Lawsuits say Munster cardiologist inserted unneeded defibrillators

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

A Lake County cardiologist sued for performing surgeries to insert heart defibrillators that two patients say they didn’t need may have performed other such unnecessary procedures, attorneys say.

A consortium of law firms Wednesday announced action against Dr. Arvind Gandhi and Munster Community Hospital. Two former patients, Gloria Sargent and Raymond Kammer, claim Gandhi operated on them and inserted defibrillators that weren’t needed.

Kammer was 25 at the time Gandhi implanted the device. Ghandi recommended implanting the device before first attempting more conservative treatment.

 Sargent had received a defibrillator nine months earlier that Gandhi recommended be upgraded, and she later required a heart transplant, according to information contained in their civil lawsuits.

Medical Review Panels found Gandhi did not meet an appropriate standard of care in either case and that the procedures were unnecessary. The panels found evidence did not support such determinations regarding the hospitals, and that Gandhi’s medical license should not be reviewed for fitness to practice.

Last month, Kammer and Sargent each filed suits in Lake Circuit Court naming as defendants Gandhi; his practice, Cardiology Associates of Northwest Indiana, P.C.; and Munster Community Hospital. The suits allege medical negligence, assert Gandhi wasn’t properly credentialed, and state claims for breach of contract.

 “It is unknown at this time just how many other patients have had unnecessary surgeries at the hands of Dr. Gandhi,” Lowell attorney Paul Rossi, who filed the suits, said in a statement. “My prior investigation and discoveries into Dr. Gandhi and Munster Community Hospital as it relates to Mr. Kammer and Ms. Sargent lead me to be very concerned for many others.”

Joining Rossi in seeking other potential claimants are the law firms Theodoros & Rooth P.C. of Merrillville and Cohen & Malad LLP of Indianapolis.

Attorneys noted that Gandhi ranked 19th out of 22,241 cardiologists nationwide in Medicare billings for 2012. He was reimbursed almost $2.18 million, more than any cardiologist in Indiana.

An official at Munster Community Hospital did not respond to a message seeking comment. In a statement to media on Wednesday, the hospital said the claims previously had been rejected.

“There are no new allegations against Dr. Gandhi or Community Hospital,” the hospital said in a statement. “Community has filed a motion to dismiss the malpractice cases against it because the medical review panel found in favor of the hospital.”


  • Lawsuits say Munster cardiologist
    Dr wail asfour lives 3 hours from the hospital,where if he gets an emergency at least he needs three hours,while even if he is on call he should be in a location where it gives him max 10 minutes to be beside the patient,they get paid double on their on call days ,where look how they handle it,so if the death of the patient occurs on weekend and these doctors still repeat same pattern such issue should be raised,they should be closer to the patient.on other hand if all the death occured on the absence of the Dr and the nurses handle it,the nurses should get trained how to function appearntly they not that good,if the Dr lives 3 hours far from the hospital on his call days he should sleep in the hospital

Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in Indiana Lawyer editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. I think the cops are doing a great job locking up criminals. The Murder rates in the inner cities are skyrocketing and you think that too any people are being incarcerated. Maybe we need to lock up more of them. We have the ACLU, BLM, NAACP, Civil right Division of the DOJ, the innocent Project etc. We have court system with an appeal process that can go on for years, with attorneys supplied by the government. I'm confused as to how that translates into the idea that the defendants are not being represented properly. Maybe the attorneys need to do more Pro-Bono work

  2. We do not have 10% of our population (which would mean about 32 million) incarcerated. It's closer to 2%.

  3. If a class action suit or other manner of retribution is possible, count me in. I have email and voicemail from the man. He colluded with opposing counsel, I am certain. My case was damaged so severely it nearly lost me everything and I am still paying dearly.

  4. There's probably a lot of blame that can be cast around for Indiana Tech's abysmal bar passage rate this last February. The folks who decided that Indiana, a state with roughly 16,000 to 18,000 attorneys, needs a fifth law school need to question the motives that drove their support of this project. Others, who have been "strong supporters" of the law school, should likewise ask themselves why they believe this institution should be supported. Is it because it fills some real need in the state? Or is it, instead, nothing more than a resume builder for those who teach there part-time? And others who make excuses for the students' poor performance, especially those who offer nothing more than conspiracy theories to back up their claims--who are they helping? What evidence do they have to support their posturing? Ultimately, though, like most everything in life, whether one succeeds or fails is entirely within one's own hands. At least one student from Indiana Tech proved this when he/she took and passed the February bar. A second Indiana Tech student proved this when they took the bar in another state and passed. As for the remaining 9 who took the bar and didn't pass (apparently, one of the students successfully appealed his/her original score), it's now up to them (and nobody else) to ensure that they pass on their second attempt. These folks should feel no shame; many currently successful practicing attorneys failed the bar exam on their first try. These same attorneys picked themselves up, dusted themselves off, and got back to the rigorous study needed to ensure they would pass on their second go 'round. This is what the Indiana Tech students who didn't pass the first time need to do. Of course, none of this answers such questions as whether Indiana Tech should be accredited by the ABA, whether the school should keep its doors open, or, most importantly, whether it should have even opened its doors in the first place. Those who promoted the idea of a fifth law school in Indiana need to do a lot of soul-searching regarding their decisions. These same people should never be allowed, again, to have a say about the future of legal education in this state or anywhere else. Indiana already has four law schools. That's probably one more than it really needs. But it's more than enough.

  5. This man Steve Hubbard goes on any online post or forum he can find and tries to push his company. He said court reporters would be obsolete a few years ago, yet here we are. How does he have time to search out every single post about court reporters and even spy in private court reporting forums if his company is so successful???? Dude, get a life. And back to what this post was about, I agree that some national firms cause a huge problem.