Gioia said that after each memorial service, as the chair of the Honors and Necrology Committee, he presents a formal motion for the court to keep a record of the proceedings to be “preserved forever in the court archives, for the future and for all posterity.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in Indiana Lawyer editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. Indiana's seatbelt law is not punishable as a crime. It is an infraction. Apparently some of our Circuit judges have deemed settled law inapplicable if it fails to fit their litmus test of political correctness. Extrapolating to redefine terms of behavior in a violation of immigration law to the entire body of criminal law leaves a smorgasbord of opportunity for judicial mischief.

  2. I wonder if $10 diversions for failure to wear seat belts are considered moral turpitude in federal immigration law like they are under Indiana law? Anyone know?

  3. What a fine article, thank you! I can testify firsthand and by detailed legal reports (at end of this note) as to the dire consequences of rejecting this truth from the fine article above: "The inclusion and expansion of this right [to jury] in Indiana’s Constitution is a clear reflection of our state’s intention to emphasize the importance of every Hoosier’s right to make their case in front of a jury of their peers." Over $20? Every Hoosier? Well then how about when your very vocation is on the line? How about instead of a jury of peers, one faces a bevy of political appointees, mini-czars, who care less about due process of the law than the real czars did? Instead of trial by jury, trial by ideological ordeal run by Orwellian agents? Well that is built into more than a few administrative law committees of the Ind S.Ct., and it is now being weaponized, as is revealed in articles posted at this ezine, to root out post moderns heresies like refusal to stand and pledge allegiance to all things politically correct. My career was burned at the stake for not so saluting, but I think I was just one of the early logs. Due, at least in part, to the removal of the jury from bar admission and bar discipline cases, many more fires will soon be lit. Perhaps one awaits you, dear heretic? Oh, at that Ind. article 12 plank about a remedy at law for every damage done ... ah, well, the founders evidently meant only for those damages done not by the government itself, rabid statists that they were. (Yes, that was sarcasm.) My written reports available here: Denied petition for cert (this time around): http://tinyurl.com/zdmawmw Denied petition for cert (from the 2009 denial and five year banishment): http://tinyurl.com/zcypybh Related, not written by me: Amicus brief: http://tinyurl.com/hvh7qgp

  4. Justice has finally been served. So glad that Dr. Ley can finally sleep peacefully at night knowing the truth has finally come to the surface.

  5. While this right is guaranteed by our Constitution, it has in recent years been hampered by insurance companies, i.e.; the practice of the plaintiff's own insurance company intervening in an action and filing a lien against any proceeds paid to their insured. In essence, causing an additional financial hurdle for a plaintiff to overcome at trial in terms of overall award. In a very real sense an injured party in exercise of their right to trial by jury may be the only party in a cause that would end up with zero compensation.

ADVERTISEMENT