ILNews

Law firms pursue BP bad-gas class action

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Editor's note: This story has been updated.

One Indiana firm has filed a class-action lawsuit against BP in the wake of the company's gasoline recall in northwest Indiana. Two other law firms are pursuing a possible class-action suit.

Indianapolis firm Price Waicukauski and Riley LLC announced Friday afternoon it filed a proposed class action in the Hammond Division in the Northern District of Indiana. The suit seeks to represent all Indiana residents who purchaed the defective fuel. The plaintiff purchased defective BP gas Aug. 19. The following day, the plaintiff's car would not start, and a mechanic discovered the defecutive fuel had "significantly damaged the engine," according to a release from the firm.

Cohen & Malad LLP in Indianapolis and Theodoros & Rooth P.C. in Merrillville jointly have begun investigating the potential size and claims of a lawsuit after BP recalled gasoline blended at its facilities in Whiting.

The bad gas was sold at BP locations and other stations including Luke Oil and Thornton’s. It also was sold in locations from Milwaukee, Wis., to southwest Michigan, according to news reports.

BP said 2.1 million gallons of fuel blended between Aug. 13 and 17 contained a “higher than normal level of polymeric residue,” according to a statement from Indiana Attorney General Greg Zoeller, whose office has started an investigation. In a statement Thursday, BP blamed the problem on an alkylation unit at the Whiting refinery and said it had been corrected.

 “We have been told that as many as 100,000 people may have purchased the gasoline,” Cohen & Malad managing partner Irwin Levin said Friday. “We know that already at least 10,000 people complained to BP, so the numbers of the class are certainly going to be in the five figures.”

“People deserve justice and assurance that a company like BP will be held accountable for its actions,” Barry Rooth of Theodoros & Rooth said in a statement. “Thousands of people were impacted by this contaminated gas and have spent hundreds of dollars in car repairs. We are seeking full compensation for their damages.”

BP acted after hundreds of motorists complained about hard starting and unusual engine noise and shaking. Levin said the firm has consulted with experts about possible resulting engine damage.

BP has asked customers who think they might have purchased tainted gas to call its hotline, 800-333-3991, or email bpconsum@bp.com. Zoeller said consumers may file a complaint with the attorney general’s office online at www.indianaconsumer.com or by calling 800-382-5516.

For more information about PWR's suit, contact the firm at 317-633-8787. Those interested in learning more about the planned class action should call Cohen & Malad at 317-636-6481 or Theodoros & Rooth at 219-769-6393.


 

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in Indiana Lawyer editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Indiana State Bar Association

Indianapolis Bar Association

Evansville Bar Association

Allen County Bar Association

Indiana Lawyer on Facebook

facebook
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. It appears the police and prosecutors are allowed to change the rules halfway through the game to suit themselves. I am surprised that the congress has not yet eliminated the right to a trial in cases involving any type of forensic evidence. That would suit their foolish law and order police state views. I say we eliminate the statute of limitations for crimes committed by members of congress and other government employees. Of course they would never do that. They are all corrupt cowards!!!

  2. Poor Judge Brown probably thought that by slavishly serving the godz of the age her violations of 18th century concepts like due process and the rule of law would be overlooked. Mayhaps she was merely a Judge ahead of her time?

  3. in a lawyer discipline case Judge Brown, now removed, was presiding over a hearing about a lawyer accused of the supposedly heinous ethical violation of saying the words "Illegal immigrant." (IN re Barker) http://www.in.gov/judiciary/files/order-discipline-2013-55S00-1008-DI-429.pdf .... I wonder if when we compare the egregious violations of due process by Judge Brown, to her chiding of another lawyer for politically incorrectness, if there are any conclusions to be drawn about what kind of person, what kind of judge, what kind of apparatchik, is busy implementing the agenda of political correctness and making off-limits legit advocacy about an adverse party in a suit whose illegal alien status is relevant? I am just asking the question, the reader can make own conclsuion. Oh wait-- did I use the wrong adjective-- let me rephrase that, um undocumented alien?

  4. of course the bigger questions of whether or not the people want to pay for ANY bussing is off limits, due to the Supreme Court protecting the people from DEMOCRACY. Several decades hence from desegregation and bussing plans and we STILL need to be taking all this taxpayer money to combat mostly-imagined "discrimination" in the most obviously failed social program of the postwar period.

  5. You can put your photos anywhere you like... When someone steals it they know it doesn't belong to them. And, a man getting a divorce is automatically not a nice guy...? That's ridiculous. Since when is need of money a conflict of interest? That would mean that no one should have a job unless they are already financially solvent without a job... A photographer is also under no obligation to use a watermark (again, people know when a photo doesn't belong to them) or provide contact information. Hey, he didn't make it easy for me to pay him so I'll just take it! Well heck, might as well walk out of the grocery store with a cart full of food because the lines are too long and you don't find that convenient. "Only in Indiana." Oh, now you're passing judgement on an entire state... What state do you live in? I need to characterize everyone in your state as ignorant and opinionated. And the final bit of ignorance; assuming a photo anyone would want is lucky and then how much does your camera have to cost to make it a good photo, in your obviously relevant opinion?

ADVERTISEMENT