ILNews

Law School Briefs - 9/28/11

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
Law School Briefs

Law School Briefs is Indiana Lawyer’s section highlighting news from law schools in Indiana. While IL has always covered law school news and continues to keep up with law school websites and press releases for updates, we gladly accept submissions for this section from law students, professors, alumni, and others who want to share law school-related news. If you’d like to submit news or a photo from an event, please send it to Jenny Montgomery at jmontgomery@ibj.com, along with contact information for any follow-up questions at least two weeks in advance of the issue date.

IP lunch speaker

The Center for Intellectual Property Law and Innovation at Indiana University School of Law – Indianapolis will host attorney Cedric D’Hue for a lunchtime talk about “Financial Considerations with Starting Your Own Law Firm.” The event is from 12:45 p.m. to 1:30 p.m. at the IP Center on the Canal, 350 Canal Walk, Suite B.

D’Hue, a 2005 graduate of the law school, started his own IP law firm in 2009. He worked as an analytical chemist at Copley Pharmaceutical and TEVA USA Inc. in Canton, Mass. While receiving his master’s degree in analytical chemistry, he participated in the Industrial Co-op Program at Heritage Environmental Services. As a graduate and undergraduate teaching assistant, he instructed laboratory classes on numerous chromatography and spectroscopy techniques. His graduate thesis is on computer simulations of a Diels-Alder cycloaddition using stereospecific catalysts. At the law school, D’Hue was named to the Order of the Barristers, worked on the Indiana Health Law Review, and represented IU School of Law – Indianapolis at the Saul Lefkowitz Moot Court Competition as well as the National Health Law Moot Court Competition. 

The free event is open to alumni and students. Additional information is available through Kyle Galster, IP center coordinator, at kgalster@iupui.edu or 317-274-1916.

Health law CLE

Indiana University School of Law – Indianapolis will hold a continuing legal education seminar on health law developments and trends from 8:45 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. Oct. 11 at Inlow Hall’s Wynne Courtroom and Conour Atrium, 530 W. New York St.

Topics include the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, electronic medical records, Indiana lawyer discipline cases, AIDS, and federal preemption of state law.

Presenters include Tim Pratt, executive vice president, chief administrative officer, general counsel and secretary for Boston Scientific; Ralph Hall, distinguished professor & practitioner, University of Minnesota School of Law; Nicolas P. Terry, Chester A. Myers professor of law, St. Louis University School of Law; G. Michael Witte, executive secretary, Indiana Disciplinary Commission; Mary Davis, Stites and Harbison professor of law, University of Kentucky College of Law; John McGoldrick, chairman, Zimmer Holdings, and special adviser, International AIDS Vaccine Initiative. The moderator is IU School of Law – Indianapolis Professor Andrew Klein.

The registration fee of $250 includes materials, refreshments, parking, and lunch. The program carries six hours of CLE, including one hour of ethics credit. Additional information is available online at http://indylaw.indiana.edu/news/events.cfm?eid=460, or by calling Shaun Dankoski at 317-278-4789.•

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in Indiana Lawyer editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. Major social engineering imposed by judicial order well in advance of democratic change, has been the story of the whole post ww2 period. Contraception, desegregation, abortion, gay marriage: all rammed down the throats of Americans who didn't vote to change existing laws on any such thing, by the unelected lifetime tenure Supreme court heirarchs. Maybe people came to accept those things once imposed upon them, but, that's accommodation not acceptance; and surely not democracy. So let's quit lying to the kids telling them this is a democracy. Some sort of oligarchy, but no democracy that's for sure, and it never was. A bourgeois republic from day one.

  2. JD Massur, yes, brings to mind a similar stand at a Texas Mission in 1836. Or Vladivostok in 1918. As you seemingly gloat, to the victors go the spoils ... let the looting begin, right?

  3. I always wondered why high fence deer hunting was frowned upon? I guess you need to keep the population steady. If you don't, no one can enjoy hunting! Thanks for the post! Fence

  4. Whether you support "gay marriage" or not is not the issue. The issue is whether the SCOTUS can extract from an unmentionable somewhere the notion that the Constitution forbids government "interference" in the "right" to marry. Just imagine time-traveling to Philadelphia in 1787. Ask James Madison if the document he and his fellows just wrote allowed him- or forbade government to "interfere" with- his "right" to marry George Washington? He would have immediately- and justly- summoned the Sergeant-at-Arms to throw your sorry self out into the street. Far from being a day of liberation, this is a day of capitulation by the Rule of Law to the Rule of What's Happening Now.

  5. With today's ruling, AG Zoeller's arguments in the cases of Obamacare and Same-sex Marriage can be relegated to the ash heap of history. 0-fer

ADVERTISEMENT